'DADT' Repeal Stalls as Senate Motion to Invoke Cloture Fails
Efforts to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" faltered today as the Senate voted 56-43, refusing to approve a motion to invoke cloture and move to consideration of the National Defense Authorization Act, containing both the DREAM Act and the DADT repeal amendments.
60 votes were needed to proceed.
Very disappointing.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid voted "no" on the motion to invoke cloture, reportedly a procedural move so he can bring the bill back to the floor at some point for another vote. If Reid had voted "yes", that would not be possible.
Said Alexander Nicholson, founder and Executive Director of Servicemembers United:
"Today's vote is a failure of leadership on the part of those who have been duly elected to serve this nation and to put the best interests of the country ahead of partisan politics. The Senate could learn a good lesson from those who serve in uniform and who stand to benefit from proceeding to debate on this bill - serving this country means putting politics aside and getting the job done. It is simply inexcusable that this vote failed today."
Said Army veteran and SLDN Executive Director Aubrey Sarvis:
"Today’s Senate vote was a frustrating blow to repeal this horrible law. We lost because of the political maneuvering dictated by the mid-term elections. Let’s be clear: Opponents to repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ did not have the votes to strike those provisions from the bill. Instead, they had the votes for delay. Time is the enemy here. We now have no choice but to look to the lame duck session where we’ll have a slim shot. The Senate absolutely must schedule a vote in December when cooler heads and common sense are more likely to prevail once midterm elections are behind us. Servicemembers Legal Defense Network will continue to take this fight to the American people, the vast majority of whom support repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’”
ROLL CALL, AFTER THE JUMP...
YES - 56
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Begich (D-AK)
Bennet (D-CO)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Burris (D-IL)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Goodwin (D-WV)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaufman (D-DE)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Reed (D-RI)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Specter (D-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)
NO - 43
Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bennett (R-UT)
Bond (R-MO)
Brown (R-MA)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
LeMieux (R-FL)
** Lincoln (D-AR) **
Lugar (R-IN)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
** Pryor (D-AR) **
** Reid (D-NV) [procedural vote so he can bring the measure back up] **
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Snowe (R-ME)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Wicker (R-MS)
Not Voting - 1
Murkowski (R-AK)




You don't think the Dem leadership, including Obama didn't know this would happen? Fools, all of you. On Thursday, Obama's DOJ must decide if they will appeal the ruling of Judge Phillips that DADT is unconsitutional, something that made all of this farce of political theater pointless (yet effective in confusing most of you dumbasses). When he does appeal (which Obama is not compelled to do, except by his own hate and bigotry) are you going to blame that on Susan Collins too? Idiots.
Posted by: gaylib | Sep 21, 2010 3:41:25 PM
This first and foremost a failure of Democratic leadership. This won't fire anyone up to vote against Republicans. We currently have the biggest Dem majority in a generation, the number will never be better than they are now. It shows how meaningless our votes were in 2008.
Posted by: ken | Sep 21, 2010 3:47:08 PM
"bigger picture, there shouldn't even be votes on civil rights issues, period. this is a civil rights issue which makes it a constitutional issue, not a military issue, not a legislative issue." POSTED BY: MLD | SEP 21, 2010 3:17:40 PM
Posted by: Katie | Sep 21, 2010 3:47:08 PM
@Scott "The voters of ... and Massachusetts hoisted this upon us"
Don't blame me, I voted for Martha Coakley (even if not perfect, she's no Scott Brown)
Posted by: ravewulf | Sep 21, 2010 3:49:36 PM
Two years Obama spent wanking with "bipartisanship" and giving concessions to the Republicans ( who wanted his Waterloo) and the nut job blue-dogs, instead of putting up the reforms he was elected to implement, two years wasted, without a public option, without a single payer.....and leaving the insurance companies with as much power as ever....and Big Pharma with more power.....
and this is the "Change we can believe in" ?
As Bush said : "Fool me once shame on you/Fool me twice eh, um, ahh.........."
Posted by: JackFknTwist | Sep 21, 2010 3:51:42 PM
I hope it will inspire people to keep out of the military and keep out of conventional politics. The breeders have never given us a damned thing and never will.
Posted by: David Ehrenstein | Sep 21, 2010 3:53:35 PM
Disgusting. Reid, 2 Arkansas Dems, the Maine Repubs and Scott Brown all voted against cloture, enabling the crazies who want to drag us back to godknowswhere.
And in reality, stone age people were more live and let live than today's religious right-wingers, who for all intents and purposes are stuck in the middle ages. Grow up and get educated, Christ-psychotics, this is the 21st Century not the 12th.
Posted by: Ed-M | Sep 21, 2010 3:54:15 PM
This DADT issue is beyond my understanding. How can US be so different from Europe? I couldn't imagine parliament of my home country to debate issues like DADT.
I don't want upset US readers on this site, but you have elections coming. The Capitol Hill needs a big change and voters are able to do it. (And I know there are terrible Tea Party etc. tp figth against.) I am sure you will use your vote carefully.
