2012 Election | Ann Coulter | Barack Obama | Bill Maher | News

Ann Coulter Tries To Convince Bill Maher Racism Ended In 1964: VIDEO

Coultermaher

Bill Maher was more than happy to debate conservative author Ann Coulter on his HBO show last night, and she was more than happy to bring her best, brightest theories, like the idea, the basis for her latest book, that racism is over here in the United States.

Watch her attempt to convince her host of something so obviously not true AFTER THE JUMP.

Maher also spent some time last night picking apart the 34 various calamities anti-gay group Focus on the Family claimed would come to fruition should Obama win in 2008, including their fears that abortion would be free on demand, guns would be seized, the Boy Scouts of America would be abolished and the pledge of allegiance would become a thing of the past. None of those things happened.

Watch Maher and Coulter's exchange AFTER THE JUMP.

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. What Ann needs to admit is that the movie "Species" is actually based on her conception and early life before she went into psychological cannibalism.

    Posted by: Polyboy | Oct 13, 2012 9:50:34 PM


  2. Proof that some people are out of touch with reality or deaf, dumb and blind.

    Posted by: Bob | Oct 13, 2012 10:35:08 PM


  3. She says that it's a new dress, but it's the same as every dress she's ever worn. But as others have said, who cares? She's hardly relevant.

    Posted by: Anon | Oct 14, 2012 5:48:49 AM


  4. And Ann's vagina sealed shut in 1994 from years of disuse.

    Posted by: FuryOfFirestorm | Oct 14, 2012 6:11:21 AM


  5. You're missing one of the more important points: the 34 calamities expected by FOF if Obama got elected. They were actually 0.5 / 34. They did correctly predict the repael of DADT, but were wrong about its consequences. Here's a longer discussion:

    http://www.patheos.com/blogs/lovejoyfeminism/2012/10/this-is-the-most-important-election-of-all-time-again.html

    Posted by: Diogenes Arktos | Oct 14, 2012 8:13:39 AM


  6. I love Bill Maher but I will not watch anything that Coulter is on. I wish people would stop giving her a platform to speak.

    Posted by: Kevin | Oct 14, 2012 8:42:58 AM


  7. Ah, Ann Coulter, the ultimate fame whore of the Republican Party. Emphasis on the "whore".
    The sexy Michelle Bachmann, the alluring Sarah Palin, ah yes, Ann Coulter, who has slept with nearly all of the....oh I digress. The poster girl for vacuous blonde Connecticut privileged debutantes who really really needs to hold an aspirin between her knees and go back east and become what she really is, a brainless housefrau (and that's not a snipe to stay-at-home spouses) She sicken me and makes me throw up more than a little in my mouth.

    Posted by: BrokebackBob | Oct 14, 2012 9:16:31 AM


  8. I love Ann Coulter. I don't agree with anything she says, but I get a kick out of her defiant, misguided, right-wing arrogance...and her knack for infuriating (or at least irritating) the ultra-left. As wayward as she is, she's entertaining as hell.

    Posted by: Miguel A. Mendoza | Oct 14, 2012 9:43:11 AM


  9. I read your book, Ann. Always a tough read, as are all your books, but you are funny in a comical sort of way. In fact, you are probably the best conservative stand-up comedienne around. Better than Greg Gutfield, at least.

    But, Ann, I can assure you. Those of us who live boot to ground and travel by bus and train or on foot and not in a FOX limousine can tell you that racism is not dead.

    It did not disappear with the Civil Rights Act of 1964 or the Voting Rights Act or Title IX. It definitely did not disappear with the election of Mr. Obama.

    Racism is still here, Ann. You're white. How the hell would you know?

    Have you been "stopped and frisked" here in NYC simply for walking with a friend in a Queens public housing project?

    Has your nephew been slammed up against a building wall by two NYC cops with one sticking his hand in each trouser pocket, looking for contraband (and, according to the nephew, lingering just a little too long feeling around in the pockets)?

