Towleroad Guide to the Tube #1401

DON'T TRY THIS AT HOME: Recently unearthed footage of a man piercing his body with a sword (Warning: graphic).

HOVERCRAFT GOLF CART: The future is here.

MAPLE GROVE: Pro-gay Minnesota church vandalized again.

ROBERT GAGNON: Homosexuality is a declaration "that your maleness is only half-intact."

For recent Guides to the Tube, click HERE.


  1. says

    Gagnon blathers on with his Rumsfeldesque illogic.
    “Having sex with a person of the same sex implicitly makes the commentary that their own sex is only half intact.”

    Why should sex with my BF be “half intact” just because we don’t want sex with women ?
    Who is this plonker to tell us we are half intact ?
    Has he been reading the Catholic Catechism where we are called ” intrinsically disordered” ?
    These slow learners just come out with this dressed up garbage and try to sound intelligent…..what a stupid man.

  2. JONES says

    From Equality Matters:

    Robert Gagable

    At the end of July, the National Organization for Marriage’s (NOM) Ruth Institute will host its annual “It Takes A Family To Raise A Village” (ITAF) conference, which is geared towards introducing students to prominent anti-gay activists in order to prepare them to defend “natural marriage.” One of the speakers attending the event is Robert Gagnon, an Associate Professor of the New Testament with a history of linking homosexuality to pedophilia, promoting “ex-gay” therapy, and condemning homosexuality as unhealthy and dysfunctional.’

    NOM. Paid anti-gay activist. Need we say more.

  3. anon says

    Gagnon’s argument, aside from being ridiculous nonsense, is also invalid.

    If a male and female create a whole sexual being, then each is still only a half-sexual being, so they would each have to consider themselves a half-sexual being (whatever that is). So if two males make a whole sexual being, there really isn’t any difference. The problem is he lets slide the unexplained distinction between whole sexual being and whole male, and so we cannot or should not accept the language of “whole male” that he is implying.

    The nonsense is almost endless: people don’t have sex to make a “whole” anything; what is a whole sexual being?; what is a whole male? Why is it bad to be a half-male? and why would a half-male want to have sex with another man to become “whole”?

  4. odsbjorn says

    Well, he is a associate professor of New Testament(?) at Pittsburgh Theological Seminary, so logical thinking has probably never been a strength, much less mathematics.

  5. says

    So sex organs MUST go with the mutated versions of themselves that some other people have. SO even though you are pushing the same thing into the same thing, it is now considered whole?

    Men are just mutated women dude.

Leave A Reply