04/17/2007
Jonathan Roberts Chest Wax on Dancing with the Stars
Dancing with the Stars has become a secret guilty pleasure for me. I resisted it for so long, but I seem to have been drawn in this season by a hidden tractor beam in Heather Mills' leg. In any case, some may see this as a sign that ruthlessness to her partners isn't limited to Paul McCartney (she forced Roberts to have the wax because he's hairy and she thought a bare chest would be more appropriate for a Latin Samba) but it was the most interesting part of the show.
You may have missed...
Heather Mills was Hoping for a Gay Partner [tr]
Posted 10:00 AM EST by Andy in Heather Mills, Jonathan Roberts, News, Television | Permalink
Comments
All that beautiful chest hair gone! What a travesty!
I have seriously got to start watcing that show.
Posted by: sam | Apr 17, 2007 10:04:27 AM
To not appreciate a beautiful hairy chest like that - she's even crazier than I thought...
Posted by: Edward | Apr 17, 2007 10:05:41 AM
A travesty, indeed. How my fingers could have enjoyed exploring that finery. Mm Mm Mm.
Posted by: Eddie | Apr 17, 2007 10:09:04 AM
You know, I was starting to like Heather. She seemed to have the strong, plucky thing going on.
Now I see her for the devil-spawn she is.
Posted by: Dan | Apr 17, 2007 10:13:37 AM
these are great pics, only she should have tied him down for it. :-0
Posted by: rich | Apr 17, 2007 10:18:52 AM
Waxing a beautiful chest like that is a sin! Heather clearly has no taste.
Posted by: Kenneth | Apr 17, 2007 10:20:50 AM
He had the perfect amount and pattern of chest hair. How could he allow her to do that to him? Sigh.
Posted by: ebsur | Apr 17, 2007 10:21:01 AM
Have you ever had a chest wax, Andy? "Interesting" is not the word I would describe it. More like "Can I please punch someone in the neck now?!" It is a very specific type of pain--I am tattooed and I find *chest-waxing* painful! :-)
Also, what they didn't show you with that guy is that 1-3 days afterwards your chest is totally covered in angry little red welts.
Posted by: stony_curtis | Apr 17, 2007 10:30:21 AM
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
The barbarians responsible for chest waxing should have their heads covered in honey and released to a group of starving bears.
(the two legged kind) lol
Posted by: Bobby | Apr 17, 2007 10:35:13 AM
ROFL!!! I love the "H" left behind! I am now very curious just how far down the treasure trail the waxing went!
Marvelous!
Posted by: Rad | Apr 17, 2007 10:36:56 AM
My god...this is tragic. Any step toward twinkdom is a step too far.
Posted by: scientitian | Apr 17, 2007 11:00:58 AM
OK, people... that does it!! I'm taking my new husband home now... and letting ALL that hair grow back, you hear !?! And you're not getting to play with him ever again... EVER !!! He's gonna play with guys who appreciate the PERFECT chest hair he has. (Thank god nobody's mentioned his PERFECT ass... you people would probably shave it too!! Weirdos!!! Perverts!!!)
Posted by: bojobear | Apr 17, 2007 11:04:20 AM
He did look rather good when he was completely waxed and tan dancing with his vest open, lol.
Posted by: Chris in Seattle | Apr 17, 2007 11:14:40 AM
he has a nice hairy chest.
Posted by: Travis | Apr 17, 2007 11:24:46 AM
Leave that sexy hairy chest alone! He didn't tell her to get a new leg did he???
Posted by: theo | Apr 17, 2007 11:33:22 AM
No Theo, that's the next thing of his she's gonna have cut off!
Posted by: hill_w | Apr 17, 2007 11:43:51 AM
looks so much better waxed! YUM!
Posted by: Raze | Apr 17, 2007 12:00:02 PM
I was screaming at her last night. Waxing his beautiful chest is a crime against hair.
Posted by: madamerouge | Apr 17, 2007 12:00:08 PM
She should be hanged for this crime. And Raze-just wait until you try to lick his nips. Your lips are going to be torn to shreds.
ABOLISH THE EPIL-LADIES!
Posted by: Gary | Apr 17, 2007 12:02:23 PM
That's one deranged bitch.
Posted by: Brian | Apr 17, 2007 12:03:00 PM
I'm sorry but there always seems to be a very misandristic element to these televised chest waxings.
It's always done by a woman and it is always done in a way that is degrading, demeaning and immasculating to the man (and men in general).
I find these cutesy little clips to be disgusting and terribly offensive. It's like America's obsession for seeing men hit, kicked, kneed or otherwise assaulted in the groin.
