Kim Kardashian | News

Sanctity of Marriage Watch: Kim Kardashian Files for Divorce After 72 Days

Kim Kardashian and Kris Humphries are the new poster children for the non-sanctity of marriage.

TMZ reports: Kardashian

"Kim Kardashian will file for divorce this morning, after 72 days of not-so-wedded bliss to Kris Humphries  ... TMZ has learned. We're told even though the marriage was short, she will not seek an annulment. It's a garden variety divorce, in which Kim cites "irreconcilable differences." We're told the date of separation is listed as today, Oct. 31, 2011....The couple was married on August 20 in a lavish ceremony (see below) in Montecito, CA. There are reports that the wedding cost as much as $10 mil, which means $138,888 for every day until today."

People adds: "Yes @kimkardashian is filing for divorce this morning," Tweets Ryan Seacrest, who produces her reality show. "I touched base with her."

Watch a preview of their divorce (only on E!), AFTER THE JUMP...

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. Easy, She needed a wedding for the show. The got it done, the show has now broadcast it, now they can have another special about the divorce.

    Glad that hetros take their marriages so seriously.

    Posted by: Cam | Oct 31, 2011 12:23:18 PM

  2. Why are we still giving these idiots attention? I hate that I even commented on this. :P

    Posted by: WJP3 | Oct 31, 2011 12:30:48 PM

  3. So let me see.

    I've been married to my wonderful husband for three YEARS; I'm destroying the institution of marriage.

    This no-talent whore with a fat ass and a sex tape has been married TWICE, once to goose up the ratings of her "reality" TV show. And her second marriage doesn't survive three MONTHS. But she's defending the "sanctity" of the "holy sacrament of marriage".

    Why aren't NOM's spokescattle, Maggie "Jabba the Hater" Gallagher Srivastav and Brian "Bitter Tears" Brown condemning these losers' cavalier attitude toward marriage?!

    Posted by: One of the CA 36,000 | Oct 31, 2011 12:37:34 PM

  4. forgot to add she supposedly made a few mill off of the wedding

    Posted by: say what | Oct 31, 2011 12:37:41 PM

  5. These skandashians are the lowest form of "celebrity". Eff them all.

    Posted by: FernLaPlante | Oct 31, 2011 12:38:00 PM

  6. Kim has been taking lessons from Katie Price. They'll get back together, but then eventually divorce. Kim knows that she's not a commodity if she's in wedded bliss.

    Posted by: Ioann | Oct 31, 2011 12:39:19 PM

  7. I was so sad over this news someone had to spray glycerine in my eyes so I could look like I had cried.

    When you give up reality for money, reality has a way of biting you in your very big behind.

    Posted by: Bart | Oct 31, 2011 12:46:12 PM

  8. All of them are a bunch of stupid, moronic kunts. I wish they'd just go away forever.

    Posted by: Brian | Oct 31, 2011 12:46:59 PM

  9. And this is why I didn't want to consumer ANY of the wedding coverage. I can't stand this family....

    Posted by: Brian | Oct 31, 2011 12:50:02 PM

  10. here is what the NOM/AFA response will be:

    Once again we see how the liberal media gay agenda has destroyed the very concept of marriage.

    Posted by: Gus | Oct 31, 2011 12:51:36 PM

  11. What are the etiquette rules on returning the wedding gifts in this type of situation ? are there any ? I checked and couldn't find anything. Would they also have to refund any product endorsement payments from the wedding and/or reception ?

    Posted by: Jerry | Oct 31, 2011 12:52:05 PM

  12. Nice to see a little misogyny here in the comments section! Way to go, gays! This marriage may have be pathetic but there is no need for hatred of women.

    Posted by: mark | Oct 31, 2011 1:08:39 PM

  13. To be fair, Kim Kardashian has gone on record stating that she supports marriage equality.

    Posted by: peterparker | Oct 31, 2011 1:17:01 PM

  14. I think most guests will see Kimmy K's wedding for the grifting sham it is. It's doubtful at best Kimmy K or any Kardashian would take the ethical high ground and offer to return gifts. After all, they have zero philanthropic participation; they only show up if they get paid to. I'm guessing the "marriage" lasted just long enough to fulfill the multi-million dollar media contracts...

