Ann Coulter | Gay Marriage | News

Ann Coulter Tells Roomful of Booing Students that Gays Can Marry — 'a Person of the Opposite Sex': VIDEO


Ann Coulter was booed by a roomful of Libertarian students from the International Students for Liberty Conference in Washington, D.C. when she brought her uniquely disgusting worldview to a debate with John Stossel.

Asked Stossel: “Why can’t gays get married like straights do?”

Spat Coulter: "Well, they can. They have to marry a member of the opposite sex."

"This is another one where you’re just sucking up to liberals when there are big fights we really need to be having.  Marriage is the most important institution to civilize young people. I want to make divorce a lot more difficult too. Liberals want to destroy the family so that you will have one loyalty - and that is to the government."


Feed This post's comment feed


  1. Why do gay sites keep giving publicity to Ann Coulter and her kind? If a bear farts in a forest, it doesn't matter if someone is there to hear it and report it.

    It doesn't matter. Stop reporting useless crap.

    Posted by: BaoPhac Do | Feb 22, 2013 10:01:18 AM

  2. "I want to make divorce a lot more difficult too."

    The murder rate would skyrocket, you man-faced quim.

    Posted by: Bollux | Feb 22, 2013 10:02:18 AM

  3. i agree with baophac do

    Posted by: capetom | Feb 22, 2013 10:05:12 AM

  4. Why does she look like she has a giraffe for a mother?

    Posted by: Jack M | Feb 22, 2013 10:05:14 AM

  5. There's nothing new here. She's just pandering to her far right base. She's very smart. She knows how to get headlines and those headlines publicize whatever book she's selling. It's long past time we stopped being played.

    Posted by: Houndentenor | Feb 22, 2013 10:12:09 AM

  6. It's great to see her on the defensive on her home turf, at Fox (even though it's Fox Business). She should see the writing all over the walls, but she doesn't. Her party is dying -- rotting from the inside.

    Posted by: joe | Feb 22, 2013 10:16:06 AM

  7. Agreed.

    Towleroad should stop running anything having to do with Coulter, thereby cutting off her media stream, at least on this tributary.

    Why is Andy Towle not listening to his readership, or at least giving us his reasoning behind the continued, helpful PR boost he keeps giving these media whores?

    Posted by: johnny | Feb 22, 2013 10:27:53 AM

  8. Isn't she the darling of the GOProud crowd?

    Posted by: GDad | Feb 22, 2013 10:27:56 AM

  9. @JOHNNY - This blog's point is to generate traffic, thus advertising revenue. As long as people click to view these sorts of articles, comment on them, and discuss them, he'll keep posting them.

    Posted by: joe | Feb 22, 2013 10:29:55 AM

  10. What a vile waste of human flesh

    Posted by: Steve | Feb 22, 2013 10:32:33 AM

  11. Coulter will always have an audience because misery loves company.

    At least she was booed. That doesn't always happen, and it was nice to see. I really wish libertarianism would gain a stronger foothold in our political culture. The time seems right.

    Posted by: Stefan | Feb 22, 2013 10:34:24 AM

  12. She doesn't believe a word she says, but she does laugh all the way to the bank.

    Posted by: Steve Scarborough | Feb 22, 2013 10:40:19 AM

  13. I never understand why anyone gives this wretch a platform to speak, let alone cares even the tiniest bit what she thinks. She's clearly as dim and she is deranged, and, frankly, evil in pretty much any moral system I've ever heard of. She's the poster child for the phrase 'waste of oxygen'.

    Posted by: Tarc | Feb 22, 2013 10:44:13 AM

  14. She is irrelevant.

    Posted by: Betty Treacle | Feb 22, 2013 10:48:50 AM

  15. Anne dear, even conservative or libertarian leaning young people are all growing up with gay friends. So that whole "gays are ruining society" drivel doesn't fly with them. And if you are so clearly wrong on that point it doesn't really make them want to buy into the rest of your crap. I know this is all just an act to keep your name out there and sell books, but your audience is going to eventually disappear.

    Posted by: e.c. | Feb 22, 2013 10:49:48 AM

  16. This just in: Ann Coulter says something hateful and stupid, adjusts testicles. More at 11.

    Posted by: Firestorm | Feb 22, 2013 10:54:32 AM

  17. Oh, why don't you just bugger off, Skeletor?

    Posted by: Rich F. | Feb 22, 2013 10:55:42 AM

  18. Ann Coulter is like anyone else: there is only a slim chance that you will agree with her every position. As others have noted, she is also an entertainer and saleswoman and some of what she says is clearly designed to tweak sensibilities.

    Having said all that, and acknowledging that her position on gay marriage is headupbutt, as a talking head she is one of the better ones. Her facts are usually in order and her grasp of circumstances and dynamics is sharp. This is the woman who told the GOP audience in 2007, "We need to support Chris Christie... because if we don't Romney will get the nomination and we will lose the White House."

    Given a choice between Ann Coulter and Lawrence O'DOnnell, Rachel Maddow, Amy Goodman, etc... on the issues Coulter has the intellectual and patriotic edge.

    Posted by: David Hearne | Feb 22, 2013 10:56:33 AM

  19. Tarc, I don't get it either. To think they paid her to sit there and insult that audience, bringing one young woman close to tears, and then she chuckles about it.

    Posted by: Dastius Krazitauc | Feb 22, 2013 10:57:18 AM

  20. @ BAOPHAC DO :

    "When a bear farts in a forest....."

    ha ha ha , I love it !
    What a great critique of this anorexic bi*ch
    ( with apologies to all decent anorexics).

    Posted by: JackFknTwist | Feb 22, 2013 10:59:02 AM

  21. @STEVE
    I think it's unfair to call her a 'waste of human flesh' since there's clearly no meat on her. She is, however, a spectacular waste of bone marrow.

    Posted by: Gareth | Feb 22, 2013 11:01:46 AM

  22. @ David Hearne :

    You're comparing the intellectual abilities of Coulter with Rachel Maddow ?

    Seriously ?

    Posted by: JackFknTwist | Feb 22, 2013 11:01:59 AM

  23. @ E C

    Both the libertarian male speaker and Coulter were correct: the government should not be involved in marriage and that's not going to happen.

    Marriage is property law. The purpose of marriage is indeed as many opponents to same sex marriage have said though not in these words: to co-obligate a male and female to the construction of a child rearing family. The counter to that argument is that we don't require a couple to have children to remain married or even to have the intent of having children which is why there is an equal rights issue for gay people.

    Having said all of that, getting married to your same sex partner is probably not a good economic strategy unless you intend to play house with a stay at home mom and a white picket fence. Having a life and financial partner that is a legal stranger allows you to do some things (like strategic bankruptcy) in ways that married couples can't get away with.

    Posted by: David Hearne | Feb 22, 2013 11:04:12 AM

  24. Its good to know what your enemies think. To be aware of people like this.

    Posted by: Tom in Long Beach | Feb 22, 2013 11:04:58 AM

  25. Who cares what Skeletor says?

    Posted by: Ken | Feb 22, 2013 11:05:49 AM

  26. 1 2 3 »

Post a comment


« «Oscar Pistorius to be Granted Bail Awaiting Trial on Murder Charges« «