Canada | Transgender

In Canada, Trans Miss Universe Contestant Ejected From Competition: VIDEO

2012JennaTalackovaJenna Talackova is 23 years old and stunning -- she looks like a taller, more elfin Gwyneth Paltrow. She was born with male body parts, but says she knew she wasn't a boy by the age of four. She began hormone therapy at 14 and underwent gender reassignment surgery at 19.

In 2010 she was a finalist in Thailand's Miss International Queen, a beauty pageant for transsexuals. This year she was one of 65 Canadian Miss Universe finalists -- until the pageant's governing body found out about her past. Then the Canadian Miss Universe website disappeared from the web for several hours, and when it resurfaced it had been scrubbed of every mention of Ms. Talackova. From CTV News:

Miss Universe Canada issued a statement Friday saying Talackova "did not meet the requirements to compete despite having stated otherwise on her entry form."

"We do, however, respect her goals, determination and wish her the best," it said.

It is, however, unclear which "requirements" Ms. Talackova failed to meet. As noted at Dear Pageant Girl, the Canadian pageant website says only:

... To qualify for the 2012 competition, you must be a Canadian Citizen and at least 18 years of age and under 27 years of age by February 1st, 2012. If you meet the basic requirements, we’ll be sending you an application form to participate in a Casting or Local pageant to select the finalists for the Miss Universe® Canada pageant.

TMs. Talackova hasn't yet released a statement, though she tweeted on Friday that she has been discriminated against unjustly, and will be speaking with a lawyer.

Watch Ms. Talackova chat up a leering interviewer AFTER THE JUMP, in a two-year old vid from the Thai pageant. Ms. Talackova first appears around the 7:30 mark.


Feed This post's comment feed


  1. She is pretty. She has all the beauty several paid surgeries could afford. Wouldn't be fair to the other surgery-free contestants though. It's about her being a tranny, but having surgeries made.

    Posted by: well-I-guess | Mar 24, 2012 7:59:04 PM

  2. He looks extremely feminine so unless he revealed his birth gender I doubt anyone would ever confuse him with a man- so why did he reveal this fact-I mean isn't the entire point of going through this costly and painful process to live your life as female?!

    Posted by: jaragon | Mar 24, 2012 9:25:32 PM

  3. Lol Mary, eloquent as always.

    Posted by: Stuart | Mar 24, 2012 11:50:56 PM

  4. What will be interesting to watch is if Ms Talackova will pursue legal recourse as the pageant’s decision once again opens up a fissure as to how one defines gender and how this may act to discriminate against those individuals who for all intensive purposes are the genders they insist they are despite events and circumstances, such as their birth which are often beyond their control.

    Posted by: scallywag | Mar 25, 2012 2:25:27 AM

  5. I'm with John on this. It is offensive to equate transsexualism and crossdressing with being gay. That is a stereotype.

    We can support trans people and crossdressers and be friends and the like, but it is a lie to suggest that gays and crossdressers are one group. In fact, it contradicts everything we have been trying to teach the world since 1969 and earlier. "LGBT" is actually a reactionary concept, not a progressive one.

    Posted by: Gus | Mar 25, 2012 4:02:36 AM

  6. Trans people do not represent gay rights. They are the complete opposite of gay rights. They are running away from being gay. Furthermore, their physical transformation indicates a fetishistic attraction to the stereotypes of gender - eg long flowing hair for a woman.

    As for Miss Universe, there's nothing nice about it. It's sexist and appeals to straight guys, many of whom are homophobic. We in the gay community shouldn't be supporting contests that are demeaning to women despite our natural tendency to do so.

    Posted by: jason | Mar 25, 2012 7:35:40 AM

  7. @Gus and Jason I personally believe that transsexuals and transvestites should be lumped together with effeminate gay men, because they all DO have in common their idolization of women and the modeling of their behavior on women. And that is demonstrated by the fact that most of those defending the inclusion of the T in LGBT are effeminate gay men.

    I mean, seriously, most effeminate gay men have no more of a male identity than most trans people do, so what really needs to be happened is that they need to be purged from the group of men, including myself, who both have a male identity and are sexually attracted to men.

    Our attempts to gain equality and be accepted socially by the mainstream are impeded as much by being associated with effeminate gay men as they are by being associated with transsexuals or transvestites, and so as long as that association remains, we will be adversely effected by it.

    So I think what we really need is a new "classification" system and a new movement that makes it clear that effeminate "gay" men are no more a part of who we are than transsexuals or transvestites are.

    Posted by: Rick | Mar 25, 2012 1:54:09 PM

  8. The effeminate queens of the world don't realize that they're a negative stereotype and they make life harder for masculine gay men like me who are not defined by our sexuality.

