Barack Obama | Election 2008 | News

Barack Obama Gives 'Race Speech' in Philadelphia

Barack Obama's much-anticipated speech on race is underway at the Constitution Center in Philadelphia, and the text has been released. In it, he addresses the controversy over comments by his pastor Reverend Jeremiah Wright and urges America to move on from the "racial stalemate" the country has been in for years.

ObamaSays Obama in the speech: "For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle – as we did in the OJ trial – or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies. We can do that. But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change."

WATCH the clip and read the full text of the speech, AFTER THE JUMP...

"A More Perfect Union"

Remarks of Senator Barack Obama

Constitution Center

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

As Prepared for Delivery

“We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.”

Two hundred and twenty one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America’s improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their declaration of independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.

The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.

Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitution – a Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.

And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part – through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk - to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.

This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign – to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together – unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction – towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.

This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story.

I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton’s Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I’ve gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world’s poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slaveowners – an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.

It’s a story that hasn’t made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts – that out of many, we are truly one.

Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in states with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.

This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either “too black” or “not black enough.” We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.

And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn.

On one end of the spectrum, we’ve heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it’s based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we’ve heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely – just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country – a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

As such, Reverend Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems – two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and You Tube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way

But the truth is, that isn’t all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God’s work here on Earth – by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.

In my first book, "Dreams From My Father," I described the experience of my first service at Trinity:

“People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend’s voice up into the rafters….And in that single note – hope! – I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion’s den, Ezekiel’s field of dry bones. Those stories – of survival, and freedom, and hope – became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn’t need to feel shame about…memories that all people might study and cherish – and with which we could start to rebuild.”

That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety – the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity’s services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.

And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions – the good and the bad – of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother – a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love.

Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.

But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America – to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality.

The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we’ve never really worked through – a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.

Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, “The past isn’t dead and buried. In fact, it isn’t even past.” We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.

Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven’t fixed them, fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today’s black and white students.

Legalized discrimination - where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African-American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments – meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today’s urban and rural communities.

A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one’s family, contributed to the erosion of black families – a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods – parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement – all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.

This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted. What’s remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.

But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American Dream, there were many who didn’t make it – those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations – those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings.

And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright’s sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.

In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don’t feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience – as far as they’re concerned, no one’s handed them anything, they’ve built it from scratch. They’ve worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor. They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they’re told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.

Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren’t always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.

Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze – a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns – this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.

This is where we are right now. It’s a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years. Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy – particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own.

But I have asserted a firm conviction – a conviction rooted in my faith in God and my faith in the American people – that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.

For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances – for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs - to the larger aspirations of all Americans -- the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off, the immigrant trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives – by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.

Ironically, this quintessentially American – and yes, conservative – notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright’s sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change.

The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country – a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old -- is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know -- what we have seen – is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope – the audacity to hope – for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.

In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination - and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past - are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds – by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations. It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.

In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand – that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.

For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle – as we did in the OJ trial – or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina - or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies.

We can do that.

But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.

That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, “Not this time.” This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children. This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can’t learn; that those kids who don’t look like us are somebody else’s problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.

This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don’t have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together.

This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn’t look like you might take your job; it’s that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.

This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should’ve been authorized and never should’ve been waged, and we want to talk about how we’ll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.

I would not be running for President if I didn’t believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. This union may never be perfect, but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation – the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election.

There is one story in particularly that I’d like to leave you with today – a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King’s birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.

There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there.

And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that’s when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.

She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat.

She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the roundtable that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents too.

Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother’s problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegally. But she didn’t. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice.

Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they’re supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who’s been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he’s there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of Barack Obama. He simply says to everyone in the room, “I am here because of Ashley.”

“I’m here because of Ashley.” By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children.

But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two hundred and twenty one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. Obama was not in Wright's church on July 22nd. He was in Florida on the day in question. There is video of it. Wait a second, what's going on here. I thought he didn't campaign in Florida?

