Ann Coulter | Elections | News | Republican Party

Ann Coulter to be Investigated for Voting Fraud

PieholeI mentioned it briefly some time ago when it was discovered that Ann Coulter had used an address that wasn't her own when voting in Palm Beach county in Florida. Now it appears to be catching up with her.

Allegations that Ann Coulter voted knowingly in the wrong South Florida precinct February 7 will be referred to the state attorney "within 48 hours," Palm Beach election supervisor Arthur Anderson said yesterday.

Coulter's registration showed an address that wasn't hers. Coulter listed the address of her realtor, though the realtor, Suzanne Frisbie, says she wasn't living there.

According to Anderson, since the charges of fraud arose, Coulter has made "efforts to distract and divert focus on the process regarding this complaint."

What will her piehole have to say about this?

You may have missed...
Silent Ill [tr]
Ann Coulter Calls Al Gore a "Total Fag" [tr]
Turning in her Grave [tr]

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. Omg, I am truly more at a loss for the people that try to puch peoples buttons on these blogs. Rudy, if you seriously believe a gay man equates being insane and crazy with gay you have some serious unconscious demons to face. Truthfully, I think you're just bored and looking to get a rise out of people, as is often the case with certain people that like to debate and throw insults on these blogs...

    And Larry, I couldn't agree more, I am continually growing weary of this world and this country. The Republikkklan party is increasingly hostile, ignorant, malisious and unrelenting. It's frightening...

    Posted by: Cory | Nov 2, 2006 12:29:05 PM


  2. Two books that I recently started reading both discuss Coulter, as well as many other players in the extreme right. "What Liberal Media?" and "Blinded by the Right" reveal intricacies of a highly funded information fraud industry and premeditated demagoguery that left even moi, Towleroad's resident cynic, with his mouth agape.

    EVERY subject that should concern us are discussed therein: Coulter, Rove, Bush, Reagan, Nixon, Bork, the Olsens, Scaife's mulitmillion dollar bankrolling of all kinds of American fascism including his goal to destroy the Clintons regardless of the cost in money and Truth, the ancien cons, the neocons, the Goldbergs, the Kristols, the Podhoretz, the Coors family-seeded Heritage Foundation, the Federalist Society, Fleischer, Bennett, O'Reilly, Limbaugh, Will, Sullivan, Krauthammer, Buckley, Carlson, Matthews, Drudge [and whom he wanted to be his "fuck buddy"], Rev. Moon, broadcast network news, cable news, talk radio, the conspiracy of lies to discredit Anita Hill, the 2000 election and the GOP's initial game plan for discrediting its results when they miscalculated that Bush would win the popular vote [which, of course, he did not] but lose the Electoral College [which, of course, he did], and their manipulations in Florida, at the Supreme Court, and in newsrooms all acrosss the country and the Gore campaign's impotent response, gay rights, abortion rights, Iraq, et al., etc.

    "What..." is extensively documented, and "Blinded..." is the first-person, behind the scenes mea maxima culpa of gay David Brock, Coulter's former friend, who received hosannas and beaucoup bucks from the right wing as long as he was their eager hatchet man, but who became another victim of the elaborate partisan attack machine of which he had been a part when his book about Hillary was not the crucifixion they demanded. We can never know if he would have returned to the progressive philosophy of his youth, had his sight restored, had that not occured any more than we can know whether Sir Lancelot would ever have publicly come out were it not for Perez. Regardless, we benefit from both, and readers gay and nongay can benefit far more from digesting the contents of these two books than swallowing a certain someone's load...of military porn.

    Posted by: Leland | Nov 2, 2006 12:42:21 PM


  3. Leland...the Olsen twins are Republicans?

    Posted by: peterparker | Nov 2, 2006 1:01:03 PM


  4. This news item feels like the equivelant of a bank robber getting arrested for shop-lifting. Hasn't Ann Coulter done far worse things than cast one vote from the wrong locale? Perspective!!

    Posted by: Shawn | Nov 2, 2006 1:02:03 PM


  5. It is ironic that she may get her voting rights taken away for something so lame. Hey they finally threw Capote in jail for tax evasion. Either way it is sweet to see that bitch in trouble.

    I still say she's a man, no one has bigger balls than her.

    Posted by: patrick nyc | Nov 2, 2006 1:13:36 PM


  6. This woman should just shut the fuck up! they even had Calista Flockharts character "Kitty" on Brothers and Sisters do her, Where was Canada in Iraq? since she stated we were in Vietnam. Not!!!! I hope she enjoys her upcoming career as the auto centre clerk in some skank Wal-Mart in Buttfuck Texas! that's where she will end up! Or better yet some J-list (too low for the D-list) Celebrity doing Grand Openings at a local Best Buy. she's heading there just watch! She will be the cause of her own demise.

