Aaron Schock | Gay Marriage | Illinois | News

Aaron Schock Not Sure Why He Doesn't Support Gay Marriage: 'Uh, Well...I Just Haven't' - VIDEO


The turquoise belt-burning Congressman from Illinois, Aaron Schock, was asked by reporters why he doesn't support marriage equality. Schock was speechless at first, before stuttering out a bunch of gobble-dy-gook.


(via jmg)

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. He got lost in a mental corn maze in that clip. Complete babble.

    Posted by: Christian | Jan 31, 2013 6:20:17 PM

  2. Bottoms say the darndest things.

    Posted by: Mike | Jan 31, 2013 6:25:05 PM

  3. Yikes. He couldn't possibly avoid the issue more painfully than that. His eyes were all over the place.

    Posted by: Bollux | Jan 31, 2013 6:26:23 PM

  4. He's a deep closet case. Girl come out of your closet.

    Posted by: Patrick | Jan 31, 2013 6:32:28 PM

  5. Let's see... (1) His upbringing (2) His constituents (3) People can change

    How about applying #3 to #1? As to #2: how about the idea that you are elected to do what is right and not be a puppet?

    Posted by: Diogenes Arktos | Jan 31, 2013 6:36:17 PM

  6. Boy he makes my gaydar ping like crazy.

    Posted by: jexer | Jan 31, 2013 6:45:42 PM

  7. Deep in the closet? He is flaming so much the air around him burns

    Posted by: Steve | Jan 31, 2013 6:46:44 PM

  8. And, furthermore, whereas insomuch as there are values, and values reflecting on individuals, and constituents, and, with regard to the question, be as it were.

    Posted by: Nick | Jan 31, 2013 6:57:20 PM

  9. "Daddy -- can you help with the thinking?!"

    Posted by: Gry | Jan 31, 2013 7:05:44 PM

  10. Did you catch his little gulp near the end?

    Posted by: David Ehrenstein | Jan 31, 2013 7:06:59 PM

  11. Why are so many of our closet cases active traitors against our interests ?
    If they don't want to come out why don't they just STFU.
    Melman was a serious activist against us......and then burst forth with his confessional BS.
    I think we need to have a coherent policy/attitude towards activists /traitors who later seek to repent for all the damage they have caused.
    I guess I'm not in a forgiving mood.....take note Mr. Schock.

    Posted by: JackFknTwist | Jan 31, 2013 7:08:43 PM

  12. And, such as, the Iraq, like so, and such as...

    Posted by: Robert | Jan 31, 2013 7:10:22 PM

  13. Miss Teen South Carolina. Would you care to rebut?


    Posted by: Marc C | Jan 31, 2013 7:15:45 PM

  14. This oaf is an elected Congressman ?
    Enough said.

    Posted by: JackFknTwist | Jan 31, 2013 7:20:59 PM

  15. Try this one next time, Aaron: "The derogatory comments I made yesterday were a reflection of thoughts in my head, but they are not how I feel." It works for every situation! And I bet, deep-down, you still regret burning that turquoise belt, girl!

    Posted by: Ernie | Jan 31, 2013 7:22:53 PM

  16. i can answer the question for him ---> he's from Peoria; the same city where the bishop is a raging hypocrite & one of his priests had to cal 911 to get him out of handcuffs. 'nuff said?

    Posted by: mike/ | Jan 31, 2013 7:28:29 PM

  17. Stop plucking the eyebrows! Gay gay gay! Viva Las Gaygas!

    Posted by: Wayne | Jan 31, 2013 7:28:49 PM

  18. @ Patrick - If he had a map, a GPS, and a compass, he still couldn't find his way out of that closet.

    Posted by: Mike in the Tundra | Jan 31, 2013 7:52:36 PM

  19. Tweeze my eyebrows any further and my voice will be so high garage doors will open in New Jersey. Please.

    Posted by: Geoff | Jan 31, 2013 7:58:51 PM

  20. Please don't use "bottom" as an insult. It's homophobic and we have enough problems with people like Shock.

    Posted by: Polyboy | Jan 31, 2013 8:02:55 PM

  21. Schock-ed, shock-ed, cock-ed.

    Posted by: RC | Jan 31, 2013 8:07:28 PM

  22. He's a fvcking disgrace.

    Posted by: Pig | Jan 31, 2013 8:28:37 PM

  23. @Geoff - priceless!

    Posted by: bravo | Jan 31, 2013 8:49:03 PM

  24. Behold the intellectual heft of the Republican party. The drooling Ayn Rand fanatic, Donald Trump, Michele Malkin, and now this.

    Posted by: melvin | Jan 31, 2013 8:50:32 PM

  25. Someone should ask the congressman why he thinks he has a right to dictate social behavior at all. If "everybody has a set of beliefs on issues, social issues in particular" then no one person should be allowed to pass social edicts as law. The closet will take it's toll on him and the ugliness inside will destroy any prettiness he has on the outside.

    Posted by: RONTEX | Jan 31, 2013 8:58:59 PM

  26. 1 2 3 »

Post a comment


« «Towleroad Guide to the Tube #1297« «