    Posted by: z | Mar 19, 2008 7:13:30 AM


  2. LIZ

    Zeke is one of the nicest posters if not the nicest poster at Towleroad.

    Your acusation about him bashing is way off.

    --------------------------------------

    Z

    The sermon in question "God Damn America" etc...was pre- election. What sermon are you talking about?

    Years ago.

    Come on people

    Support Hillary. Critic the rev's words. BUT please stop making up crap about Obama being there and bobing his head in agreement, and please stop making up stuff about people who post at Towleroad that you happen to disagree with.

    Come on now

    Posted by: Jimmyboyo | Mar 19, 2008 8:54:07 AM


  3. Patrick

    I admit whole hearedly that my posts are full of typos. I appologize regularly for that.

    I did not call you out by name kid.

    But you did me.

    SO

    HYPOCRITE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    You might not hear crap from the pulpits at catholic churchs when you attend family funerals, marriages, and baptisms................BUT you are supporing the pope's words on gays

    The pope. The vicar of christ. God's physical rep on earth. The ruler of the kingdom of christ till jesus' return.

    NON celibate gays comit a MORTAL SIN = instant hell fire and damnation if unrepented and unconfessed to a priest.

    YOU hypocrite!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Hold yourself to the same standad as obama. You can't attend funerals, marriages, and family baptisms by the standards you are holding obama.

    Get over it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    A retarded 2 year old I might very well be, but at least I am not suporting some sky fairy worshiping dress wearer that damns all sexualy active gays to hell.

    Also, looking back at your posts......you have been a Hillary supporter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!NOT an obama supporter

    On top of it all, you are a liar.

    Your past posts all support Hillary.

    LOL

    Now you boo hootht you have lost faith in Obama

    BS

    Your pat posts all support hillary!

    Liar.

    Like I said, a retarded 2 yr old I might very well be. A crazy nut job for sure. A horrible typist beyond compare

    You sir are a liar and a hypocrite

    Have a wonderful day.

    Posted by: Jimmyboyo | Mar 19, 2008 9:23:49 AM


  4. Wow, Noah, talk about keeping it real, you have spoke the truth on so many levels, and, a hearty thank you! Too bad these angry posters won't get it!

    Posted by: Sebastian | Mar 19, 2008 10:56:38 AM


  5. I have consistently made clear to those willing to listen that LGBT rights are not only not my only concern, they are not my MAIN concern in this election. Rather it is the long arc of Supreme Court appointments and the immediate horror of Iraq. I wrote earlier that I HOPED Obama would succeed in this speech because Wright’s pulpit pathology had unnecessarily torn open a wound still trying to heal and could contribute to McCain being elected.

    But Obama chose to employ over 900 words at minimum to a litany of issues beyond race—as many as a typical newspaper editorial-and yet chose to leave us out of his teaching moment when the whole world was watching.

    How inconsistent and indefensible is that in one who asks for all our votes to be all our President? I respectfully submit the words of someone who, like gay black activist Mel Boozer ...unlike me and most here .. had been called BOTH a "nigger" and a "faggot." Someone that Rev. Wright should pay more attention to than his bosom buddy Louis Farrakhan—and Barack Obama more than to Rev. Wright.

    QUOTE: “[B]ecause we stand in the center of progress toward democracy, [gays] have a terrifying responsibility to the whole society.... First, the gay community cannot work for justice for itself alone. Unless the community fights for all, it is fighting for nobody, least of all for itself. Second, gay people should not practice prejudice. It is inconsistent for gay people to be antisemitic or racist. These gay people do not understand human rights. ...

    [Gay] people should recognize that we cannot fight for the rights of gays unless we are ready to fight for a new mood in the United States, unless we are ready to fight for a radicalization of this society. ...[For example] feed[ing] people...adequate Social Security...These economic concerns must go hand-in-hand and, to a degree, precede the possibility of dealing with the MOST grievous problem—which is sexual prejudice.”

