• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Body
  • Daily Resist
  • POLITICS
  • Travel
  • Music
  • Theatre
  • Film
  • TV
  • Business
  • Men
  • Marriage Equality
  • Space
  • Trans Rights
  • Books
  • Science
  • Gay Iconography
  • TowleREAD

Marriage at the Supreme Court 2.0 Analysis: Why a Sex Discrimination Ruling is No Victory At All

Ari Ezra Waldman April 30, 2015

BY ARI EZRA WALDMAN

J_robertsDuring oral argument in Obergefell v. Hodges, the same-sex marriage case, Chief Justice John Roberts asked an important, substantive question that had some commentators scratching their heads. The plaintiffs’ lawyer had just made the argument that bans on gays marrying amounts to discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Then, the Chief Justice said:

I’m not sure it’s necessary to get into sexual orientation to resolve this case. I mean, if Sue loves Joe and Tom loves Joe, Sue can marry him and Tom can’t. And the difference is based upon their different sex. Why isn’t that a straightforward question of sexual discrimination?

In a way, he’s right. Sue can marry Joe because she’s a woman; Tom can’t marry Joe because he’s a man. That’s sex discrimination. And although this seems pretty obvious, the argument got scant attention in the volumes of briefs before the Court in Obergefell and was raised only a few times during the post-Windsor onslaught of cases over the last two years.

That is not to say that the sex discrimination argument is entirely foreign to the marriage equality movement. Indeed, as Northwestern Law Professor Andrew Koppelman and George Mason Law Professor Ilya Somin noted in their Obergefell amicus brief, some of the first generation of marriage equality cases relied on a sex discrimination rationale. And if his question is any indication of his ultimate opinion — a dubious correlation, however — the Chief Justice could be another vote in favor of marriage equality.

Perhaps most gay couples yearning to marry don’t care how we get to a nationwide freedom to marry, just as long as we get there in the end. After all, a win is a win is a win. But a sex discrimination argument would be like winning a battle because the enemy engaged in a strategic retreat: it is not only unsatisfying, it doesn’t answer the ultimate question of who wins the war. It leaves gay persons without necessary constitutional protections and opens us up to myriad forms of discrimination. Arguing that gay marriage bans are examples of sex discrimination is a half truth: they may be discriminating on the basis of sex, but they absolutely discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, as well. To ignore the latter just because the former is a little easier offers tacit approval for antigay discrimination.

I tease out the sex discrimination argument, explain why it should be discarded, and speculate on how the argument could play out in June, AFTER THE JUMP…

ScotusKoppelman’s and Somin’s argument is, in brief, that the Supreme Court should invalidate all state level bans on gays marrying because those laws discriminate on the basis of sex. The basic theory is clear: a man can marry a woman, but man cannot marry a man, so he is being discriminated against because he’s a man; if he were a woman, s/he could marry a man.

This is the path to take, Koppelman and Somin suggest, because it’s easier. It doesn’t require the Court to break new ground, create new levels of scrutiny, and elucidate a sexual orientation discrimination constitutional doctrine. We already have a sex discrimination rule, which gives incidents of sex discrimination at the hands of the state heightened scrutiny. Under old precedent, therefore, Obergefell is open and shut.

The problems with this argument are manifold.

It’s central failing is why even conservatives like the Chief Justice may be inclined to adopt it. Conservatives are not “there” yet when it comes to homosexuality, in general, and antigay discrimination, in particular. For various reasons — religion, morality, Burkean conservatism — they are uncomfortable setting precedent that would prohibit individuals from discriminating against gays. And yet if you are, say, a young conservative jurist who will likely preside over a Supreme Court for at least another 20 or 30 years and do not want to occupy a place in the historical trash heap as just another hateful white man, you are going to want to find a middle way that allows gays to marry without saying that gays have a constitutional right not to be discriminated against.

And therein lies the problem with using the sex discrimination argument to win this battle. It could lose us the war, or, at best, set us back years.

There are countless examples of discrimination faced by gay persons that do not also constitute sex discrimination, but the many forms of employment discrimination are paradigmatic. In 31 states, you can be fired simply for being gay. That’s not sex discrimination: it’s not as if the fired employee would have been saved had he or she had different sexual organs.

The sex discrimination is not only bad for the long term legal health of our community. It also ignores the fact that bans on gays marrying is in fact sexual orientation discrimination! That cannot be ignored. If you ban an entire group of people, coherent based on their sexual orientation identity, from participating in an institution for the sole reason of their sexual orientation identity, that is not only sexual orientation discrimination, but it is also odious under the Fourteenth Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection to all persons.

GinsburgThere are five justices of the Supreme Court who already realize this. The progressives, led by Justice Ginsburg, are not going to fall for the trap of sex discrimination. Nor will Justice Kennedy, who had the opportunity to use the sex discrimination argument before, but instead chose to speak eloquently about the dignity of all gay persons and their children. Justice Kennedy brought up that inherent dignity in his questions during oral argument, suggesting he is hewing close to the equality doctrine he has developed since Romer.

If the Chief Justice is thinking strategically, he may offer a concurring opinion suggesting that the Court need not reach issues of sexual orientation discrimination because sex discrimination is already a easy weapon to use. I doubt he could get Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan on board. I hold some concerns about Justice Breyer, the consummate moderate that he is, but those are relatively fleeting. More likely, the Chief Justice floats this idea in conference and it goes nowhere, at which point he goes back to a 4-justice minority.

***

Follow me on Twitter.

