Colonel Om Prakash, who now works in the office of Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, writes in a new article in the Pentagon's top scholarly journal: "After a careful examination, there is no scientific evidence to support
the claim that unit cohesion will be negatively affected if homosexuals
serve openly. Based on this research,
it is not time for the administration to reexamine the issue; rather it
is time for the administration to examine how to implement the repeal
of the ban."
The Boston Globe reports: "The article in the upcoming issue of
Joint Force Quarterly, which is published for the chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, was written by an Air Force colonel who studied the
issue for months while a student at the National Defense University in
Washington and who concludes that having openly gay troops in the ranks
will not hurt combat readiness. The
views do not necessarily reflect those of Pentagon leaders, but their
appearance in a publication billed as the Joint Chiefs' 'flagship'
security studies journal signals that the top brass now welcomes a
debate in the military over repealing the 1993 law that requires gays
to hide their sexual orientation, according to several longtime
observers of the charged debate over gays in the military. While
decisions on which articles to publish are made by the journal's
editorial board, located at the defense university, a senior military
official said yesterday that the office of Admiral Mike Mullen, the
Joint Chiefs chairman who is the nation's top military officer,
reviewed the article before it was published."
In the article, Prakash writes: "The law also forces unusual personal
compromises wholly inconsistent with a core military value –
integrity…Several homosexuals interviewed were in tears
as they described the enormous personal compromise in integrity they
had been making, and the pain felt in serving in an organization they
wholly believed in, yet that did not accept them…In an attempt to allow homosexual service members to serve
quietly, a law was created that forces a compromise in integrity,
conflicts with the American creed of ‘equality for all,' places
commanders in difficult moral dilemmas, and is ultimately more damaging
to the unit cohesion its stated purpose is to preserve.''
The Globe notes that the article "is likely to increase pressure on President Obama to fulfill his
campaign pledge to work with Congress to overturn the 1993 law commonly
referred to as 'don't ask, don't tell.'"
Pentagon Airs Criticism of 'Don't Ask' [boston globe]