    Today, blacks are no longer the litmus paper or the barometer of social change. Blacks are in every segment of society and there are laws that help to protect them from racial discrimination. THE NEW ‘NIGGERS’ ARE GAYS. No person who hopes to get politically elected, even in the deep South...would dare stand in the school door to keep blacks out. Nobody would dare openly and publicly argue that blacks should not have the right to public accommodations. Nobody would dare to say any number of things about blacks that they are perfectly prepared to say about gay people. It is in that sense that gay people are the new barometer for social CHANGE.

    Indeed, if you want to know whether today people believe in democracy if you want to know whether they are true democrats, if you want to know whether they are human rights activists, the question to ask is, ‘What about gay people?’ Because that is now the litmus paper by which this democracy is to be judged. The barometer for social CHANGE is measured by selecting the group that is most mistreated. To determine where society is with respect to CHANGE, one does not ask, ‘What do you think about the education of children’? Nor does one ask, ‘Do you believe the aged should have Social Security/” The question of social CHANGE should be framed with the most vulnerable group in mind: gay people.”

    - Bayard Rustin, from an address to the chapter of Black & White Men Together in the same city and in the same month in which Barack Obama delivered his speech....except Rustin’s was twenty-two years ago...right about the time Barack Obama met Jeremiah Wright.

    Emphasis mine, and I’m confidant today Rustin would have said LGBT rather than just "gay" and asked Obama WHERE we were.

    Posted by: Michael Bedwell | Mar 19, 2008 11:26:40 AM


  6. I think people need to remember that Obama has known about this hate speech for a long time. How do I know this? Because even I have known about Wright's sermons since summer of 2007. In Obama's speech a few weeks ago, he talked about "words" and how they matter.

    These quotes from Wright are not isolated sermons that are being taken out of context, Obama's church has been selling these sermons on DVD/CD for a long time. Almost (in my opinion) peddling this hate rhetoric.

    I went to a church with my family a few years ago, and I was given one of the churches CD's. On the CD I heard the Pastor talk about homosexuals and hell and how we are sinners, etc,etc. I made the decision at that moment that I would not go to that church with my family ever again no matter how much I love them because I don't beleive or accept the message that church was giving and I will not support any kind of hate.

    So my question is, If Obama says words matter, then why would he not leave that church on that basis? Does he beleive that way of thinking? Did he get political gain from going to that church? I think these are valuable questions.

    And one other point, if Obama has made cornerstone his excellent judgement as the reason in which he is qualified to be President, what kind of judgement does he have in closely alligning himself with this hate-filled Pastor. Not only a Pastor that speaks this way, but a Pastor who has gone on trips and given awards to Louis Farrakhan, a man who has spoken so much about the hate for the white community, the gay community, the jewish community. Research it people.

    We in the gay community have made issue (correctly I beleive)of the Pat Robertson/Jerry Falwell indorcements and those poloticians who they support vocally and quietly. But this is even more dangerous in my opinion, Rev. Wright didn't just go out and indorse Obama, Obama indorsed Wright by going to that church for 20 years and having Wright on one of his Presidential commitees.

    We as democrats need to look long and hard at the facts and have integrity in how we are examining these canidates.

    Posted by: Daniel | Mar 19, 2008 12:57:04 PM


  7. To Derrick From Philly:

    I was looking forward to posting a rather lengthy response to some of the comment here, but it seems you have summed up my feelings rather well. Why reiterate what's already been said, and rather eloquently, I might add.

    I, myself found so much truth in Obama's speech, and suffices to say, my truth is different to someone else's truth. I think that is one major point I took away from his speech. It stuck me very hard, indeed. For that is what I see going on as far as some of the comments here.

    That said, I hope that we can all move past this and reach a common understanding, for if only to ensure that the right party party is occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue same time, next year.

    Posted by: banjiboi | Mar 19, 2008 1:10:05 PM


  8. The typos, my god, the typos!!!!

    Posted by: banjiboi | Mar 19, 2008 1:11:44 PM


  9. M.BEDWELL -

    Thank you for finding that speech and sharing it here. It's helped calm me down a bit this morning, and also have a little self reflection on the issues at hand.

