I'm Not Gay | Morrissey | News

Morrissey: I'm Not Gay, 'I am Humasexual'


In response to reports about excerpts of his Autobiography emerged last week in which he describes his first relationship with a man, Morrissey has released a statement on his fan site setting the record straight.

Says Morrissey:

"Unfortunately, I am not homosexual. In technical fact, I am humasexual. I am attracted to humans. But, of course ... not many".

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. So, you tool, you're bisexual? WTF is it with ppl avoiding calling themselves bisexual?

    Posted by: Mike | Oct 21, 2013 8:54:20 AM

  2. So he wants the fun without the stigma, and he would not be the first. Whatever Morrissey, we'll always love you, but it's not the 80's now.

    Posted by: sundayboy | Oct 21, 2013 9:05:01 AM

  3. Oh Prunella!

    Posted by: David Ehrenstein | Oct 21, 2013 9:08:06 AM

  4. The biphobia is strong in this one.

    Posted by: Gregory In Seattle | Oct 21, 2013 9:09:36 AM

  5. Yawn. Bored.

    Posted by: Mark In DC | Oct 21, 2013 9:09:50 AM

  6. Please please please let him get what he wants!

    Posted by: Jack M | Oct 21, 2013 9:23:51 AM

  7. Another drear who is against labels.

    People who say 'I don't like labels' are actually saying 'I don't like language'.

    Posted by: MaryM | Oct 21, 2013 9:28:14 AM

  8. You mean Morrissey wants to be HUMAN and not LGBTQIA (where poeple refer to him themselves as "genderqueer" and "pansexual")?

    By the way -- how did people QUESTIONING their sexuality hitch a ride on the political train? And intersexed people? Is intersex different from trans? Can hermaprodites get their own "H" letter on our train?

    Posted by: will | Oct 21, 2013 9:36:23 AM

  9. Word is that humanity isn't calling him back.

    Posted by: Frank | Oct 21, 2013 9:39:06 AM

  10. sorry, I think Mr. Morrissey's explanation is dumb..........why doesn't he just say he is bisexual???????????

    Posted by: Bernie | Oct 21, 2013 9:40:01 AM

  11. The new LGBTQIA stance: Anyone rejecting our labels must be ridiculed and squashed!

    Posted by: will | Oct 21, 2013 9:44:59 AM

  12. You're bisexual, get over it. Save that pretentious nonsense for the teen/twentysomethings that are still deluded that they are the first to experience something.

    Posted by: LiamB | Oct 21, 2013 9:59:34 AM

  13. If he is indeed attracted to humans, both male and female, then there is a perfectly good descriptive already: bisexual. No need to make up a new one.

    Posted by: Jeff | Oct 21, 2013 10:05:17 AM

  14. I think he's actually trying to liberate us all from labels. Not just himself. He is Morrissey, after all. Bow down bitches!

    Posted by: Kissyfur | Oct 21, 2013 10:13:09 AM

  15. Pray, then, what is "humasexual" if not a label? And a pretty lame one at that.

    Posted by: Jeff | Oct 21, 2013 10:16:28 AM

  16. Will,

    Intersex is the scientific (and less offensive) term for "hermaphrodite."

    Posted by: Acronym Jim | Oct 21, 2013 10:31:51 AM

  17. Kissyfur, "Humansexual" IS a label, and a vague, useless one at that. It's pure pretentiousness, nothing more.

    Posted by: LiamB | Oct 21, 2013 10:39:50 AM

  18. People who say 'I don't like labels' are actually saying "I wish I weren't gay."

    Posted by: David Ehrenstein | Oct 21, 2013 10:47:50 AM

  19. What David Ehrenstein said.

    Posted by: Reel Charlie | Oct 21, 2013 10:52:30 AM

  20. Yes, David is right. There's not a chance he's bi. I got tired of his game with "labels" around 1988. But it never ends.

    Posted by: Paul R | Oct 21, 2013 10:55:27 AM

  21. Dear Morrissey:

    Dry up and take your stupid closeted dumb-ass semantics with you.


    Posted by: jamal49 | Oct 21, 2013 11:19:57 AM

  22. You shut your mouth,

    How can you say,

    That Morrissey is only gay?

    He is humansexual

    And he needs to be loved

    Preferably by someone with a penis!

    Posted by: FuryOfFirestorm | Oct 21, 2013 12:01:20 PM

  23. Anything to avoid being labeled as gay...smh.

    On another note, a "humansexual" is probably alot closer to being pansexual or queer, than it is to being bisexual.

    I say this because pan's/queers are capable of being attracted to all sex's AND genders. Whereas Bi's are attracted to both sex's, but typically only those sexs that align to their respective genders.

    Posted by: anony6 | Oct 21, 2013 12:03:09 PM

  24. How dare Morrissey not align himself with the established terminology. He must be shunned for this.

    Posted by: bicuriousus | Oct 21, 2013 12:32:31 PM

  25. How dare he reject our threefold Victorian paradigm's inherent perfection?! There must be something wrong with him!

    Posted by: Shelly | Oct 21, 2013 1:06:54 PM

  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment


« «Retired Catholic Priest Marries First Gay Couples in Asbury Park, NJ: VIDEO« «