Comments

  1. Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui says

    Same-sex marriage is an injustice, a tyrannical ploy being perpetrated upon our society, the pernicious consequences of which are simply mocked and laughed at by its supporters. Ignorance and prejudice have taken the place of knowledge and reason. Caprice and passion substituted for prudence and virtue. The happiness of society, the good of all families, and the welfare of mankind fall victim to the injustice of selfish love, which calculates every thing for itself while taking no notice of a child’s best interest or the public advantage of the government promoting ONLY the traditional family.

    In the eyes of a child, same-sex marriage appears adulterous by nature. Someone is not present in his/her home who is his/her true mother or father. No good can come from adultery, only broken homes and broken hearts. At best, an adoptive virtuous heterosexual man and woman can soften the evil sustained by children of adultery, but same-sex proponents want their adulterous families to be considered normal and “equal” to a monogamous heterosexual marriage — which study after study has proven to be the best environment for child-rearing. There is simply no virtue in ignorance, or in denying truth.

    Here are two truths regarding marriage: (1) A man creating a family with another man is not equal to creating a family with a woman, and (2) denying children parents of both genders at home is an objective evil. Kids need and yearn for both.

    Same-sex marriage in unconformable to the state of a rational social being, it is defective in principle, and has ONLY a deceitful appearance to young and old because it denies Natural Law. All babies grow up to eventually figure out that it takes a man and a woman to bring a new life into the world.

    At school, those kids who have two mothers or two fathers will be different, and the other children will notice that the child of a same-sex couple is different in many ways. Besides the obvious exclusion of either a mother or a father at home, a same-sex-marriage child is deprived of one necessary gender role model at home, and will undoubtedly interact differently than other children of his/her gender, and especially with regards to interacting with the opposite sex of his/her same-sex parents. It is without a doubt that these children will be recognized to be different by the children who have a mother and a father at home, and especially when they have both of their biological parents at home.

    In order to protect the child of a same-sex marriage from any perceived harassment, that child will become a special protected class in the eyes of the government. School officials will have to punish and “re-educate” any child who “offends” the protected-class child by simply expressing that it is strange that the child of the same-sex marriage is missing a mother or a father, or that the child acts in a manner unusual to his gender contemporaries.

    This unjust punishment to subvert the natural understanding of children is evidence enough that same-sex families do not follow core principles of Natural Law, and because same-sex marriage defies Natural Law, pernicious consequences will inevitably happen. To punish a child for saying what he knows is true (all children have a mother and a father) is nothing less than a tyrannical oppression to children who instinctively rely upon Nature’s Laws to help them understand life and natural consequences. Children will be coerced to accept as “natural” what are unnatural behaviors, and this challenge to their instinctual knowledge of right and wrong will result in confusion. A morally-confused child is more susceptible to evil and perversion than one who is confident in his knowledge of right and wrong. Evil-doers know this, and will thrive in a society that indoctrinates its children to see no inherent evil in disregarding Natural Law. Alas, those who support same-sex marriage have apparently fallen too far into the depravity of tolerating licentiousness themselves to realize or acknowledge the harm and injustice same-sex marriage imposes upon our children and thus our society. Society institutionalizes marriage to enforce the natural rights and responsibilities of the organic family unit.

    Marriage was instituted to protect the Natural Rights of children. Same-sex marriage ignores nature and tramples those rights in the name of “equality”.

  2. Douglas says

    They look perfect together.

    P.S. to Jean-Jacques: Thanks for taking the time to copy and paste all that BS. Now go fvck yourself–in a same-sex kinda way.

  3. Joseph says

    Jean-Jacques Burlamaqui comes back from the dead and posts on Towelroad, interesting. Of course he is perplexed by same-sex marriage, he must also be perplexed that a group of British sailed over to the Americas and started their own country and that slavery is outlawed most places in the world and that women are treated as equals in own quaint country of Switzerland. Yeah the world has changed a bit since you died in 1748, I can understand your confusion. Perhaps you should just go back into your grave where you belong.

  4. ble.d_out.colo.r says

    So am I the only one who misread Sithole? That has to be the most unfortunate last name in the history of ever. That aside congrats to the happy couple and I hope in this case Mr. Sithole decides to take his husbands last name lol. Good on you for being vanguards in the African culture and leaders of change for the better. Now I just wish America would follow suit and catch up.

  5. ble.d_out.colo.r says

    So am I the only one who misread Sithole? That has to be the most unfortunate last name in the history of ever. That aside congrats to the happy couple and I hope in this case Mr. Sithole decides to take his husbands last name lol. Good on you for being vanguards in the African culture and leaders of change for the better. Now I just wish America would follow suit and catch up.