    DANIEL -

    Good post. Thank you.

    Posted by: Silverskreen | Mar 19, 2008 1:48:04 PM


  10. believe...not beleive
    sorry for my typos banjiboi!!

    Posted by: daniel | Mar 19, 2008 1:52:20 PM


  11. Still waiting for the single example of Obama ever saying anything racist or Anti-American. I'm still waiting for the evidence that it was Wright's occassional racist outbursts and not the thousands of hours of social justice guidance that most influenced his moral, ethical, spiritual and political beliefs. I still maintain that this should be the issue here.

    I'm also waiting for LIZ to back up her spurious accusations against me.

    [sounds of crickets chirping]

    Posted by: Zeke | Mar 19, 2008 2:48:48 PM


  12. Congrats to Noah on a finely crafted post. Unfortunately, it has fallen on deaf ears. Obama's speech is about imperfection. America is beautiful but not perfect, with every new generation our prevailing attitudes about certain subjects (i.e. racism, homophobia, etc.) changes for the better. I don't understand how anyone can misconstrue this as pandering. He choose to give a very nuanced and adult speech about race in this country. Unfortunately, nuance doesn't play well. Most people like to frame things in black and white terms because they're too lazy to examine all the grays.

    Some posters are willing to give Bush and Cheney a pass, but not Obama? Really? Seriously? You need to ask yourself who has and could do more harm to the queer community? If you're honest with yourself you'd know it wasn't Obama.

    But I've accepted the fact is that it's no win situation for those people. Nothing Obama says or does will be good enough for them. And that's just sad. The Democratic Party has two very qualified candidates and we should be thrilled, but instead we have people acting like children. Threatening to defect to the other side in retaliation? It's asinine. Wanting Obama to renounce his candidacy for a hiccup that doesn't even directly involve him is like asking Hillary to step down for Ferraro's comments, stupidity. I expect these candidates to duke it out until the end because it's so close it would be a disservice to their constituents if they just gave up. However, I fully expect democrats to unite once our candidate is selected, because, ultimately this country can't not withstand another Republican presidency.

    I also want to address how posters continue to make mountains out of molehills, especially in reference to the African American community, and they should be ashamed of themselves. Whether some posters want to admit it or not there is a double standard on this site when the subject of homophobia in the African American community is concerned. And for some reason, African Americans rarely get the pass their white counterparts do. I think those posters need to examine why they're prone to do that.

    Posted by: sugarrhill | Mar 19, 2008 4:35:57 PM


  13. Zeke:
    How about what Michelle OBAMA said:

    “Hope is making a comeback and, let me tell you, for the first time in my adult life, I am proud of my country. Not just because Barack is doing well, but I think people are hungry for change,”

    Zeke, in your adult lifetime, have you ever been proud of America before this year?

    I'd say that statement by Barrack's wife is pretty anti-american.

    I can tell you I have hope you'll become straight soon, but you're a faggot now. Is that statement anti-gay, I think so. Same with the anti-american statement.

    Everything wrapped in "hope" sounds better though.

    Posted by: douggyfresh | Mar 19, 2008 4:37:49 PM


  14. douggyfresh

    I assume you are male andprbably Non-brown

    Just try to imagine being an african amerian girl being born just 4 months after the 16th street baptist church bombing that killed 4 little black girls for just being black.

    Now try to imagine as that girl growing up on the southside of Chicago. It wasn't park avenue. Think ghetto where she had to share her bedroom with her brother.

    You might find yourself a little less then happy with america.

    Now add to that going to princeton and being dismissed because you are both a female and black though yo end up doing better than ALL your classmates and graduate with top honors.

    You go on to Harvad Law and though you graduated from princeton cumma sum laude yet that means nothing because you are both woman and black.

    You raduate and constantly hit your head on the glass ceiling that ALL women of whatever color experience.

