• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Travel
  • Sports
  • Law/Justice
  • Celebrities
  • Republicans
  • Madonna
  • Books
  • Men
  • Trans Rights
  • Royals
  • Monkeypox
  • Honor the past and celebrate the present with PRIDE | Opinion
  • Sex and the City author Candace Bushnell ‘did not get enough in royalties’
  • Tom Cruise ‘Would Love to Meet Someone Special’ After 3 Divorces: ‘He Believes the Right Girl Is Out There’

Break Glass: Supreme Court Leak of Draft Decision to Overturn Roe v Wade Abortion Rights Also Sets Up Supreme Court To Take On Gay Rights

Lisa Keen, Keen News Service May 3, 2022 Leave a Comment

supreme court leak supreme court roe v wade legal abortions

Supreme Court Leak: Guerrilla Girls Poster on Abortion Traditional Values Buy Your Own

Access to Abortion and LGBTQ Equality Overlap in Legal Arguments         

   In an unprecedented development, a purported draft of what is believed to be the U.S. Supreme Court’s upcoming ruling on abortion indicates not only that the court is poised to overturn its long-standing decisions protecting the right to abortion but that it is also laying the groundwork to overturn landmark pro-LGBT decisions.

            “LGBTQ people should recognize that we are once again in the crosshairs and that all of our hard-won protections are under serious threat,” said Shannon Minter, legal director for the National Center for Lesbian Rights.

            “If this really is the judgment of a majority of the Supreme Court,” said Jenny Pizer, law and policy director for Lambda Legal, “we have entered an era of arrogant judicial activism unlike anything this country has seen for a hundred years.”

“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,”

–Draft Supreme Court Desicion Obtained by Politico

            Nan Hunter, a veteran of many legal battles for LGBT equality, said the draft would almost certainly unleash “a rush by right wingers to get a challenge before the court” to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 decision which struck down state bans on marriage for same-sex couples.

            The abortion decision draft, first reported by Politico.com Monday night, appears to be authentic. But it is dated February, leaving open the possibility that it is not finalized. At least five justices must sign onto the final decision to carry the majority. Votes on some decisions in the past have changed very late in the process. Justices have sometimes voted with a majority view at first, then later changed their vote after reading the majority’s proposed decision. Also in the past, attempts to report the outcome of cases before the decisions were released have turned out to be wrong.

Supreme Court Leak Looks Legit          

Draft decision
1977 women’s conference in houston

  But most legal analysts Monday night said they believe the draft released Monday is authentic and that its being leaked represents a dramatic departure from the court’s efforts to avoid being influenced by political pressure.

            “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled,” states the draft decision in Dobbs v. Jackson, referring to Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

Roe, in 1973, said there is an implied right to privacy and liberty guaranteed by the Constitution that covers the right to choose an abortion. Casey, in 1992, said that states could regulate abortion once a fetus becomes viable as long as the regulations did not create an undue burden to women who seek an abortion.

      “If this really is the judgment of a majority of the Supreme Court, we have entered an era of arrogant judicial activism unlike anything this country has seen for a hundred years.”

–Jenny Pizer, law and policy director for Lambda Legal

            In language especially troubling to LGBT legal activists, the draft opinion in Dobbs, apparently penned by Justice Samuel Alito, states, “The Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision,” including the due process clause of the 14th Amendment. According to Alito, the only implicit rights the 14th Amendment due process clause protects must be “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition” and “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.”

            Alito’s draft says abortion is not one of those rights and, in language reminiscent of a 1986 decision that allowed states to ban same-sex sexual relations, he notes that three-fourths of states made abortion a crime when the 14th Amendment was adopted. The opinion further echoes the Bowers v. Hardwick decision when it notes that a right to abortion was “entirely unknown in American law” before the latter part of the 20th Century.

2c4214 7c9ea3e83c174b30a0c3323451b9bfc3
Pro choice with no nostalgia

            “If our due process rights to ‘ordered liberty’ are to be limited now to those rights respected by white male landowners wearing wigs and tri-cornered hats, the Constitution will fail utterly to do the job our founders intended it to do,” said Lambda’s Pizer. “And while it’s true that abortion is unique in some ways, its use as a political weapon to drive extreme-right voters is anything but, as state legislatures have proved again and again in recent times with frenzies of anti-LGBTQ bills.” 

            Alito’s draft also says that abortion is “critically different” and “fundamentally different” from some other rights that have been protected by the 14th Amendment– such as intimate sexual relations, contraception, and marriage—because abortion takes the life of an “unborn human being.”

            But activists were not much comforted by that distinction.

“Justice Alito badly wants to overrule Obergefell. What this opinion tells us is that he doesn’t have the votes to do so. If there were three other justices –beside him and Thomas– willing to end same-sex marriage, that would have been part of this decision.”   