    Posted by: Darrell | Nov 2, 2006 1:18:22 PM


  7. Darrell,
    We don't want the CUNT in Texas. We are already hosting the Bushes.

    Posted by: Blair | Nov 2, 2006 1:27:53 PM


  8. Leland, you are the classic example of scratching a cynic to find an idealist inside.

    Posted by: Anon | Nov 2, 2006 1:45:13 PM


  9. Cory, Please re-read Rob's posts and my re-posts. I said in my first post that I did not believe that he was intending to draw the conclusion that he had written. Nevertheless, he was the one who concluded that Coulter must be incomprehensible, crazy, or a terrible person because she (or her father or boyfriend) was gay. That was illogical and self-loathing but it was what he wrote. If you want to have an exlcusively internal gay debating society governed by politically correct rules that is far different from my goal. I am neither bored nor enjoy pusing someone's buttons simply for the sake of getting a rise out of him. I do not, however, think we should encourage or tolerate sloppy thinking and writing. The stakes--our civil rights--are simply too great.

    Posted by: rudy | Nov 2, 2006 1:55:04 PM


  10. Capone Patrick NYC? I believe Capote voluntarily entered the jail to consort with his paramour. Typos can be elucidating.

    Posted by: rudy | Nov 2, 2006 2:23:18 PM


  11. LOL, Peter, good catch! I have no idea if the Olsen Twins political judgment is as bad as their taste in clothes, but, MEA culpa, I was referring, even though I misspelled the name, to Ted Olson, an Assistant Attorney General, uh hum, under Reagan, and onetime US Solicitor General [a position called “the 10th member of the Supreme Court”] under George II after being his lead attorney in Bush v. Gore [earlier, he also defended Colorado's antigay amendment before the Court]. Despite his denials during his USSG hearings, he was extensively involved in various aspects of the Scaife $2.3-million financed “Arkansas Project” [Paula Jones, Vincent Foster, Whitewater, Troopergate, Cheeseburgergate] devoted to discrediting the Clintons. Brock testified against him to no avail.

    His blond wife, Barbara, who quickly informed former fair child Brock that he was no longer welcome in their circle after he failed to adequately vilify Hillary, died in the plane that crashed into the Pentagon on 9/11, after years as a regular right wing witch with a smile on cable “news” shows and scrawling her own vicious book on Hillary called, “Hell to Pay.” Ironic given her own demise. Sue me.

    Her mourning close friend Ann Coulter used her death as an excuse to say, "[Ted and Barbara Olson's] was a relationship that could only be cheaply imitated by Bill and Hillary."

    PS: Anyone in Connecticut still considering voting for Friend of George Joe Lieberman should know that the same Richard Scaife has donated to his campaign.

    http://www.nedlamont.com/page/-/Images/scafie.jpg

    As Taylor Marsh has written at the Huffington Post:

    “No wonder The New York Times just endorsed Ned Lamont. Joe Lieberman has no shame. He'll do anything, take anyone's money in order to win. But money from Richard Mellon Scaife? No Democrat would do that, because Scaife simply doesn't give money to Democrats. What does that say about Joe?”

    Posted by: Leland | Nov 2, 2006 2:28:06 PM


  12. Considering her writing is a poorly researched and written Hate Crime against humanity, can't we lock her up on a few more charges?

    Posted by: Marco | Nov 2, 2006 2:50:38 PM


  13. Well, it's rough out here for an ugly girl. Have some sympathy for Miss Ann, she's looked that way all her days. Po' thang.

    Posted by: Derrick from Philly | Nov 2, 2006 4:50:21 PM


  14. Ooo, Rudy, harsh.

    I was merely wondering what it was that made Ann HATE so much, not that I feel she's justified to do so. Was she angry her first boyfriend was gay? Is she angry a relative a gay? Is she angry she's gay?

    It's a matter of misinterpretation. I didn't imagine anyone would ever think I felt as she appears to feel. I'll try to do better next time. You are right, however. Considering what is at stake there is little to no room for error.

    Posted by: Rob (lrdarystar) | Nov 2, 2006 7:16:11 PM


  15. Rob, You are a gentleman. We are on the same side in this war for our civil rights. I just want our soldiers to be as well prepared as possible. I apologize if I was needlessly harsh. As a veteran of too many battles over too many years I focus on rhetorical weakness. I am an attorney; words are my tools. I hope (and strive) to use them to strenthen our family. (Although I have been known to revert to my roots as an Hispanic cowboy and repsond physically when a family member is attacked by a bigot or a homophobe.) I didn't date a boxer in high school for nothing! Know that I have your back.

    Posted by: rudy | Nov 3, 2006 11:51:38 AM


  16. « 1 2

Post a comment







Trending


« «Neil Patrick Harris Publicist: He's Not Gay« «