    When I was young and I was caught blowing our maid's son, my father forced me to dress up like a girl and perform oral sex on him because of all those effeminate limp-wristed queens out there.

    I had to wear pink panties, a training bra, and he would address me as "Princess" and if effeminate gay men hadn't done been such queens then maybe he'd have let me dress like a boy when I was blowing him.

    Posted by: Rick | Mar 25, 2012 2:07:05 PM

  9. Here's a grand idea - if more men who feel that they're "masculine" grew a pair and Came Out, and were Visible and Vocal advocates for LGBT people on a daily basis, maybe their "complaints" would end.

    as is, it won't happen.

    why? because these complainers, under their many aliases, actually have smaller balls than this sexy trans woman, who had her testicles removed.

    yup. that's why Closeted Cowards take issue with transpeople. despite physiology, they have bigger balls than the wimpy closet cases who complain about them.

    ever notice how gay men who complain about "effeminate gays" are never Out? this is because no comfortable masculine gay men have a problem with guys who are perceived as "effeminate" or "visibly gay" , or exist in some other variant of the gender-perception spectrum.

    only insecure wimps with capers for testes take issue with guys that society would label "effeminate".

    the good news: they're so wimpy they'll never come out. so we're blessedly free from having to deal with them in real life. they all sit and complain from inside the closet, and it sure is annoying, but rest assured - they'll die in there. their life is their own prison.

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Mar 25, 2012 2:22:19 PM

  10. Effeminate gay men are not transsexuals and do not want to become women. Transsexuals are women and are not merely an extreme form of effeminate gay male. They are 2 entirely different groups. To lump the 2 together is to disrespect both. I understand why the deceitful defenders of "LGBT" would like to make this about "effeminate gay men" vs. "masculine gay men" but it isn't. Gay men - masculine or effeminate - are men. And transsexual women are women.

    Stop promoting lies and stereotypes in the name of the myth of LGBT.

    Posted by: Gus | Mar 25, 2012 3:38:06 PM

  11. Personally, as an openly-gay man, I don't know why any of you are talking about "lumping together".

    Distancing yourself from ______ in order to save your own ass, or win the favor of, some bigoted person or group is the epitome of cowardice.

    I'm an openly gay man. I stand in solidarity with all LGBT people, no matter where they exist in some amorphous concept of "masc or femme", no matter what their ethnic background is or their form of gender-expression or identity.

    an attack against a transperson is an attack against a gay person, and a bisexual, and a lesbian. any attack on someone because they deviate from any form of "expected Norm" is an attack on EVERYONE who deviates from any expected norm.

    and real men understand this. cowardly boys distance themselves from others in order to hide.

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Mar 25, 2012 3:46:46 PM

  12. Then why don't you include Tibetans, labor unions and Appalachian mine workers in the alphabet soup as well? Are you a coward, distancing yourself from them and leaving them to face their oppression alone?

    You don't have any argument as to why "LGBT" makes any sense. You just assert it as if it is a fact of nature. And then you call people names if they dissent. I hope people read your comments and see, perhaps for the first time, that LGBT is not based on anything other than a kind of religious decree and a lot of abuse for anyone who challenges it. It has no logical foundation.

    Last point: Just b/c we don't classify ourselves as LGBT doesn't mean we hate Ts or wouldn't support them as friends. There are a lot of friendly groups out there that gays support - women, Dems, labor, etc. - but that doesn't make us part and parcel.

    Posted by: Gus | Mar 25, 2012 8:39:44 PM

  13. @LIttlekiwi
    I understand your deeply held position. I imagine you are rather young. I have lived long enough to learn that just because we are all oppressed doesn't mean we have anything else in common. Lumping us together feels to me like ghettoization.
    While inclusion is nice some places I came out and went to my gay community center to meet (meat?) gay men. Not women; I don't have sex with them. Not trans males because I like to swallow and they can't ejaculate. I don't see what is wrong in wanting a space just for ourselves. I don't see anything wrong in networking to help eachother as well. Civil rights are not a zero-sum game. More rights for one are more rights for all. So it makes sense to join forces in this way. But to be uninterested in joining force does not make us evil. It makes us in dissagreement with you. Unless you think yourself some sort of god, then you should realize your opinion is just one of many viewpoints.
    Also what you do is call "ad hominem." it is to attack a person rather than his argument. Many people do it and it is a logical fallacy.
    Bigotry is a biological imperative. You yourself are being intolerant of intolerance. People have a right to share a dissenting viewpoint without being called names for it. Is it not so?
    I do appreciate your passion. I would like to see it more judicialy applied.

