Don't Ask, Don't Tell | Military | News

Additional Details Leaked from Pentagon 'DADT' Study Show Minimal Risk to Military from Lifting Ban on Gay Troops

More details are leaking about the Pentagon's 'study' on 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' with the first part culled from surveys sent  to 400,000 active-duty and reserve troops, and 150,000 military spouses, focus group participants, and an anonymous online drop box.

Dadt The second part, according to the WaPo, "presents a plan for ending enforcement of the ban. It is not meant to serve as the military's official instruction manual on the issue but could be used if military leaders agreed, one of the sources said."

But here's the most important data that has leaked:

More than 70 percent of respondents to a survey sent to active-duty and reserve troops over the summer said the effect of repealing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy would be positive, mixed or nonexistent, said two sources familiar with the document. The survey results led the report's authors to conclude that objections to openly gay colleagues would drop once troops were able to live and serve alongside them.

One source, who has read the report in full, summarized its findings in a series of conversations this week. The source declined to state his position on whether to lift the ban, insisting it did not matter. He said he felt compelled to share the information out of concern that groups opposed to ending the ban would mischaracterize the findings. The long, detailed and nuanced report will almost certainly be used by opponents and supporters of repeal legislation to bolster their positions in what is likely to be a heated and partisan congressional debate.

Also:

Among several recommendations, the report urges an end to the military ban on sodomy between consenting adults regardless of what Congress or the federal courts might do about "don't ask, don't tell," the source said.

The report also concludes that gay troops should not be put into a special class for equal-opportunity or discrimination purposes, the individual said. The recommendation is based on feedback the study group obtained from gay troops and same-sex partners who said they do not want a special classification, according to the source. Gay troops were encouraged to participate in the survey and to submit comments to the anonymous online drop box.

The report recommends few, if any, changes to policy covering military housing and benefits, because the military must abide by the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which does not recognize same-sex marriage. Objections by troops who do not want to room or shower with openly gay troops should be handled case-by-case by commanders and should be scrutinized, the source said.

A one-year review of the policy changes is recommended as well.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. This is the study Congress, the President, the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have all said we must wait on to repeal DADT. The study is now essentially out, showing a pretty overwhelming percentage of those polled saying that allowing gay and lesbian servicemembers to serve openly would be either positive or not caring one way or another. And it also seems to say that allowing our gay and lesbian servicemembers to serve openly will have little effect on the military. This is pretty conclusive. So...get it done. Repeal DADT now. No excuses.

    Posted by: Terry | Nov 11, 2010 9:06:41 AM


  2. They some nerve to base my civil rights on the results of a survey. Just doing the survey made this change a whole lot more difficult than it would have been if they'd just done it and told the troops to live with it.

    People on all sides of the argument will twist the numbers every which way, like they do with every other survey. For the John McCains of the world, no number will ever be high enough.

    This thing was rigged in the beginning to be a clusterfuck and that's exactly what we have.

    Posted by: justiceontherocks | Nov 11, 2010 9:15:53 AM


  3. So if they did a new survey, that showed that most serving do not want women, blacks, jews or other non-white christians to serve, would they throw them out too?

    Posted by: patrick nyc | Nov 11, 2010 9:26:23 AM


  4. What possible relevance do the opinions of troops' spouses have? They aren't serving, they aren't affected. What a waste of time.

    And if I were a gay soldier, I wouldn't trust the "anonymous online drop box" unless I accessed it from a public computer.

    Posted by: Paul R | Nov 11, 2010 4:39:00 PM


  5. All of this just adds the mountain of evidence that future generations will point at, at a time when LGBT people are accepted for who they are, and ask, "What was the fuss all about again?"

    Posted by: Ian | Nov 17, 2010 5:11:24 PM


Post a comment







Trending


« «Watch: Joy Behar, Signorile on the GLAAD Glee 'Tranny' Debate« «