    Have you been shoved against the same building wall by the third NYC cop for protesting that your nephew (a straight A student, obedient and well-behaved) has been slammed against the building wall with too much force?

    Ann, you're a silly woman. It's OK to earn a living being a provocative comedienne. It's OK to generate controversy to sell your books.

    But, it's a crime and a disservice to the truth to say that racism in the USA in 2012 is dead. It is not. I guarantee you, Ann, should Mitt Romney win, it will get worse. Police brutality will increase. Neighborhood vigilantism will increase. Attacks on people of colour by disaffected, emboldened white racists will increase.

    Meanwhile, Ann, you will continue to drink and party with your GoProudGirlfriends, rich from book sales and talking-head appearances, oblivious to the racism that surrounds your palace of delusion.

    Posted by: jamal49 | Oct 14, 2012 12:15:10 PM


  10. I agree we should not care what this whore for the Republican party says. I suppose that's why she is in her underwear on TV - to show us that she is a political trollop. It does not disguise that she is a hate filled, altogether nasty person.

    Posted by: John Freeman | Oct 14, 2012 12:33:03 PM


  11. Anne also repeats the Religious Right's tired lie that it was the conservatives and not the liberals that supported civil rights. She should at least be honest (!) and admit that she's confusing today's stands of the two parties with their opposite stands of the early 1960s.

    Posted by: Diogenes Arkots | Oct 14, 2012 1:35:24 PM


  12. she doesn't actually believe a word she says or writes.

    but she knows there are legions of complete idiots and bigots out there who will pay to have the lies they tell themselves reaffirmed by her.

    just like Trump knew Obama was born in America. By pretending he felt otherwise he garnered the Bigotty Nitwit vote.

    it's pandering to the lowest of the low. typical conservative tactic.

    Posted by: LittleKiwi | Oct 14, 2012 4:26:46 PM


  13. That blonde guy needs his roots done but his dress is great.

    Posted by: dards | Oct 14, 2012 6:05:23 PM


  14. HATE will NEVER go away. Hate, love, jealousy, envy, pride, etc., are all part of the HUMAN CONDITION. SOME people just need to grow the F up and stop endlessly whining and finding offense. And stop using the old, tired race card when sh*t doesn't go your way or stranger doesn't smile at you on the street. Stop acting like PMS-ing teenage girls. EVERYBODY, REGARDLESS of 'race' has to deal with irrational hate directed at them. It's a part of life.

    However, we have had laws that legally entitled some people [based on their 'race', skin tone, etc.,] to more than equal status under the law. Not 'equal' status, but MORE THAN EQUAL. This has been the case for 40 years. How many other countries in the world grant special legal status to some 'oppressed' so-called minorities that gives them more than equal status under the law? VERY FEW, in fact the U.S. is probably the only nation that has done this for almost a half century now.

    Posted by: ratbastard | Oct 15, 2012 8:28:13 AM


  15. @Diogenes Arkots,

    The Democrats traditionally OPPOSED civil rights for black folks. They were the preferred party among the white southern elite class up until well into the 60s, even the 70s. JFK had to have his arm repeatedly twisted to act on civil rights legislation. Even LBJ said about his Great Society and civil rights legislation that, quote: 'It'll keep the [N-word] voting Democrat for the next 300 years.' He was sure right about that, and should have included homosexuals, if it wasn't for the fact 'progressives' in the 60s, even into the 70s, couldn't have cared less about homosexuals and in fact were just as 'homophobic' as anyone else.

    Posted by: ratbastard | Oct 15, 2012 8:33:43 AM


  16. She really meant racism against whites!

    Posted by: chuck | Oct 15, 2012 11:06:04 AM


  17. Why do you give a fraud like Annthrax any publicity? Obviously she has a new book to pimp and a pathological need to be noticed, but no need at all to be truthful or sane. Ignore her and all willowy blonde wingnuts.

    Posted by: Onnyjay | Oct 15, 2012 6:09:18 PM


  18. « 1 2

Post a comment







Trending


« «Citing Gay Marriage Ban, Ala. Court Denies Lesbian Adoption Rights« «