Joe Oppedisano | New Orleans | News | Nightlife | Photography

BigGayDeal.com

Joe Oppedisano: Dangerous Boys

Joe

Photographer Joe Oppedisano gave us an exclusive sneak peek at a series of images entitled "Dangerous Boys" he shot for the upcoming Black Party issue of New York's Next magazine, which comes out at the end of this week. The annual Black Party happens this year on March 29.

You may remember Joe's homage to the Calvin Klein underwear man we featured back in January.

Check out the Black Party images here (warning NSFW).

Previously
It's Calvin Klein Underwear Group Photo Time! [tr]
EXCLUSIVE: Joe Oppedisano Celebrates the Calvin Klein Man [tr]

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. I guess "to each his own", but I think those images are oddly unsexy and kind of corny.

    Posted by: Joe | Mar 11, 2008 5:45:48 PM


  2. Kink is fun

    leather is just another form of drag

    most kink guys never wear leather

    Posted by: Jimmyboyo | Mar 11, 2008 6:02:04 PM


  3. They don't look "dangerous" - they look like they've got disposable income to spend on leathers. They look like its fantasy time - which I guess it is!
    Yes "to each his own".

    Posted by: dave | Mar 11, 2008 6:05:07 PM


  4. They don't look "dangerous" - they look like they've got disposable income to spend on leathers. They look like its fantasy time - which I guess it is!
    Yes "to each his own".

    Posted by: dave | Mar 11, 2008 6:06:20 PM


  5. The photographs are pretty but not even remotely sexy. More like second rate Mapplethorpe or something.

    Sexy doesn't really pose, does it?

    Posted by: YankinTex | Mar 11, 2008 6:21:19 PM


  6. indeed the pics are very much like The Black Party... pasteurized and derivative... fabricated and skeevy.
    No edge at all.

    Posted by: A.J. | Mar 11, 2008 6:32:02 PM


  7. These pictures are exactly why I wouldn't go to the Black Party. Unattractive, unsexy, skeezy and cheesy.

    But if that's your thing, more power to ya.

    Posted by: Naha | Mar 11, 2008 7:24:46 PM


  8. Sorry, but...just iconic rubbish to me!

    Posted by: Mikem | Mar 11, 2008 7:49:22 PM


  9. The leather's not really my thing, but does anyone know the name of the guy in the main picture up there, or if he's done any other modeling work? He's really, REALLY good-looking (and that's WITH a silly hat on!)

    Posted by: Chris | Mar 11, 2008 9:13:28 PM


  10. Scruffy face but no chest hair... (sigh) Dangerous.. to whom? :)

    Posted by: Bearotic.com | Mar 11, 2008 9:24:49 PM


  11. Gross.

    Posted by: z | Mar 11, 2008 10:54:52 PM


  12. I think most of the images are nicely photographed and post processed, but I have to agree there isn't the slightest bit of danger in a single image. It's more like a disneyization of gay danger. Maybe the soft processing, which is lovely, contributes to this.

    Posted by: Patrick | Mar 11, 2008 11:04:41 PM


  13. What can it mean that I am much more attracted to that gorgeous fireplace mantle than to any of those men?

    Posted by: Father Tony | Mar 11, 2008 11:35:13 PM


  14. Drag queens are much hotter and "dangerous" in heels than leather.

    Posted by: z | Mar 12, 2008 12:18:58 AM


  15. cheap, horrible, WTF!!!!!!!!!

    Posted by: dangerous | Mar 12, 2008 12:30:49 AM


  16. It was interesting that he chose to include a guy who looks ill.

    Posted by: thin mint | Mar 12, 2008 2:39:06 AM


  17. ^5 Father T! Keep the Pleather Girls and send over the Della Robbia mantle.

    Posted by: rudy | Mar 12, 2008 7:24:42 AM


  18. These are terrible. There's no sex in the poses and the processing is amateurish. They might as well be selling Tom Ford leather perfume in Vanity Fair's fashion issue.

    Posted by: greg | Mar 12, 2008 8:52:34 AM


  19. Makes me more excited for IML!

    Posted by: Allen | Mar 12, 2008 9:37:14 AM


  20. Not bad. A bit contrived, but still nice. And Jack, some gay men like both -- a lot. :)

    Posted by: Jeff | Mar 12, 2008 9:47:37 AM


  21. Why do all his photos (not these photos but his photos in general) look the same, that is my question.

    Posted by: junior | Mar 12, 2008 11:54:32 AM


  22. i love the jackbooted daddy with the stogie -- i certainly wouldn't mind thrusting myself between his knees and drinking from the tap, if you catch my drift...

    Posted by: the queen | Mar 12, 2008 1:31:44 PM


  23. It's always a bit odd when people say that leather is just another form of drag. Drag is definitely theatrical and is associated with performing (probably from the middle ages when only men could be actors), and often is done for pay. Nothing remotely like that happens with the (now residual) leather community. Most guys in leather are just dumpy 50-year-olds--which is why it gets lumped together with the bear community (entirely different). The Black Party is a rave for 30-year olds.

    Posted by: anon | Mar 12, 2008 2:28:40 PM


  24. BARF!!!!

    Posted by: carlos | Mar 13, 2008 10:47:59 PM


  25. LOOKS LIKE A 1040s LADY STRIPPER TO ME !
    S_C_A_R_Y

    Posted by: BOB | Mar 15, 2008 5:21:06 PM


  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment







Trending


« «Music News: Madonna Inducted Into The Rock & Roll Hall Of Fame, Plus Duffy, David Archuleta, Ferras « «