Nan Hunter, LGBTQ Legal Veteran

            Evan Wolfson, a gay legal activist who was a key player in the legal and political battle for marriage equality, said Alito “leans on the distinctiveness of abortion and doesn’t necessarily go further (though we know he would like to).”

            Nan Hunter was more blunt: “Justice Alito badly wants to overrule Obergefell. What this opinion tells us is that he doesn’t have the votes to do so. If there were three other justices –beside him and Thomas– willing to end same-sex marriage, that would have been part of this decision.”       

            The apparent leaking of the draft decision has stirred almost as much controversy as the 98-page draft decision itself. The U.S. Supreme Court has a long-standing protocol of not signaling to the public how its decisions are developing. The assumed motivation behind this tradition is to prevent outside politics from putting pressure on the court’s legal analysis and reasoning. Some legal commentators Monday night were characterizing this leak as a blatant attempt to play politics with the final formulation of the court’s abortion opinion. But the pressure could have come from either side –from Alito, attempting to discourage any justice from abandoning his politically aggressive opinion, or from a pro-choice justice hoping public pressure would rattle any majority justice who was concerned about the far-reaching consequences of the opinion.

We don’t know if this will be the final decision, but it is shocking to read this assault on an established fundamental right.

Shanon Minter

“That someone leaked this opinion–violating the court’s most sacrosanct rule of confidentiality–speaks volumes about how extreme and dangerous much of the court’s jurisprudence has become,” said NCLR’s Minter. “We don’t know if this will be the final decision, but it is shocking to read this assault on an established fundamental right.”

            The case in question is Dobbs v. Jackson, in which an abortion clinic challenged a new law in Mississippi that banned abortion at any time after 15 weeks, unless there is a medical emergency or severe fetal abnormality. Most observers following the case and the court’s oral argument have predicted the Supreme Court majority would likely overturn Roe and Casey. But nearly everyone expected the decision to be released in late June, when the court typically releases its most controversial decisions.

            During oral argument December 1, the court discussed the implications for this case on two major LGBT decisions: Lawrence v. Texas and Obergefell v. Hodges. Lawrence ruled that states could not ban sexual relations between same-sex couples; Obergefell ruled that states could not ban same-sex couples from marrying.

“A court that would issue an opinion like this–if it does–is a court that has abandoned any pretense of protecting individual freedom,” said NCLR’s Minter. “…We have become too accustomed to counting on the courts for protection, and we must realize the days when we could safely do so are past. Our hope lies in joining forces with others who are fighting to protect democracy and the rule of law and to prevent our country from sliding into the same authoritarianism that is rising across the globe.”     

            “Whether or not this draft makes it into a majority opinion, and whether or not it later gets invoked in assaults on other rights, it’s already a firebell in the night,” said Evan Wolfson. And he said it underscores “the importance of voting out the Republicans who have conspired, lied, and court-packed to get our country to this ugly, divisive, corrosive moment.”

“The cure,” said Wolfson, “is to vote in representatives who will defend Americans’ rights and our constitutional democracy itself.” 

2c4214 a02bfb0777424072bcf337f23c726f89

Topics: towleroad, Featured, Law/Justice, Sex, Supreme Court More Posts About: Abortion, Bowers v. Hardwick, Judicial activism, Lawrence v. Texas, National Center for Lesbian Rights, Obergefell v. Hodges, Planned Parenthood v. Casey, Samuel Alito

Related Posts
  • U.S. Supreme Court rules against EPA in wetlands regulation challenge
  • Revealed: ‘Nominal Christians’ a top threat to right-wing group behind abortion pill ban
  • Why the overtly ‘partisan’ Supreme Court may kill federalism: journalism
  • Sex and the City author Candace Bushnell ‘did not get enough in royalties’

    Sex and the City author Candace Bushnell ‘did not get enough in royalties’

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Candace Bushnell “did not get the royalties she deserved” for ‘Sex and the City’. The 64-year-old author wrote a column for The New York Observer that was adapted into the bestselling …Read More »
  • Tom Cruise ‘Would Love to Meet Someone Special’ After 3 Divorces: ‘He Believes the Right Girl Is Out There’

    Tom Cruise ‘Would Love to Meet Someone Special’ After 3 Divorces: ‘He Believes the Right Girl Is Out There’

    Published by OK Magazine mega Tom Cruise is back on the prowl! The three-time divorced movie star has reportedly been in search of a new woman after being single for about a year. mega “Tom would …Read More »
  • Scores detained in Hong Kong on Tiananmen crackdown anniversary