Posted by: Matt26 | Sep 21, 2010 3:54:34 PM
As always when dealing with the United States Senate, each and every entitled Senator asks him or her self "What's in it for Me? Not enough this time evidently. The American Taliban is still hard at work pulling the leavers that dispense the dough the to most corrupt political body in any government since Louis the XIV.
Posted by: ggreen | Sep 21, 2010 3:56:47 PM
@ken Our votes werem't meaningless. I've said it before and I'll say it again: the Democrats may be pathetic and weak, but at least they aren't insane like the conservatives are. We didn't get what we wanted, but we could have gotten far worse. (Yes, it sucks choosing between bad and worse, but it does make a difference)
Posted by: ravewulf | Sep 21, 2010 3:57:40 PM
I actually think GAYLIB will be disappointed when DADT is repealed and other gay rights measures come to light because then he wont have anywhere to direct his hatred and anger at.
Obama is a bigot!...um, ok. If you believe that then I have a bridge to sell you in Houston.
Calling people dumb asses and idiots never got anything accomplished.
Keep calm and carry on!
Posted by: Brian in Texas | Sep 21, 2010 3:59:49 PM
Neither party is doing anything for my civil rights, so yeah, I'll consider voting Republican, I could really use the tax cut.
Posted by: ken | Sep 21, 2010 4:00:33 PM
I voted for Obama; hope he's got a position lined up for January 21, 2013. I have been let down for the last time. If he hates gay folks this much, he doesn't deserve our support.
Posted by: mad1026 | Sep 21, 2010 4:00:55 PM
What's that Brian? I can't hear you with Obama AND Reid's dicks in your mouth.
Posted by: gaylib | Sep 21, 2010 4:04:50 PM
@GGreen: I agree ....it's all about lobbyists and corporate donations, especially to the institutions/trusts/pressure groups set up and promoted by the Senators.......
The US Senate has no concept of personal integrity........only self aggrandisement and self importance.
The idea of these assholes voting to "allow" us to have Civil Rights is simply mind boggling !
Posted by: JackFknTwist | Sep 21, 2010 4:05:35 PM
@GAYLIB: yes, name calling and vulgarity are great ways of showing that you have any clue about the political process, and about the limited pull (if any) Obama has on those senators that voted no. You're perpetually aggrieved and naive tone doesn't do much to illuminate the current situation.
Posted by: BCLance | Sep 21, 2010 4:09:51 PM
fuck off lance.
Posted by: gaylib | Sep 21, 2010 4:11:47 PM
My theory is the military brass found a way to really hold Obama's balls to the wall, and force him to delay this vote. He really has turned out to be a nightmare of a president. Anyone still touting him has got a screw loose, honestly.
Obama will be solely responsible for not only losing all the mojo Dems had achieved by 2008, but handing it right back to the Republicans. President Palin anyone?
Posted by: Bruno | Sep 21, 2010 4:12:06 PM
What is the fucking deal with some of you blaming it on Obama when it was a REPUBLICAN filibuster?
Executive orders get overturned all the damned time, writing DADT repeal into LAW is the way to get a lasting change and you want to suck off the party who filibustered the legislation.
You are your own worst enemy.
Posted by: Polyboy | Sep 21, 2010 4:14:03 PM
last I checked Pryor and Lincoln are Democrats. And if the Maj. leader didn't know how they were going to vote, maybe he should make THEM his pets, and stop worrying about who in the senate is the hottest. Obama doesn't have to issue an exec. order at this point. He just has to let stand judge Phillip's ruling that DADT is unconstitutional and DADT is dead forever. He won't do that though, because he really, really doesn't like gay people. Especially upppity ones that don't know how to stay in there place, the closet.
Posted by: gaylib | Sep 21, 2010 4:17:40 PM
It's time to take it to the streets people! When are we going to say "enough is enough"? I understand this was a vote in the Senate but Obama sat by and said nothing. I voted for Obama but he will NEVER get my vote again.
Posted by: rob | Sep 21, 2010 4:17:51 PM
I was reading all the hateful comments made by people of the religious right/Repubs on another page and came over to towleroad to get the feel of our own community. Sad to say its not that different only thing is we are attacking eachother instead of them attacking us for whom we love. =(
Posted by: Dean | Sep 21, 2010 4:20:42 PM
If you fools actually thought that President Obama could influence those conservative Democrats in a tough election year, you are more stupid and naive than we thought!
Go ahead and either not vote or vote Republican in November. You will have a rude awakening as our rights are striped away and legislation is enacted to make sure our issues never become law. Wise up fools, and stop allowing your internalized bigotry rule simple common sense!
Posted by: Brains | Sep 21, 2010 4:24:47 PM
Bruno,
Are you that naive and stupid!
Posted by: Brains | Sep 21, 2010 4:26:48 PM
Hey Brains, I think you meant to say stripped, not striped but whatever! Bottom line is, Obama is no friend of the LGBT community, especially as he professed to be. And why is or should he be our only Democratic candidate? If this system really worked FOR THE PEOPLE, we'd write in a more favorable candidate, like let's say, HILLARY!
Posted by: rob | Sep 21, 2010 4:33:55 PM