We wouldn't be entertained or amused if a woman was on the receiving end of these stunts. I can't imagine why anyone, especially gay men, should be amused or entertianed by seeing women demean, degrade and immasculate men.
And YES, I am a proud, unapologetic masculist.
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 12:08:10 PM
Zeke, I've seen plenty of women getting their legs waxed and they appear to be in just as much pain as the men
Posted by: Dave | Apr 17, 2007 12:14:38 PM
That bitch ruins every man.
Posted by: FernLaPlante | Apr 17, 2007 12:25:27 PM
Dave, women don't get their legs waxed by men on national television.
I'll assure you, if they did, there would be a national outcry about degrading and abusing women.
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 12:29:21 PM
Oh yawn.
Get over it, it will grow back. Probably thicker too.
And some of the comments exhibit misogyny anyway...and what's with Zeke's comment "I cant imagine why anyone, esp. gay men, should be amused or entertained by seeing women demean, degrade, emasculate men"-what, are women the sworn mortal enemies of gay men worldwide?
Strange.
Posted by: Charles | Apr 17, 2007 12:44:47 PM
she should have started with her chest first.
Posted by: sean | Apr 17, 2007 12:59:57 PM
eeww shes a gold digging cuntasourus BUT
Chest hair is gross. The only place a guy should have hair is his face and that should be taken care of and his head.
DOes anyone think the beckham nudes are real. I think he would be totally waxed take the pain like a woman no bitching beauty is pain.
Posted by: sasha | Apr 17, 2007 1:19:13 PM
Wow, Charles sees misogyny in my statements which were in no way anti-woman (I am as much a feminist as I am a masculist) but he sees nothing misandristic in that clip.
Strange indeed.
Charles, why don't you try a little reading comprehension. NOTHING in my comment in any way suggested that I think women are the sworn enemies of men.
Why are you turning this into a personal attack on me based completely in misinformation and fallacies?
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 1:20:03 PM
Wow, Charles sees misogyny in my statements which were in no way anti-woman (I am as much a feminist as I am a masculist) but he sees nothing misandristic in that clip.
Strange indeed.
Charles, why don't you try a little reading comprehension. NOTHING in my comment in any way suggested that I think women are the sworn enemies of men.
Why are you turning this into a personal attack on me based completely in misinformation and fallacies?
I don't say this often but you are being a real ass.
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 1:21:32 PM
They could have just used a razor--this was a stunt. I wish my chest hair were still black.
Posted by: anon | Apr 17, 2007 1:23:37 PM
Sorry for the double post. I swear I only hit "post" once.
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 1:24:36 PM
Removing the beauty of hair from a man's chest makes less sense than snipping his penis to please a deity. Sick.
Posted by: The Gay Species | Apr 17, 2007 1:43:23 PM
unthinkable. someone should slap heather...
Posted by: Ronald | Apr 17, 2007 1:45:35 PM
Zeke makes himself look foolish again.
No surprise there.
Posted by: RP | Apr 17, 2007 1:49:41 PM
The sweet part is that all his lovely chest hair will grow back. Her leg?
Not so much.
Posted by: digger | Apr 17, 2007 1:58:57 PM
The Gay species
^5
Chest hair is amazingly fun and beautiful, this from a twinkishly smooth chested male who prefers hairy chested men. hair on the ass is also fun, again i am smooth there. I wonder if my lack of body hair makes it more attractive to me, hmmmmmmm
Anyway; shoulder hair and back hair though is a-ok to shave off, laser, wax off any guy, But hands off the chest hair.
Posted by: pacificoceanboy | Apr 17, 2007 2:29:07 PM
The Gay species
^5
Chest hair is amazingly fun and beautiful, this from a twinkishly smooth chested male who prefers hairy chested men. hair on the ass is also fun, again i am smooth there. I wonder if my lack of body hair makes it more attractive to me, hmmmmmmm
Anyway; shoulder hair and back hair though is a-ok to shave off, laser, wax off any guy, But hands off the chest hair.
Posted by: pacificoceanboy | Apr 17, 2007 2:29:50 PM
Rp zeke is not making himself look foolish. Quite the contrary.
Anyway; I seem to have the double post bug as well. I swear I only hit the button once
Posted by: pacificoceanboy | Apr 17, 2007 2:31:57 PM
RP, I was wrong on the Bush post, I admit that. I OFTEN publicly admit when I'm wrong. But how did I make myself look foolish again? And why the personal hard on for me?