    Scores detained in Hong Kong on Tiananmen crackdown anniversary

    Published by Reuters By Jessie Pang and Ben Blanchard HONG KONG/TAIPEI (Reuters) -Hong Kong police searched and detained scores of people on Sunday, including four arrested for “seditious” intent, as authorities tightened security for the 34th …Read More »
  • Kim Cattrall’s ‘Stipulations’ for ‘And Just Like That’ Cameo Revealed: ‘Refused to Film With Her Former Costars’ Including Sarah Jessica Parker

    Kim Cattrall’s ‘Stipulations’ for ‘And Just Like That’ Cameo Revealed: ‘Refused to Film With Her Former Costars’ Including Sarah Jessica Parker

    Published by OK Magazine mega Before Kim Cattrall could sign on to appear in And Just Like That Season 2, she had some demands that had to be met, including how she refused to film with …Read More »
Previous Post: « Philadelphia Enquirer: Malcolm Kenyatta is the Democrats’ future, so why can’t he be their present?
Next Post: U.S. lawmakers in 16 states to introduce laws to protect transgender youth »

Primary Sidebar

Adjacent News

  • Tennessee pride celebrations showcase queer joy amid neo-Nazi threats, legal attacks

    Tennessee pride celebrations showcase queer joy amid neo-Nazi threats, legal attacks

  • ‘It’s about self-care’: Lady Gaga thinks make-up can benefit mental health

    ‘It’s about self-care’: Lady Gaga thinks make-up can benefit mental health

  • Pregnant transgender man featured on cover of Glamour magazine

    Pregnant transgender man featured on cover of Glamour magazine

Good Trash: Going to Read It Somewhere, Y'know

  • Kelly Ripa Savagely Exposes Andy Cohen After He Sent Her a ‘Completely Erect’ NSFW Photo From Potential Suitor

    Kelly Ripa Savagely Exposes Andy Cohen After He Sent Her a ‘Completely Erect’ NSFW Photo From Potential Suitor

  • Elliot Page reveals he was told by A-list actor: ‘I’m going to f*** you to make you realise you aren’t gay’

    Elliot Page reveals he was told by A-list actor: ‘I’m going to f*** you to make you realise you aren’t gay’

  • Andy Cohen Admits Further Plastic Surgery Discussions Were Cut From ‘KUWTK’ Reunion Special: ‘People Would Be Really Surprised’

    Andy Cohen Admits Further Plastic Surgery Discussions Were Cut From ‘KUWTK’ Reunion Special: ‘People Would Be Really Surprised’

Partner Links

  • Prince Harry skipped the first day of the Mirror trial, he only flew in late last night
  • King Charles is giving up Llwynywermod, his 192-acre estate in Wales
  • Morning Round-Up: Elliot Page; Robert Garcia; David Burtka; Jake Shears; WeHo Pride; Julio Rodriguez & more!
  • We Have The Same Paws!
  • Putin Puppet Calls For 'Final Solution' In Ukraine

Most Recent

  • Honor the past and celebrate the present with PRIDE | Opinion

    Honor the past and celebrate the present with PRIDE | Opinion

  • Sex and the City author Candace Bushnell ‘did not get enough in royalties’

    Sex and the City author Candace Bushnell ‘did not get enough in royalties’

  • Tom Cruise ‘Would Love to Meet Someone Special’ After 3 Divorces: ‘He Believes the Right Girl Is Out There’

    Tom Cruise ‘Would Love to Meet Someone Special’ After 3 Divorces: ‘He Believes the Right Girl Is Out There’

  • Scores detained in Hong Kong on Tiananmen crackdown anniversary

    Scores detained in Hong Kong on Tiananmen crackdown anniversary

  • Kim Cattrall’s ‘Stipulations’ for ‘And Just Like That’ Cameo Revealed: ‘Refused to Film With Her Former Costars’ Including Sarah Jessica Parker

    Kim Cattrall’s ‘Stipulations’ for ‘And Just Like That’ Cameo Revealed: ‘Refused to Film With Her Former Costars’ Including Sarah Jessica Parker

  • Thai PM frontrunner attends Pride parade, promising same-sex marriage, gender identity rights

    Thai PM frontrunner attends Pride parade, promising same-sex marriage, gender identity rights

  • Kim Cattrall has ‘moved on’ from Sex and the City

    Kim Cattrall has ‘moved on’ from Sex and the City

  • Eddie Izzard says they are now called ‘Suzy’ and don’t mind being called ‘she, her, he, or him’

    Eddie Izzard says they are now called ‘Suzy’ and don’t mind being called ‘she, her, he, or him’

Most Commented

Social

Twitter @tlrd | Facebook | Instagram @tlrd

Footer

Copyright © 2023 · Log in

×