Scientist Bill Nye uses emojis to explain the theory of evolution in a recent YouTube video. Right wingers will no doubt continue to deny evolution's validity despite how easy Nye makes the subject to understand. Watch Nye break things down in a digestible, fun way for the rest of us AFTER THE JUMP...
Bill Nye Hub
As is becoming standard, it takes a fake news comedy show rather than major news outlets to report on the facts as they are instead of catering to excessive spin, bias, and false equivalencies.
On this past Sunday's Last Week Tonight, host John Oliver shines a light on the absurdity surrounding the climate change "debate." What he points out is that the major news outlets frame the debates with a one-on-one false equivalency, typically with "bullying scare-monger" Bill Nye arguing for the existence of climate change and "some dude" against, giving the misleading impression that the topic is still open for debate.
Oliver decides to balance things out a bit on his show and has Bill Nye, along with 96 others, argue against 3 "deniers" for what he calls "A Stastically Representative Climate Change Debate." Bedlam ensues after about half a second.
You can watch Oliver's report and subsequent debate AFTER THE JUMP...
This Sunday on Meet the Press, Bill Nye "The Science Guy" and Republican Congresswoman Marsha Blackburn (TN) sat down with David Gregory to discuss the science of climate change and whether a correlation can be discerned between America's recent bouts of extreme weather and human created climate change. However, the conversation was stunted by Congresswoman Blackburn's apparent refusal to concede that climate change is real, man-made or possibly influencing weather events such as the Polar Vortex or the drought in California, as Time points out:
“Neither [Bill Nye] nor I are a climate scientist. He is an engineer and actor, I am a member of Congress. And what we have to do is look at the information that we get from climate scientists,” said Blackburn. “There is not agreement around the fact of exactly what is causing this.”
Nye was less than receptive to the congresswoman's introduction of "doubt" into the equation:
“We have overwhelming evidence that the climate is changing. That you cannot tie any one event to that is not the same as doubt about the whole thing,” said Nye. “There is no debate in the scientific community. I encourage the Congresswoman to really look at the facts. You are our leader. We need you to change things, not deny what’s happening...For me, as a guy who grew up in the U.S., I want the U.S. to lead the world in this,” he said. “These are huge opportunities, and the more we mess around with this denial, the less we’re going to get done.”
Get schooled, AFTER THE JUMP...
Televangelist Pat Robertson reacted to last night's debate between 'Science Guy' Bill Nye and creationist Ken Ham by attacking Ham.
Robertson doesn't "believe in evolution as nontheistic" but he begs creationist Ken Ham to "not make a joke of ourselves" with his ridiculous theory that everything on Earth has been around for a few thousand years.:
"Let’s face it, there was a bishop [Ussher] who added up the dates listed in Genesis and he came up with the world had been around for 6,000 years. There ain’t no way that’s possible. To say that it all came about in 6,000 years is just nonsense and I think it’s time we come off of that stuff and say this isn’t possible."
He added: "Let’s be real, let’s not make a joke of ourselves."
Watch, AFTER THE JUMP...
BY DAVID TRIFUNOV / GlobalPost
After posting opposing YouTube videos about creation vs. evolution, Bill Nye "the Science Guy" and Creation Musem founder Ken Ham debate the origins of man.
Watch the full debate, AFTER THE JUMP...
This we can’t argue: Bill Nye’s debate with Ken Ham on Tuesday night in Kentucky sparked healthy discussion about heady topics. After that, well … it gets tougher.
Here’s what all the fuss was about. Nye we all know. He’s “the Science Guy” of TV fame. Winner of Emmy awards, dancer with the stars and best buds with some guy named Obama. Ham is popular in his own right, too. He’s CEO of the Answers in Genesis ministry and founder of the Creation Museum, a facility that’s boasted two million visitors since 2007.
They posted dueling YouTube videos last year, with Nye suggesting kids must be protected from creationist thinking. Ham countered with a roster of accomplished scientists committed to the Bible’s version of events. They continued the argument on Tuesday in Petersburg, Ken., inside the Creation Museum, speaking for about 2 ½ hours.
Here’s where the debate focused: Is creation a viable model of origins in today’s modern scientific era?
Declaring a clear winner isn’t going to happen because both sides are firmly entrenched. Still, since you’ve lasted with us this long, we should probably get off the fence and tell you this: Nye won by a landslide.
Why? He presented evidence that’s hard to refute, something we can all relate to, he counted the rings on trees.
It seems abundantly plausible to anyone who has ever chopped fire wood that the single ring of a tree stump represents one year in that tree’s life.
So as Ham based his entire argument on the assumption earth is only 6,000 years old, Nye showed pictures of a tree called Old Tjikko. One of the world’s largest trees – a Norway spruce located in, oddly enough, Sweden – if you count the rings you’ll find 9,550 of them.
To that, Nye asked: “How could these trees be there if there was an enormous flood 4,000 years ago?”
Here’s what else we learned:
It was widely popular.
CNN reporter Tom Foreman, who mediated, told the sold-out auditorium of about 900 people that “hundreds of thousands” were watching online. He said representatives from 70 media organizations attended the event.
Both men are accomplished academics and speakers.
Nye has won 18 Emmy awards and continues to host and produce television programs. He’s a mechanical engineer by trade, and is executive director of The Planetary Society, the world’s large space interest organization. He’s also adamant science education is vital if the United States wants to remain a world power.
“Without scientists and engineers to create new technologies and ways of doing society’s business, other economies in other countries will out-compete the United States and leave our citizens behind,” he wrote on CNN.com explaining why he accepted the debate.
Ham is a transplanted Australian who also has a science degree (environmental biology), and has appeared on a raft of TV shows, from CNN’s The Situation Room to Fox and Friends.
Noah’s ark was the focal point.
The Bible preaches that God cleaned the slate 4,000 years ago, telling Noah to collect two of every animal and 14,000 righteous followers as 40 days of rain fell on the earth. Nye said if the ark was built in the Middle East, how did kangaroos end up on board, and how did they get back to Australia?
“You don’t want to raise a generation of science students who don’t understand how we know our place in the cosmos,” Nye said.
They were unapologetically polite.
Nye reminded his audience that he’s not against spirituality. He said millions of scientists find comfort in religion, but many of them can’t accept Ham’s assertions. Ham suggested science and religion are linked.
“It doesn’t matter if you’re a creationist or an evolutionist. You can be a great scientist,” Ham said.
Neither conceded defeat.
During a Q&A after the formal debate, they were asked what would sway them to the other side. Nye said “we would just need one piece of evidence” from his opponent, while Ham said nothing could persuade him “the word of God is not true.”
Watch the full debate, AFTER THE JUMP...
To "Weird Science", naturally.
Watch, AFTER THE JUMP...