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 2:35:33 PM
And, by the way, I SERIOUSLY doubt that the majority of Towleroadies would agree with your assessment of me RP. I don't think I have given most people here the impression that I'm foolish or misogynistic.
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 2:39:31 PM
Don't sweat it Zeke. We luvs ya.
Posted by: digger | Apr 17, 2007 2:41:37 PM
I now support the death penalty...solely for Heather Mills and that horrible chest waxer...off with their heads!
Posted by: peterparker | Apr 17, 2007 3:03:40 PM
Maybe he used the clipped hair for his bad toupee!
Posted by: Deena | Apr 17, 2007 3:08:43 PM
Hey Zeke...don't feed the trolls by engaging them...just ignore 'em and they'll go away!
Posted by: peterparker | Apr 17, 2007 3:09:47 PM
Zeke, yesterday, you attacked me for being patronizing when you were stubbornly arguing with me.
Then on this thread you were patronizing to Charles.
I don't have a "hard on" for you. You just need to be more diligent in checking your facts and not be such a hypocrite in your posts.
Pacific, I was referring to Zeke contradicting himself with the patronizing comment he made towards Charles… not the double posts.
Posted by: RP | Apr 17, 2007 3:10:25 PM
RP, I believe if you go to the two threads dedicated to the Vtech shootings you will find that I admitted that I was wrong and apologized personally to you on BOTH of them.
How was I patronizing to Charles? He accused me of saying things that I didn't say, accused me of being a misogynist and told me to get over it. How was I supposed to respond to that?
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 3:39:18 PM
How dumb... waxing long hair is like, the worst and most painful thing you can do. I'd have wax off any long hair. Short hair is a different question, but long?
OUCH!
Posted by: C. | Apr 17, 2007 4:06:05 PM
RP and Zeke: you two used to get along so well... what happened? Please kiss and make up already.
Posted by: anon | Apr 17, 2007 4:35:37 PM
Anon, I have nothing against RP. I usually agree with his comments. I made a bit of an ass of myself yesterday going after him for rightfully challenging me on some mistatements I made. I apologized to him personally and publicly on the thread where the offense took place and on the updated thread dedicated to the same topic. I can only assume that he didn't see my apology prior to his last comment here.
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 5:22:45 PM
Oh, and by the way, I like Charles too. I'm a bit perplexed by his commentary on my statement. I would think more people here would know me better than that by now.
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 7:11:08 PM
This made me so sad. Each week I look foward to whatever peeks of chest hair Jonathan was showing and Heather went and runied that! Jonathan looked good smooth, but he's way hot hairy. *Sigh*
Posted by: Jeff | Apr 17, 2007 7:18:23 PM
that bitch is all kinds of to' up... what was she thinking?!
Posted by: sam | Apr 17, 2007 8:05:25 PM
Oh, lighten-up, for Pete's sake! This was obviously a stunt cooked-up by the writers, not Heather. And it gave us all a chance to see Jonathan with his shirt off, for which I, for one, am very grateful! He's gorgeous with chest hair, he's gorgeous smooth, and he'll be gorgeous at all the stages in between.
Posted by: Paul | Apr 17, 2007 10:08:36 PM
Why lighten up? Yes it was a stunt. Most of us think it was a stupid stunt. Why should we not say so?
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 17, 2007 10:36:19 PM
The problem is that teenage girls prefer guys who are smooth.
Posted by: Anon | Apr 17, 2007 11:50:53 PM
I don't think that's necessarily true Anon.
Besides if they want smooth chests they can become lesbians and leave more of those hot hairy boys for the girls and gay men that will appreciate 'em. ;)
Posted by: Zeke | Apr 18, 2007 9:59:18 AM
OH get over it ladies... it DOES grow back.
Posted by: MaxxInOz | Apr 19, 2007 10:03:46 AM
WAXING for guys is OVERRATED
Being hairless is OVERRATED
I love chest hair, I like smooth chests. They're all good. I think I like a hairy chest more than a smooth chest. Now back hair is a different story, that can go for every male. I also like a nice happy trail and I love hairy legs, they are soo sexy.
Posted by: Carlos Beltran | Apr 27, 2007 10:52:36 AM
Jonathan must be gathering those clippings for his new toupee.....LOL .......
Posted by: Pms | May 29, 2007 9:57:00 AM
Hairy or smooth chest, it's all good. As long as it doesn't have tits. :)
Posted by: Joseph | May 29, 2007 11:04:29 AM
Jonathan does NOT wear a toupee, you idiots!!! He's gorgeous with and without chest hair.
Posted by: Kimberly | Dec 10, 2007 5:40:13 PM
Recent Comments