Ari Ezra Waldman is Associate Professor of Law and the Director of the Institute for Information Law and Policy at New York Law School. He holds a Ph.D. from Columbia University, a J.D. from Harvard Law School, and a B.A. from Harvard College. Ari writes regular posts on law and various LGBT issues.

Topics: News, Supreme Court More Posts About: Ari Ezra Waldman, gay marriage, John Roberts, Law - Gay, LGBT, News, Supreme Court

Related Posts
  • Protesters Dressed As ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ Gather Outside Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Home Ahead Of Roe v. Wade Vote
  • Gay marriage, other rights at risk after U.S. Supreme Court abortion move
  • After long fight, Christian right poised for major victory on abortion
  • Explicit Photos To Blame? ‘Speechless’ Madonna Is Outraged After Being BLOCKED From Instagram Live

    Explicit Photos To Blame? ‘Speechless’ Madonna Is Outraged After Being BLOCKED From Instagram Live

    Published by Radar Online KCS Presse / MEGA Madonna was in utter shock to discover that Instagram had blocked her from going live, sharing a video of the awkward moment she found out on Friday. “What …Read More »
  • US archbishop bans Pelosi from communion over abortion rights support

    US archbishop bans Pelosi from communion over abortion rights support

    Published by AFP Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, a lifelong Catholic, has been barred from holy communion by the archbishop of San Francisco over her support for abortion San Francisco (AFP) – The …Read More »
  • Giuliani meets with U.S. House Jan. 6 panel, CNN reports

    Giuliani meets with U.S. House Jan. 6 panel, CNN reports

    Published by Reuters WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Rudy Giuliani, who served as former U.S. President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, met for more than nine hours on Friday with the House committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack …Read More »
  • WHO working on more monkeypox guidance as cases rise – senior adviser

    WHO working on more monkeypox guidance as cases rise – senior adviser

    Published by Reuters By Jennifer Rigby LONDON (Reuters) – The World Health Organization is working on further guidance for countries on how to mitigate the spread of monkeypox, amid concerns cases could spike further in the …Read More »
Previous Post: « Kristen Wiig Stops By ‘The Tonight Show’ As Game of Thrones’ Dragon Queen Khaleesi: VIDEO
Next Post: Airbnb Removes User Who Evicted Gay Couple From Home in Galveston, Texas: VIDEO »

Primary Sidebar

News

  • Harris, White House Spox Rip Oklahoma For Passing Near-Total Abortion Ban Weeks After Leaked Supreme Court Opinion

    Harris, White House Spox Rip Oklahoma For Passing Near-Total Abortion Ban Weeks After Leaked Supreme Court Opinion

  • Trump pays $110,000 fine for blocking New York state tax probe

    Trump pays $110,000 fine for blocking New York state tax probe

  • Erdogan demands concessions to back Swedish, Finnish NATO membership

    Erdogan demands concessions to back Swedish, Finnish NATO membership

  • Zelensky says Ukraine has ‘broken the backbone’ of the Russian army

    Zelensky says Ukraine has ‘broken the backbone’ of the Russian army

Break

  • Evan Spiegel & Miranda Kerr Pay Off $10 Million In Loans Of Otis College’s Graduating Class

    Evan Spiegel & Miranda Kerr Pay Off $10 Million In Loans Of Otis College’s Graduating Class

  • Vladimir Putin’s Daughter SECRETLY Living In Germany With Man Named Igor Zelensky

    Vladimir Putin’s Daughter SECRETLY Living In Germany With Man Named Igor Zelensky

  • Tucker Carlson: Voice of white America’s outrage and fears

    Tucker Carlson: Voice of white America’s outrage and fears

  • Viola Davis was called by director’s maid’s name

    Viola Davis was called by director’s maid’s name

RSS Partner Links

  • See the best of David’s exes on Schitt’s Creek!
  • How Tom Daley is celebrating his 28th b-day!
  • OMG, why not wear it?  Novel necklines fit for royalty
  • Walking In L.A.-uh!
  • OMG, have you heard? The Rihanna baby hath dropeth!
  • OMG, gaymers: ‘Logjam’ is the new BEAR ICON of the videogame world
  • Birthday Sluts
  • Song of the Day: 'Push It' by Salt-N-Pepa
  • Saturday 'Stache

Most Recent

  • Kate McKinnon Leaving SNL; What? Also Aidy Bryant, Pete Davidson  and Kyle Mooney Set to Depart After This Season.  Season Finale TONIGHT

    Kate McKinnon Leaving SNL; What? Also Aidy Bryant, Pete Davidson and Kyle Mooney Set to Depart After This Season. Season Finale TONIGHT

  • Explicit Photos To Blame? ‘Speechless’ Madonna Is Outraged After Being BLOCKED From Instagram Live

    Explicit Photos To Blame? ‘Speechless’ Madonna Is Outraged After Being BLOCKED From Instagram Live

  • US archbishop bans Pelosi from communion over abortion rights support

    US archbishop bans Pelosi from communion over abortion rights support

  • Giuliani meets with U.S. House Jan. 6 panel, CNN reports

    Giuliani meets with U.S. House Jan. 6 panel, CNN reports

  • WHO working on more monkeypox guidance as cases rise – senior adviser

    WHO working on more monkeypox guidance as cases rise – senior adviser

  • Belgian Pride festival returns to Brussels after two-year hiatus

    Belgian Pride festival returns to Brussels after two-year hiatus

  • Spain identifies possible new monkeypox cluster in Canaries

    Spain identifies possible new monkeypox cluster in Canaries

Most Commented

Social

Twitter @tlrd | Facebook | Instagram @tlrd
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · Log in