    Posted by: Niel M | Oct 31, 2011 1:17:53 PM

  15. I don't think we hate women, mark. We just hate THAT woman.

    Posted by: MT | Oct 31, 2011 1:18:30 PM

  16. They put on this elaborate show for the MILLIONS that were thrown their way. They are both whore.

    Posted by: Mona | Oct 31, 2011 1:34:18 PM

  17. Whores. I meant him as well as her.

    Posted by: Mona | Oct 31, 2011 1:34:52 PM

  18. It just goes to show that all the Birkin bags in the world can't save a marriage ;-)

    Posted by: oliver | Oct 31, 2011 1:35:10 PM

  19. From There are many things that you must deal with during divorce proceedings, and the return or division of wedding gifts may not be high on your list of priorities. However, when little time has passed between the wedding and divorce, it is necessary to decide what to do with the wedding gifts you received. Whom the gifts came from and their value are particular considerations that will determine what happens to the gifts.

    According to Merriam-Webster, a gift is "something voluntarily transferred by one person to another without compensation." Etiquette decrees that offering to return gifts is honorable and appropriate under certain circumstances, such as a short lived marriage. However, etiquette is not definitive, and your own moral standards may not lead you to think returning the gifts is necessary.
    If the marriage has been short in length, for example, less than one year, it would be appropriate etiquette to offer the gifts back to the people who gave them. A brief but sincere note stating that the marriage has ended and that you understand that the giver may want their gift returned will suffice. The giver can then contact you to arrange a return if she wants to.

    Posted by: Niel M | Oct 31, 2011 1:38:57 PM

  20. Well, I must say, what a bunch of jealous, grumpy, middle-aged queens decided to post their snarky views this morning! I think all this bashing of my Kim K is just because some of the bitches around here wish they had that big, sexy hubby themselves. Yeah, he's about as bright as a 15 watt bulb, but with that muscular body and that man-sized love muscle, he won't be lonely for companionship, that's for sure! Now everyone, please back off and show a little respect for a lovely young lady who's going through a tough time right now!

    Posted by: TANK | Oct 31, 2011 1:42:03 PM

  21. This is what happens when you live in a million dollar "trailer". You're still trash.

    Posted by: uffda | Oct 31, 2011 1:45:38 PM

  22. SAY WHAT: A few? She reportedly brought in $18 million dollars.

    I get that Kim Kardashian is pro-marriage equality, but it's not really so much about her personally as it is with a society that accepts any heterosexual being able to marry anyone, even a perfect stranger, make an $18 million dollar profit off of their wedding, use it as a piece of publicity media, then get divorced in less than 3 months and start all over again, and then turn around and tell same-sex couples that marriage is "too sacred" an institution for them to access.

    Anyone who thinks that same-sex marriage is just not right to being aggressively anti-marriage equality who barely batted an eye at this is a hypocrite and a moron.

    Posted by: luminum | Oct 31, 2011 1:46:00 PM

  23. People who don't take marriage seriously really tick off the folks that don't have the right. Ms. K is a fame whore, pure and simple, and her marriage was nothing but a "story arch" in the series that she calls life. Shame on all of them. Maybe this will put a stop to the Kardashian foolishness and, at the very least, Ryan Seacrest will see the light.

    Posted by: Tom | Oct 31, 2011 1:56:06 PM

  24. Ha Ha.

    KK filing for divorce and pocketing nearly $8 million for 72 days of a sham marriage. Unfortunately, in today's America that results in KK. 1. All others. 0.

    Posted by: BOB | Oct 31, 2011 2:15:55 PM

  25. Is there really anybody out there who didn't see that coming?

    Posted by: mytwocents | Oct 31, 2011 2:43:37 PM

  26. 1 2 »

Post a comment


« «NC Senator James Forrester, Who Sponsored State's Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment, Hospitalized in Grave Condition« «