    That is Michelle Obama's actual life

    If you can't understand how such a person could possibly not find a ton of things to be happy with ameica about then you sir need to get out of your non- brown people country club and stop sippng that tea and eating your crumpets

    Posted by: Jimmyboyo | Mar 19, 2008 5:03:52 PM


  15. sorry for the typos and spelling f ups

    Posted by: jimmyboyo | Mar 19, 2008 5:06:25 PM


  16. Jimmyboyo:

    You have assumed correctly that I am non-brown.

    But I can tell you that since 1991, I have volunteered more than 30 days a year, every year, giving time, money and energy to provide medical treatment to orphan children with HIV/AIDS in the country of Haiti.

    I can also tell you that I grew in a small town in Ohio where in 1984 I experienced a boy 7 years older than me beat to death because he was gay (long before the media was reporting these stories) This experience also gave me reason to fear people's prejudice and for my own safety.

    But I have seen hardships in other countries, and everytime I have come back from Haiti, I am in awe of this country and how wonderful it is, even with it's problems.

    To give me the example of Michelle getting to go to an Ivy League University, with many acceptance issues along the way, is in my opinion not a valid answer to why someone might be anti-american.

    I would challenge you to volunteer outside of this country and see that even at our worst, there is much to be proud of in the US.

    I am not saying that all is well, I am saying that if we want to elect a President to be our representative to the world, I would like for the President's wife to be proud of her country more than just now in the time in which her husband is running for the office of President.

    Posted by: douggyfresh | Mar 19, 2008 5:23:41 PM


  17. JIMMYBOY

    Where to begin. First as I wrote in my post 'I wish people would read and perhaps re-read posts before they reply. I said in my 48 years I had never heard IN MY CATHOLIC CHURCH. Yes the catholic church itself is homophobic and I'm sure many are just as racist, but not preached from the pulpit as Obama implies.'

    I not only said in my experience, I was replying to what Obama said about he was sure it happened in other churches. As you can see I also mention that the church is homophobic and racist, not to mention anti-semitic. While I do go to the church when my family has an event, I do not receive communion and have not gone to services otherwise since I left the church as a practicing member when I was sixteen. Which Obama should have done when he heard that hate speech. I openly call the church when the pope or anyone bashes gays, or anyone for that matter.

    You call me a hypocrite because I called you on saying get over it, yet earlier you say you are sorry to Silverskreen,
    ----------------------
    'I appologize for coming off so dismissive.
    I have tried in the past to push for an Obama/ Hillary ticket
    I'm pissed and probably went overboard.
    I appologize
    We are all supposed to be united against the repubs.'
    ---------------------
    Yet when I respond to your remark, while not directed to me by name, to people who are upset at Obama, which I happen to be, you call me on it. You are wrong about me never supporting Obama, I did openly since he announced and as I even write in my post you trashed, plan on voting for him if he gets the nomination, something that he just put in great risk. I started to question his judgement over the SC fundraiser in October. As you can see from this other post others know this to be true.
    ------------------
    PATRICK NYC -

    Yikes!! Was it this whole thing with Wright that changed your mind?
    I remember your support for him.


    I find this whole thing very interesting, needless to say.

    POSTED BY: SILVERSKREEN | MAR 18, 2008 6:22:31 PM
    ----------------
    Go back and look up my posts and you'll know it is true and while I will not call you a liar, I will say you have major anger issues. People like you should not use Andy's blog as a way to blow off your hate at those who disagree with your point of view.

    At least I now understand your screen name, you act like a little boy. Unless you are posting about your not so secret crush Obama, then you sound like a little girl.

    Posted by: Patrick nyc | Mar 19, 2008 6:30:12 PM


  18. "I am not saying that all is well, I am saying that if we want to elect a President to be our representative to the world, I would like for the President's wife to be proud of her country more than just now in the time in which her husband is running for the office of President."

    This country isn't perfect nor has it ever been perfect. The Obamas are very truthful about that fact. You don't change the status quo thinking that everything is perfect. Change happens when problems are addressed and not sugarcoated. If that is the only reason you are unhappy with his candidacy then you are not being honest with yourself.

