AIDS/HIV | Carl Sciortino | Massachusetts | News

Massachusetts Lawmaker Announces He is HIV-Positive, Resigns to Run AIDS Charity

Sciortino

Out gay Massachusetts State Representative Carl Sciortino (above, right), who made headlines last November in an ad in which he came out to his Tea Party father as a Massachusetts liberal one month after marrying his partner Pem Brown, announced he's resigning from his office in the state's 34th Middlesex District. 

Sciortino said he's HIV-positive, and plans to lead Massachusetts' AIDS Action Committee:

“As a gay man living with HIV, I am honored to lead one of the country’s oldest and most effective organizations in the battle against this disease which has raged on over 30 years,” said Sciortino. “My goal for AIDS Action in the years ahead is simple: continue the work that has resulted in lowering the rate of new HIV diagnoses in Massachusetts; provide the multitude of services needed to keep those living with HIV/AIDS connected with health care providers; and continue the public conversation about HIV needed to reduce the stigma that is still so closely associated with this disease.”

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. He should not have ran in the first place. Embarrassing.

    Posted by: Tad | Mar 27, 2014 12:21:25 PM


  2. The schtick with his Tea Party dad was tacky. I'm in favor of more HIV+ people being open, but this guys needs a bit more of a filter.

    Posted by: DW | Mar 27, 2014 12:28:36 PM


  3. @Tad - How is he an embarrassment, exactly?

    Posted by: Gregory In Seattle | Mar 27, 2014 12:29:58 PM


  4. Why did he even run the first place?

    Posted by: Phoenix Justice | Mar 27, 2014 12:30:13 PM


  5. It doesn't say when he discovered his status. Perhaps he just found out. It would be a hard thing to be in politics with that condition...poetntially open to attempts at blackmail, or simple smears. He has done nothing wrong that I can see. I see no reason he should be criticized for his actions here. I am sorry to hear about his health problems and wish him well.

    Posted by: jmartindale | Mar 27, 2014 12:37:12 PM


  6. Because he spent time trying to mount a campaign and convince voters he was genuinely interested in being an effective politician. He made himself a public spectacle with advertisements - and then decided to throw it all away.

    Posted by: Tad | Mar 27, 2014 12:37:50 PM


  7. @Tad. What's embarrassing is your grammar!

    Posted by: Paul | Mar 27, 2014 12:50:48 PM


  8. So why is he resigning ?
    I don't see anything too onerous in managing his health status and his public duties.

    Just get on with it dude.
    You'll get more respect by standing up and doing battle; but getting out of your public office duties just because you are positive is a poor start towards "continuing the conversation about HIV."
    You would be better off continuing that battle in the Legislature, securing programmes and social support.
    You seem to have put your personal issues under a magnifying glass.
    HIV has been managed by others.

    Posted by: JackFknTwist | Mar 27, 2014 12:56:20 PM


  9. @JackFknTwist Did you bother to read more than half the headline? He's leaving to RUN AIDS ACTION.

    Posted by: Jake | Mar 27, 2014 12:59:16 PM


  10. @TAD you’re right, he is an embarrassment because either he had HIV all along and should have disclosed that to the voters before running for public office or he contracted HIV after getting married and he plays right into the "gays are promiscuous" cliché.

    No matter what, he didn’t act in the best interest of the people he represents and that is embarrassing.

    Posted by: Will | Mar 27, 2014 1:01:20 PM


  11. I'm no fan of elected officials leaving before the end of their term, but this aint exactly Palin politics. He has served for years and is only shy of his term by a few months.

    Posted by: John | Mar 27, 2014 1:05:46 PM


  12. He shouldn't have had to disclose this to voters necessarily - does it really make a difference when serving in most any job? I think it's more silly he's resigning - because it seems unnecessary and perpetuates the HIV stigma - unless he just really wants to resign for other reasons.

    Posted by: JJJJJJ | Mar 27, 2014 1:07:36 PM


  13. He shouldn't have had to disclose this to voters necessarily - does it really make a difference when serving in most any job? I think it's more silly he's resigning - because it seems unnecessary and perpetuates the HIV stigma - unless he just really wants to resign for other reasons.

    Posted by: JJJJJJ | Mar 27, 2014 1:07:37 PM


  14. I should add - I'm glad he's openly discussing his status.

    Posted by: JJJJJJ | Mar 27, 2014 1:08:27 PM


  15. It's pathetic because there is no reason he had to get HIV. He has compromised his health and possibly the health of others. And he will needlessly tax the health care system, depriving resources to others.

    He's irresponsible. And we can add NYC Council member Corey Johnson to the list of pathetic irresponsible losers.

    You object because you think this is "shaming" or "stigmatizing"? Good! It should be stigmatizing to acquire and spread a deadly disease. This is what a life of hookups and Grindr encounters and bars will lead to. Stop it already.

