White House: Obama Will Mention Pending Vote on NY Marriage Equality at Fundraiser, But Won't Endorse It
Amid rampant speculation about whether or not Obama will "evolve" enough on the issue of marriage equality to endorse it at tonight's LGBT fundraiser at the New York Sheraton, or whether he will mention it at all comes some confirmation from the White House, the Atlantic reports:
White House Press Secretary Jay Carney expects President Obama to break his recent silence on same-sex marriage at an LGBT fundraiser tonight. But he doesn't anticipate any surprises, "I'm sure he will mention it," said Carney to the White House press pool. "And I think [he'll] make the point that he always has that he believes that this is something that states should be able to decide."
The Washington Blade has Carney's full transcript.
As I mentioned earlier, protesters are gathering outside the Sheraton to demonstrate against Obama's foot-dragging on LGBT issues.
In an article posted earlier today, Sam Stein noted the duality within the LGBT community over the progress that's been made:
The combined effect has been incredibly beneficial to LGBT causes, casting them up the list of pressing political topics. But it also has produced a tension in its own right among gay rights groups. There is, on the one hand, the veritable old guard, who recalls the days when they were part of the national political sideshow. And then there is a new generation of activists -- not all of them young, per se -- far less willing to see their priorities addressed in incremental fashion.
We'll be letting you know what happens inside and outside of the fundraiser, later.
In related news, Good As You has published a fantasy Obama speech. We wish.




Obama = 2012 loser.
Posted by: Max | Jun 23, 2011 5:24:02 PM
His press secretary is so annoying.
Posted by: Alex | Jun 23, 2011 5:24:13 PM
I just got back from South Africa and can only wish that President Obama has the courage and foresight of President Mandela who wrote gay rights into the constitution despite it being an even less popular concept in South Africa.
Posted by: Alex | Jun 23, 2011 5:28:05 PM
I hope he comes out for marriage equality soon, but I don't see any point in him attaching his name or presidency to a local NY bill that may in the end fail. I doubt NY senate democrats want these delicate negotiations to be heightened with Obama's endorsement. If he was going to come out in favor of the bill he should have done so a month ago. Otherwise, why bother at this point?
Posted by: Brian in Texas | Jun 23, 2011 5:35:53 PM
Gay Marriage = States should decide
Immigration Reform = Federal issue
You can't have it both ways, bud.
Posted by: nodnarb | Jun 23, 2011 5:40:27 PM
If only...:http://www.goodasyou.org/good_as_you/2011/06/a-president-in-nyc-theoretical-remarks-as-ideally-prepared-evolvealready.html?utm_source=feedburner+mod&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+modurban2+%28modurban+2%29
Posted by: Wavin' Dave | Jun 23, 2011 5:50:24 PM
All he wants is our money. Where are our rights? Where is the progress on the commitments he made to us in 08? What a huge disappointment in every sense of the word.
He won't be getting a cent of my money.
Posted by: adam | Jun 23, 2011 5:59:29 PM
States decide = a politically neutral non-decision. It's weak and cowardly, and all politics. He doesn't want to alienate the gay community or the African American churches so he tries to walk a line in between. If he really is for marriage equality and is re-elected in 2012 maybe it will prove to be a smart political move; until then I'm no longer holding my breath for change.
Posted by: Davey | Jun 23, 2011 6:01:16 PM
what a d-bag. he's going down in history as the first mixed-race president, yet doesn't share the same view as most of Americans about equality
Posted by: Trey | Jun 23, 2011 6:17:38 PM
OBAMA,
I AM TIRED OF DONATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION. THE TIME HAS COME FOR CHANGE.
T.S.
Posted by: TIM | Jun 23, 2011 6:17:52 PM
I'd expect nothing more from him. I'm surprised he feels enough pressure to even spout this lie.
The majority of Americans support repealing DADT, but he wouldn't do it (and still hasn't). The majority of Americans support marriage equality, but he won't. If he won't even support positions he's "supposed" to have that the majority of Americans also support, what good is he?
He's a corporate puppet, like the rest of them. Only worse, because he lied and said he wasn't. At least Dick Cheney (who supports marriage equality!) had the balls to look you in the eye and tell you exactly how he was destroying this country.
Posted by: ohplease | Jun 23, 2011 6:18:15 PM
Don't give Obama a cent until he fulfills the promises he made to us in 08. How can you continue to give him money if he doesn't even keep the very simple promises he made to us back then?
Look, I know DADT is on schedule to be repealed. That's probably the only real thing that's happened. However, he did it reluctantly and as a result of the pressure we brought to bear.
What about all the other things? His Democrats had almost 2 years of a majority in both the Senate and House where they could have done so much for us. They failed, Obama failed. No money for these guys.