    Posted by: sugarrhill | Mar 19, 2008 8:32:01 PM


  19. PATRICK NYC, with all due respect my friend, I think you misunderstood SILVERSKREEN's comment. He was being serious, not sarcastic. He said that he remembered that you were supportive of Obama. He found it interesting how all of this was playing out. That's all.

    Posted by: Zeke | Mar 19, 2008 8:38:22 PM


  20. SOMEone has not read or heard this speech.

    Posted by: Boogiedown | Mar 19, 2008 8:38:44 PM


  21. Patrick

    You can not in any way compare yourself to Silverskreen. He has class

    You did not call me out on my dismissivness and ask for an apology, you atacked.

    If you hadn't done the whole 2nd grade bs then most likely I would have apologized if you had simply said you felt offended. In fact I would have gladly appologized. NIC, Silverskreen, and many others have called me out before on not being cordial or whatever and I appologize and try to become a better person.

    But tired old queens like youself like to get caty instead of saying simply they were offended.

    I am not sorry at all for being dismissive of you. You attacked. You do not have the moral high ground.

    Again, I call you a liar. Your past posts here at towleroad have all been pro Hillary. You have admited voting for hillary.

    You never had faith in obama and somehow now feel betrayed.

    Stop your lieing.

    Ughhhh

    You come off as such an OLD tired queen.


    Dougyfresh

    I personaly never said I do not have anything to proud of about america. I to have traveled abroad and done voluntere work in Egypt. I am very grateful to be living in america. I am white and my family was well off.

    BUT, I can empathize with Michele's point of view.

    I am going to quess that you yourself just like many Hillary supporters in the past have said things like america sucks, fuck america, etc. Most democratic voters do at one point in their life because our country does have a lot of faults.

    BUT it now benefits hillary suppoters to blow Michele's and other associates of Obama words out of proportion as if they were traitors to america. Very repub of you to question the patriotism of others.

    Posted by: Jimmyboyo | Mar 19, 2008 8:45:23 PM


  22. Hey fellas,

    Been busy at the old salt mine today and didn't really get a chance to check in until now.

    What'd I miss?...

    Oh...

    Posted by: Silverskreen | Mar 19, 2008 9:03:14 PM


  23. The first of the following poll results are surely to change again, one way or the other. I post it to note its significant changes over previous polls NOT to assert this is where we'll be even next week. The second might also change but I find it fascinating.

    “New Gallup Poll Daily tracking finds Hillary Clinton with a 49% to 42% lead over Barack Obama in national Democratic voters' presidential nomination preference. ...

    [John McCain] holds a statistically significant lead over Obama, 47% to 43%, in registered voters' preferences for the general presidential election. That is the first time any of the candidates has held a statistically significant lead since Gallup Poll Daily tracking began reporting on the general election race last week. McCain's 48% to 45% advantage over Clinton is not statistically significant, but it is the first time he has had an edge over her in Gallup Poll Daily tracking.”

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/105205/Gallup-Daily-Clinton-Moves-Into-Lead-Over-Obama.aspx

    “CBS Poll: Gender Matters More Than Race -
    Voters Say Woman Candidate Faces Slightly Bigger Barriers To Presidency Than A Black Candidate

    Voters are slightly more likely to say that a woman candidate faces more obstacles than a black candidate when it comes to presidential politics even as they see racism as a more serious problem for the nation overall, according to a new CBS News poll. Thirty nine percent of registered voters said a woman running for president faces more obstacles while 33 percent said a black candidate does.

    When it comes to the 2008 presidential election, voters say Hillary Clinton has been judged more harshly because of her gender than Barack Obama has because of his race. Forty two percent said Clinton has been judged 'more harshly' and six percent said she has been judged less harshly because of her gender. Twenty seven percent said they think Obama has been judged 'more harshly' because of his race while 11 percent said he has been judged less harshly.”