  6. Rick says

    “So am I the only one who misread Sithole? That has to be the most unfortunate last name in the history of ever”

    In the native language, it would be pronounced SEE-TOE-LAY. I know you were probaby just trying to be funny, but…..

    Great that both men wore traditional MALE attire, appropriate for warriors or royalty, emphasizing that a bond between two men is (should always be) a uniquely masculine experience.

  7. UFFDA says

    Rick was over at my place last night. We braided each other’s hair, drank apple-tinis and then posted things on Towleroad about how awesome traditional masculinity is and how femmes are ruining everything.

  8. Rick says

    Hey Gurl, HEY! I had so much fun with you! I have to ask, though, what do you use to keep your family preserved upstairs? Mother is starting to rot. Oh, how she HATES to rot! You know us gurls, always wanting to keep fresh.
    Wanna paint each other’s toe-nails next time? It can be a really masculine color, don’t worry. Like puce.

  9. Malinga says

    This is what I have been waiting for, nw people can see that we have relationships nd serious once, I say this because I am happy married gay guy nd I love my husband, U guys u look good together don’t let anything or anyone came between u guys. What a beautiful traditional wedding I loved it.

  10. Bill says

    @misha: whether or not the guy in question was actually dead for 200 years, it is certainly possible to get messages from the dead over the Internet – I once received an email that was delivered a year after it was sent! And that email was being sent at work from one employee to another.
    And that was with all of us, and the mail server, being in the same building.

  11. jamal49 says

    JJB um, yeah. Right. Gee, uh, thanks so much for the, well, interesting remarks. You’re not serious, right? About all that stuff you wrote, right? Oh? You ARE serious?

    Well, then, please sit down and shut up. Then, go back to your crypt.

    As for the newly-wedded couple, may their lives be lived in love for 1,000 X 1,000 years.

  12. andrew says

    @Jean-Jacques VERBIGE: Cut the sh!t, nobody reads all that crap you are posting. After the first two sentences all realize that you are a jacka$$.

  13. antb says

    Stan Tambo, maybe one day you will gain use of 100% of your brain and repent your bigoted behavior toward other people. I doubt it, because you sure come off like a hater-loser-closet case, but maybe.

  14. DW says

    Note that “Jean-Jacques” states “A man creating a family with another man is not equal to creating a family with a woman,” but makes no mention of female couples. Because, in the end, this isn’t about natural law or the morals of children, it’s about the demons in his own head.

  15. DW says

    Note that “Jean-Jacques” states “A man creating a family with another man is not equal to creating a family with a woman,” but makes no mention of female couples. Because, in the end, this isn’t about natural law or the morals of children, it’s about the demons in his own head.

  16. DW says

    Note that “Jean-Jacques” states “A man creating a family with another man is not equal to creating a family with a woman,” but makes no mention of female couples. Because, in the end, this isn’t about natural law or the morals of children, it’s about the demons in his own head.

  17. DW says

    Not surprisingly, “Jean-Jacques” only references “a man creating a family with another man” but makes no mention of female couples. Because, in the end, this isn’t about natural law or the raising of children, it’s about the oh-so-enticing demons in his own head.

  18. DW says

    Not surprisingly, “Jean-Jacques” only references “a man creating a family with another man” but makes no mention of female couples. Because, in the end, this isn’t about natural law or the raising of children, it’s about the oh-so-enticing demons in his own head.

  19. ThisIsAbomination says

    What an abomination and soiling of the earth. Thank God I am not from this country and I pray the Almighty God that this evil never come to my land, my country, or my people to contaminate my culture. May the Lord God forbid it. This generation is wacky, filled with lust, disgust and messengers from the depths of hell. What future do we leave for the generations to come? what footprints do we leave, I bet your ancestors will turn in their graves. Abomination! I say. Doom!

  20. Jekky says

    THESE ARE UNDER 15 AGED BOYS ACTING A PLAY. IT IS DEFINITELY NOT TRADITIONAL MARRIAGE, AS NO MARRIAGE IS POSSIBLE IN AFRICA WITHOUT EXTENDED FAMILY MEMBERS. YES, MARRIAGE IS A COVENANT BETWEEN FAMILIES, WELL BEYOND JUST TWO PERSONS. THESE ACTORS WILL GROW UP, AFTER TAKING THE MONEY FROM THE PUBLISHERS OF THIS ROTTEN WEBPAGE, TO GO AND CHOOSE BEAUTIFUL BABES FOR REAL FRUITFUL (WITH CHILDREN) MARRIAGE. LONG LIVE AFRICA! LONG LIVE OUR HONOURABLE TRADITIONS.

Leave A Reply