Posted by: adam | Jun 23, 2011 6:22:20 PM
Blah,Blah,Blah Obama threw us under the bus,blah blah blah,don't give him another cent,blah blah blah,the GayTM is closed.Same tired dribble from the same ignorant fags who dont get how politics works.This is what represents our community?
Posted by: Rocky | Jun 23, 2011 6:35:53 PM
BTW its your ignorance and single-issue attitude that ensures a republican win.Bunch of bitter,selfish assholes.
Posted by: Rocky | Jun 23, 2011 6:38:19 PM
No hope.
No change.
Posted by: Inside | Jun 23, 2011 6:38:26 PM
seriously I understand guys....I do and feel the same way, I think he wont do or say anything large..until after 2012...which at this point is expected....we're on the sidelines I know...but really, whats the alternative? Romney, Bachmann...? Aaargh - I wanna wretch! Just Hold your Nose and Vote for Obama...as Gay americans,Id rather have a dem then GOP anyday.
Posted by: Disgusted American | Jun 23, 2011 6:48:06 PM
I'm getting to the stage where I don't care who wins the next election. Who knows, I might even vote for Michelle Bachmann.
Bachmann couldn't be any worse than Obama on gay rights. She might be anti-gay but Obama is almost as bad.
Posted by: adam | Jun 23, 2011 6:49:49 PM
Ummmm, seriously Adam.....??? Why not be a Jew and Vote for Hitler? ..Bachmann HATES GAYS - she'd make our lives a living hell....Just Vote O ....really!
Posted by: Disgusted American | Jun 23, 2011 7:07:09 PM
@NODNARB
No, immigration and border safety actually are federal issues. Marriage on the other hand is unfortunately a state by state issue.
Posted by: Brian in Texas | Jun 23, 2011 7:09:32 PM
Um, I hope this isn't true, but it's being tweeted from inside Obama's LGBT fundraiser that the President evoked Election Night 2008 by saying, "It was a perfect night."
Um, not for us, Mr. President. Ever hear of Prop 8. Most of us gays have. Not only those 3000 miles away in California. We remember your election night very, very well. "Perfect" is not how we think of it.
If you said that, it was perhaps the most tone-deaf, boneheaded, moronic foot-in-the-mouth statement of your presidency, Obama.
Please, please, let this be a false tweet. Ugh.
Posted by: Zlick | Jun 23, 2011 7:12:42 PM
Get off Obama's back on the NY vote. Be realistic: he has ZERO chance of convincing any Republican NY Senator (or Diaz) to vote for the bill. And almost anything Obama says can have the reverse effect of upsetting our NY Republicans and interfering with the behind-doors political negotiations that Cuomo seems to be handling well. Obama needs to stay out of the NY battle at this time.
And for those who are upset at Obama -- accept the fact that he's going to be the Democratic nominee, and then name a single Republican presidential candidate who would be even 50% as favorable on gay issues.
Posted by: MiddleoftheRoader | Jun 23, 2011 7:18:53 PM
Lots of freeper plants here these days.
Or malcontents from the far left progressives.
Get real. President Obama is the Democratic nominee for 2012.
You can choose him, or you can choose a Republican.
It is a binary decision. There is no middle ground. There is no other option.
Grow up.
The rhetoric is silly. It is unhelpful.
And the nonsense about not giving any money, etc. Newsflash: the "boycott" failed. Primarily because it was organized and espoused by people who never gave any money in the first place.
I guess we learned nothing from 2010. DOMA repeal, trans-inclusive ENDA, etc. are DEAD at the Federal level.
And everyone who sat out the election or actively campaigned against the Democrats "to teach them a lesson" is responsible.
There were no lessons taught. It was a massive, self-defeating fail.
But if you want to do it again because you think someone it will somehow sink in a couple of decades hence when the Supreme Court returns to a liberal majority, go for it.
Shameful.
Posted by: Josh G. | Jun 23, 2011 9:58:54 PM
Thank you JOGH G. (MIDDLEOFTHEROADER, etc.) Right on.
And for those of you who say Obama's done nothing for us, you're simply in denial. He's clearly on our side and DADT truly is on the way out and the way it's going out is the best way to make sure it's a peaceful departure.
Posted by: David R. | Jun 24, 2011 12:35:59 AM
Um, Josh G., but if you thought the Democrats lost everywhere because gay donors and gay contributors stayed home, you are sadly deluded about the power of the gay vote and money machine. Drop in the bucket.
Posted by: Zlick | Jun 24, 2011 1:03:10 AM
@ ZLICK: I don't think JOSH G. was referring only to the gays, but liberals in general, who stayed home while the Tea Party went wild.
Posted by: David R. | Jun 24, 2011 1:33:28 AM