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/03/19/opinion/polls/main3949396.shtml


    Posted by: Michael Bedwell | Mar 19, 2008 10:13:42 PM


  24. PATRICK NYC, with all due respect my friend, I think you misunderstood SILVERSKREEN's comment. He was being serious, not sarcastic. He said that he remembered that you were supportive of Obama. He found it interesting how all of this was playing out. That's all.

    POSTED BY: ZEKE | MAR 19, 2008 8:38:22 PM
    ---------------
    ZEKE sir, I did not misunderstand SILVERSKREEN, I said he supported me and backed up my initial support of Obama, which that clueless child JIMMYGIRL seems to ignore. That's why I cut and pasted his post to me. Thanks though. Sorry you guys have to weed through my smack down with this twerp Jimmyboy.
    Again what he posted was:

    ------------------
    PATRICK NYC -

    Yikes!! Was it this whole thing with Wright that changed your mind?
    I remember your support for him.


    I find this whole thing very interesting, needless to say.

    POSTED BY: SILVERSKREEN | MAR
    -----------
    He remembers I supported Obama, which if anyone like you who knows me know is true. And again I will vote for him if he gets the nomination.

    This ruthless attack by JimmyBoy is without base.

    He says: "You did not call me out on my dismissivness and ask for an apology, you atacked."

    I did not ask for an apology because I don't want one from an idiot like you. I have long ago dismissed anything you say, knowing you are a clueless twit. I did not attack you sir, that's right, and check the spelling again you mental midget. There ought to be a way to bump idiots like you who can't even use spell check to edit their idiotic statements.

    What I did was address your tirade at me, over my disagreeing with you over whether we people who are upset over the whole Rev. Wright situation should as you put it 'get over it'. You do not get to tell me or anyone here to get over anything sir, or I should say child.

    As for this gem of yours, "In fact I would have gladly appologized. NIC, Silverskreen, and many others have called me out before on not being cordial or whatever and I appologize and try to become a better person."

    The fact that many have called you out on your rants and "not being cordial" just shows how many holes are in your defense. You little boy are a fake and fraud. I will not use your term of liar, I will just continue to say you are both clueless and an idiot.

    Two final things. As for me "Stop your lieing." Again get a freaking dictionary you douche, it's lying.

    Second, I may be tired, it's 11:30 here in good old NYC, but I'm not a queen. I am a proud Irish-American Gay White Male. Who for over 35 years has done volunteer work to help all those in my community. Gay, started with the GMHC in 1983, straight, worked on my Uncles Campaign at age 13, and was a big brother to three boys in Harlem. Worked on the NGTLF crisis line for three years. Worked for the NYC RRC, working on the marathon, and any other races I did not compete in. Coached with the Gay Front Runners of NY for many years, president for two.

    I will stand up to you any day you idiot. You are not fit to shine my shoes or wipe my ass.

    Posted by: patrick nyc | Mar 19, 2008 11:44:58 PM


  25. MICHAEL BEDWELL, God knows I love you to peices, but come on.

    I'm curious as to why you've JUST NOW discovered polls. Why haven't you posted any of these polls over the last month or so?

    I also notice you that you didn't post the Rasmussen poll or the others that show a significant upswing for Obama over the last two days.

    Polls or no polls, I'm still waiting for someone, ANYONE, to show me the math where Hillary can win the nomination without the Super Delegates voting contrary to the popular vote and the primary/caucus delegates.

    Another current poll out (that wasn't mentioned) shows an overwhelming percentage of Democrats believe that Super Delegates SHOULD NOT go against the popular vote and seated delegates. Strangely enough, according to the same poll, the percentage of Hillary supporters who feel this way is 26%. I wonder why that would be? It doesn't sound like a very DEMOCRATIC way for the DEMOCRATIC PARTY to select a nominee and it really does play into the "win at all cost" accusations.

    What's your take on that?

    Jesus, insomnia and internet access are a DANGEROUS combination!

    :)

    Posted by: Zeke | Mar 20, 2008 1:30:18 AM


  26. « | 1 2 3 4 5 6 »

Post a comment







Trending


« «First Look: Tropic Thunder Trailer« «