BigGayDeal.com

North Carolina Marriage Amendment Might "Invalidate Domestic Violence Protections"

The amendment will be debated tomorrow in NC's senate. A law professor warns its language is so vague that it could "invalidate domestic violence protections for members of unmarried couples, as an Ohio court did with even narrower language in its state’s marriage amendment." We never needed those anyway. 

And look at how Republicans got it to the floor. They allegedly laundered it

Senate leaders will start their debate on the proposed constitutional amendment to ban same-sex unions Monday afternoon. But they didn’t want anyone to know about it.

According to the public notices released today, the Senate Judiciary 1 committee will be meeting Monday on H61, “Speaker/Pro Tem Term Limits” - a proposal to limit the numbers of years House and Senate members can serve as leaders of their chambers. 

But a new version of the bill leaked to WRAL Friday night shows the bill the committee will take up Monday has absolutely nothing to do with term limits. The new H61 is an amended version of the constitutional ban on same-sex marriage.

You can try to look it up at the legislature’s website, but you won’t find it there.

If it passes the senate, it goes to a referendum in 2012. At that point, it could bring droves of Republicans to the polls to vote against Obama, too. That's incidental, I'm sure.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. If only there was a way that we could screw the fags without in ANY way inconveniencing REAL people.

    Posted by: TampaZeke | Sep 11, 2011 7:38:14 PM


  2. Sounds a lot like the Dem's "You have to pass it to know what's in it" line.

    Seriously Penn, do you even TRY to be an objective journalist when writing these updates?

    Posted by: Steve | Sep 11, 2011 7:53:33 PM


  3. @Penn: Also, you should probably note that an update to this story, made last night (so it was present when you posted this) notes that a corrected public notice has been sent out.

    Also, from the article:
    "It's fair to note that in the past, Democrats have used this tactic, too - but not on anything as controversial or high-profile as a constitutional amendment on marriage. In comparison, House GOP leaders have generally avoided this tactic: when they've rolled out PCS with different content, they've noted it on the public meeting announcement."

    Sounds like this is just business as usual for both sides. Pot meet kettle anyone?

    Posted by: Steve | Sep 11, 2011 8:01:18 PM


  4. Ah, I see Steve, so since both sides use the tactics, that makes it okay. Well, at least we know where you're morals lay.

    Posted by: LiamB | Sep 11, 2011 8:06:23 PM


  5. err ... your. >.>

    Posted by: LiamB | Sep 11, 2011 8:07:24 PM


  6. Hey Steve if you don't like the content of this blog, start your own.

    Posted by: homer | Sep 11, 2011 9:19:11 PM


  7. steve do you even try to not be the whore of some oligarch?

    Be sure to cash those Koch brother checks , Oh they don't pay you? Oh, you are a cheap whore for your masters

    Posted by: say what | Sep 11, 2011 9:23:21 PM


  8. Enough about the bitching back and forth is anyone put these repugs in there place or once again are we gonna be a bunch of panties yet again

    Posted by: xzavier | Sep 12, 2011 3:24:36 AM


Post a comment







Trending


« «Is the Japanese Mafia Exploiting Workers at Fukushima?« «