    Posted by: H8Str8s | Mar 26, 2012 12:13:31 AM

  14. anyone who thinks that "you're being intolerant of intolerance" makes intellectual sense only proves me right.

    your complaint, "H8STR8", that LGBT people being lumped together makes it harder for you to attend "gay places" where you'll be able to ingest male ejaculate is puzzling. You don't like there being an LGBT-inclusive community, as opposed to a strictly gay male one, because to you being gay is just about finding sex partners? That's odd. I outgrew that sort of mindset by my 19 birthday. Despite your claimed age, you're still only caring about finding people to have sex with? That's....odd.. so I'll just leave it at that and be thankful I'm not related to you.

    i suppose my family is insane. two straight parents, a straight sister, me the gay son, and yet we all stand in solidarity the the trans communities.

    Now, people are of course allowed to share a dissenting opinion - i'm not sure what your complaint is, though. I'm not stopping anyone from showing everyone how baseless and unintelligent their chosen opinions are.

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Mar 26, 2012 12:33:37 AM

  15. You really don't understand the idea of being intollerant of intollerance?
    I didn't say I didn't like LGBT inclusivity. I don't understand it. You seem to think it is a logical grouping. I don't see it. I have suffered more injustice at the hands of lesbians who knew I was gay than any other source, since I became and adult. That seems odd even to me but it is true.
    My position is not that it is bad per se, even though it still feels like ghettoization to me. My position is that I don't see the "naturalness" of the grouping.
    When I was a young man, I was looking for sex with gay men. I am not ashamed of that. I don't understand what seems odd to you about that, or that I like to swallow. It is simply a turn-on for me. No ejaculate equals no turn-on.
    I am a misanthrope. I don't seek out anyones company other than my companion of twenty years. I was stating that "When I came out" I was looking for that and didn't understand the grouping. I was sincerly confused. I still am.
    I don't see why you can't disagree in a civil maner. Why is it you can't be polite in the way you disagree? You seem, because of that, to be a mean spirited person.
    I feel for you.

    Posted by: H8Str8s | Mar 26, 2012 1:50:11 AM

  16. @littlekiwi
    As far as I can see, going to a gay community center is for one of two reasons; to meet people for sexual or political activity. Not everyone is politcaly active. I am not. I don't go to such communit centers anymore because of that and the fact they all like to use the "Q" word which I object to. For more on that see my post at the end of the ohio suicide story so you can attack me personally there as well.
    "Unintelligent and baseless" There you go showing your insecurities again. What, did you not finish high-school or something so you are insecure about your intelligence? That is what it looks like to me. Just saying.

    Posted by: H8Str8s | Mar 26, 2012 1:59:53 AM

  17. @Gus It depends on how you define being a man. If you are using a strictly anatomical definition, then you are correct--anyone who does not want to trade their penis in for a vagina is technically a man.

    On the other hand, gender is also about identity. And when I am around an effeminate gay man, I absolutely do not feel that I am in the presence of a man. I feel as though I am in the presnece of a gender-confused individual who is anatomically male, but who is trying very hard to behave as much like a woman as possible, without actually changing their anatomy. They even use the female vernacular to refer to themselves and each other ("she", "girl", Miss______, "her", etc.)

    Their friends tend to be women, their cultural icons are all women, their interests more closely parallel those of women than of menl; they almost always side with women in disputes with men What, then, is male about them--and what differentiates them from transsexuals--other than the fact that they still have a penis? Seriously.

    You say that transsexuals are "women," but that notion is based entirely on what these individuals say about their own psychological state, not on any genetic evidence or any other kind of scientific basis. So I have great difficulty accepting that they are completely different from effeminate gay men who basically identify with women rather than men in every possible way, albeit without wanting to go so far as to actually change their anatomy.

    Could it be that some of them don't want a sex change simply because of the trauma and expense involved rather than because they really feel like men.

    You are saying they are totally different in kind, but to me, it seems more like a difference in degree...

    Posted by: Rick | Mar 26, 2012 10:31:46 AM

  18. @H8STR8S You cannot reason with the Far Left, any more than you can reason with the Far Right. Both groups are full of insecure people who take psychological comfort from adhering blindly to a set-in-stone ideology that instructs them on how to think in every situation......which frees them from having to think for themselves and face the world the way it really is, in all its complexity. It is their insecurity that drives their intolerance and hostility towards anyone that disagrees with them about anything.....and both tend to resort to personal attacks when confronted with anyone who does not adhere to their ideology.

    Most of the "gay" men who want to include transsexuals as one of us are, as I say, effeminate.....and one reason they want to do so is to try to continue to legitimize effeminate behavior as the gay norm. They are deeply fearful of a change in the male culture that will make homosexuality acceptable--but only if it is not coupled with effeminacy......which is where we are headed, as more and more straight men "loosen up" their sexual mores and their emotional loyalties.