    Posted by: Jack | Mar 27, 2014 1:12:10 PM


  16. Geez, read it first before commenting. Carl being HIV+ positive has nothing to do with his resigning. Well, not in the manner that he is being forced to resign. He is resigning his seat to become the head of the AIDS Action Committee, which is one of the oldest HIV/AIDS organization in Massachusetts. And he will become the first HIV+ head of that organization, which I think is a good thing.

    I live in one of the cities he represented, and I can tell you, if he disclosed this during a campaign, I don't think it would've made any difference, just based on the makeup of his district. I did see it mentioned that he has known his status for years, though he didn't say how many. But it really doesn't matter.

    I wish Carl success at AAC, he has always been dedicated to public health issues, and this is one that is very dear to him. I think it was an opportunity he couldn't pass up.

    Posted by: Doug | Mar 27, 2014 1:19:32 PM


  17. Jack, You are a bit judgmental. No, let me put it differently. F*ck you, you stupid SOB. May you die a lonely, painful death derided and despised by all around you.

    Posted by: jmartindale | Mar 27, 2014 1:20:18 PM


  18. What's with all the judgey comments about HIV? Sex is messy business and sometimes things happen.

    His status isn't the reason he's leaving his position. He's leaving for a different opportunity. I don't like it when we lose a sitting Dem but in this case, I suspect his experience, personal and professional, will make him a great asset to Aids Action.

    Posted by: pete n sfo | Mar 27, 2014 1:22:25 PM


  19. How funny is it that he is going to an AIDS prevention group. How is he qualified to teach anyone? He is an example of how not to act.

    Posted by: Demar | Mar 27, 2014 1:26:19 PM


  20. I can't believe the amount of hostility from some of the posters here, especially Jack and Tad. You two need to get a bloody education and stop being such judgmental pricks. As Doug points out he has been in office for some time and is leaving to take a position that is a great opportunity. Demar you’re another idiot with your entire comment.

    Posted by: JM | Mar 27, 2014 1:29:43 PM


  21. "What's with all the judgey comments about HIV? Sex is messy business and sometimes things happen."

    Pete, you're a sick f*ck. Srsly, how did you become this way? Things happen? This is a life-threatening illness. If you fail to take it seriously, then you should be held morally accountable. If you don't think that compromising human health and taking human lives warrants moral judgment, then there is something fundamentally wrong with you. You should probably be on a law enforcement watch list.

    It is also hard to see how anyone could be considered progressive if they rob poor people of limited health resources because they couldn't control their sexual behavior.

    Posted by: Tommy | Mar 27, 2014 1:32:51 PM


  22. Wow..pulled a Sarah Palin didn't he?

    Posted by: voice | Mar 27, 2014 1:35:47 PM


  23. JMartindale,

    Lol! So your message is: 1) it is bad to link disease to moral judgment and 2) "stupid SOBs" deserve to die horrible deaths from disease. OK, then.

    Anyway, I won't wish the same on you because I actually value human life. I don't wish disease and death on anyone. It is too bad you and Sciortino don't feel the same way.

    And believe me, I am well educated about HIV. That is why I don't have it.

    I think the lack of education lies with the folks who keep getting it in 2014. It isn't a lack of education about the mechanics of transmission. It is a lack of moral education about the gravity of the issue and about the need to stop using sex as a long-term recreational outlet with strangers. Even if you avoid HIV and the 2 dozen other prevalent STIs, over the long term, you are still far more likely to experience stress, depression, anxiety, loneliness, social isolation, drug and alcohol abuse, etc.

    When it goes beyond a few years, the hookup life is a disaster. It isn't worth it.

    Posted by: Jack | Mar 27, 2014 1:43:47 PM


  24. Carl didn't resign because he is HIV positive. He resigned because he has the chance to run a fantastic organization helping people like himself, who are HIV positive or who have AIDS. That's it.

    Plenty of elected officials are living with HIV, and it's immaterial to their public service.

    To the commentators more interested in policing the personal health or private sex lives of elected officials, go to hell you evil trolls.

    Posted by: reader | Mar 27, 2014 1:45:22 PM


  25. All you so called morallity police on here are worse than the deceased Fred Phelps and his cult. More than likely, you are just one troll from said cult polluting this site with your ignorance and bile. You haven't the slightest idea the circumstances of his positive status, not when, how or from whom he was exposed, yet here you are blathering on all preachy and holier-than-thou as if you do. F%*k off! If you are gay, you are an embarrassment to the LGBT community and should just go find yourselves some "reparative therapy" or at the very least see a qualified mental health therapist!

    Posted by: Kenneth | Mar 27, 2014 2:15:15 PM


  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment







Trending


« «Billy Eichner and Lindsay Lohan Destroy a Car in 'How I Met Your Mother' Rage: VIDEO« «