    The culture of effeminacy is doomed in the long run...and that is threatening to a lot of gay men who have invested so heavily in its continuation.

    Hope that helps you to understand the motives of some of these people.

    Posted by: Rick | Mar 26, 2012 10:47:49 AM

  19. H8STR8 - i hear you loud and clear. to YOU, going to an LGBT Centre, or gay village, is a place for you to find partners so you can consume male ejaculate.

    that's lovely. and by lovely i mean pathetic and disgusting. I just turned 30. I have no idea how old you are, but I can safely say that I'm relieved I don't share your mindset.

    You may continue to "feel for me" - but remember, I'm not the one miserably walking around looking for semen to drink, and blaming trans people and lesbians for my inability to do so.

    you're very odd.

    and rick, as we all know, is a closeted wimp with a father who never loved him. and that's why he's angry at trans people and men he deems "femme". his dad didn't love him, and he blames "fems" for the fact that his father was an unloving bigot.

    the fact that he can't SHOW HIMSELF proves that he's nowhere near the "masculine man" he wishes he was, and his father wished he was. one more sad closet case, destined to die alone and forgotten.

    not that any of us will shed a tear.

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Mar 26, 2012 1:50:42 PM


    Posted by: HonestMe | Mar 26, 2012 2:33:52 PM

  21. To those thinking she should have been disqualified for having had "cosmetic surgeries", do we know she's even had breast implants? She was on hormone therapy since age fourteen, she could have grown her own very nice pair. And no one is judging what is in her bikini bottoms, are they?

    Posted by: Book 7 | Mar 26, 2012 8:28:30 PM

  22. Uhm... IF we look at this differently, IF a natural born woman enters a gay beauty pageant and goes to the finals, and eventually has the running to win AND the officials find out, will this be the same issue?

    Posted by: aina | May 8, 2012 10:04:12 PM

  23. This is extremely unfair to real women who were actually born women, who have real breasts, real hips and real hair. You know what? James Brown was right when he said "this is a man's world".. it's amazing how men get more privileges in society, like this event happening, viagra on the market for men's erections- but they can't cure BREAST CANCER for women with REAL breasts to save theirs!! Now don't get me wrong, she is very good looking, and I agree with people changing themselves-- but for self- improvement though- not to impress anybody else! I have many trans friends who are transwomen, HOTTER than this woman, HAVE NEVER HAD PLASTIC SURGERY, whose hair is all real that they grew out themselves, DON'T even need to compete in beauty pageants to feel beautiful or show the public that they have sex appeal, strong confidence, and high self esteem!!! I have quite a few F-M trans friends who aren't trying to compete in the MR. UNIVERSE pageant, and don't need to hire GLORIA ALLRED to get their point across and deal with all the discrimination that they face daily.. The fact of the matter is that she LIED on the application and being a beauty queen is a JOB. As a beauty queen you are seen as a role model and public figure who is supposed to be TRUSTED, whose words to the public is important and influential. Beauty pageants were originally created for beauty with a purpose- to show young ladies that being beautiful, educated, talented, respectable and prominent is better than being another statistic, barefoot and a pregnant/stepford wife who only cleans house, cooks and pleasures her man- beauty pageants are NOT silly. Every single Miss Universe pageant titleholder has had something special about them that helped them win. Obviously the majority of them have a talent, otherwise they couldn't have competed successfully on the national stage. Now, I don't agree with anyone who has had plastic surgery of any type entering these pageants- anywhere in the world- especially not Miss Universe- the pageant with the best and most coveted crown on the planet. I don't even agree with little girls competing in pageants- hence the Jonbenet Ramsey case.. This is because little girls look up to these women and they will believe it will be okay to get plastic surgery, believing that plastic surgery will make their peers, the public and men fall in love with them. We as humankind already have a problem with society, mainstream media, and celebrities setting a terrible example and making young ladies believe that the sexier they look, the more jobs and privileges in society they'll get, that behaving badly is okay, having a criminal record is okay.... what's next? Are they going to allow women who have had abortions and children before to actually compete too? What about the good women who are all real and don't look fake and promiscuous- have real hair, real nails, real breasts, a real butt, menstruals and can bear children competing? I apologize to anyone if I sound like I am sending mixed messages and getting off topic..

    Posted by: anonymous | Nov 21, 2012 8:15:44 AM

  24. Now, not to sound bigoted, but rules are rules- outdated or not, just like the Constitution that America has. And as a proud member of the LGBT community, a proud and feminine bisexual woman, I AM NOT discriminating against the community- worldwide, just stating my opinions.

    Posted by: anonymous | Nov 21, 2012 8:44:39 AM

  25. « 1 2

Post a comment


« «Rick Santorum Releases Notably Insane Campaign Ad: VIDEO« «