DOMA | Michelle Obama | News | Republican Party | Supreme Court

Michele Bachmann, Anti-Gay GOP Congressmen Attack Supreme Court Marriage Ruling: VIDEO


In case you missed it, following yesterday's Supreme Court ruling, Rep. Michele Bachmann and other members of Congress' Anti-Gay Hall of Fame held a press conference to attack SCOTUS for striking down DOMA.

Check out the vitriol, AFTER THE JUMP...

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. These nuts just prove that the Supreme Court's majority got it right when they said that the motivation for DOMA was to disparage and injure gay people. That's exactly what these nuts want to do.

    Posted by: Kelly in AC | Jun 27, 2013 1:45:53 PM

  2. The stupidity is profound and intractable. One example, one of these idiots quotes Solomon. He seems to forget that Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines.

    Posted by: Neil | Jun 27, 2013 1:58:49 PM

  3. One of those with so much hate.

    Posted by: Matt26 | Jun 27, 2013 1:59:10 PM


    Posted by: Fancy | Jun 27, 2013 2:02:51 PM

  5. Do the Bachmann's have kids??

    Posted by: JimmyD | Jun 27, 2013 2:08:00 PM

  6. I believe the correct response to their whining is, "suck my balls."

    Posted by: Tre | Jun 27, 2013 2:08:50 PM


    Posted by: Albert | Jun 27, 2013 2:18:51 PM

  8. Who Cares?

    (thanks Nancy.)

    Posted by: johnny | Jun 27, 2013 2:25:27 PM

  9. The Bachmann's have no biological kids, but have adopted several.

    All the arguments against gay marriage are essentially non-sequiturs.

    An iron-clad rule in politics is the flimsier the rationale, the more contempt there is behind it. It's a real "you don't matter to me" attitude.

    Posted by: anon | Jun 27, 2013 2:35:07 PM

  10. Be gone, witch, before someone drops a house on you!

    Posted by: Mark Alexander | Jun 27, 2013 2:37:08 PM

  11. They did not seem to mind when these "unelected judges" gave George W Bush the win over Gore when the popular vote did not.

    Posted by: Lee | Jun 27, 2013 2:51:15 PM

  12. Who cares. Go away.

    Posted by: Rad | Jun 27, 2013 3:00:07 PM

  13. Bachman's comments are final proof positive--but was any more needed?--that she's been sniffin' too much model airplane glue . . .

    Posted by: Joe the Cynic | Jun 27, 2013 3:03:34 PM

  14. Sour frustrated miserable.

    What a sad testimony to their shallow hate filled lives.

    Posted by: JackFknTwist | Jun 27, 2013 3:42:15 PM

  15. She sounds more like a minister than an elected representative. Someone should tell her: maybe she's lost.

    Posted by: Munro | Jun 27, 2013 3:56:13 PM

  16. Who cares??

    Posted by: Cecilfirefox | Jun 27, 2013 4:00:56 PM

  17. When will some true journalist reporter have the guts to ask her, in a live news conference, to justify ... in detail ... how she can invoke God in defense of her version of the constitution when that very constitution calls for separation of church and state? And then, when she babbles on trying to dodge the question, keep asking follow-on questions until she finally admits she is wrong.

    Posted by: Bob | Jun 27, 2013 4:14:38 PM

  18. Who cares!

    Posted by: FunMe | Jun 27, 2013 4:18:39 PM

  19. Who cares

    Posted by: Sargon Bighorn | Jun 27, 2013 5:42:55 PM

  20. Michele Bachmann, of all people, should support the right of gay people to marry, after all: SHE MARRIED ONE! If you don't believe that, call in a gaydar technician, because your gaydar is badly in need of repair.

    Posted by: andrew | Jun 27, 2013 5:59:20 PM

  21. misha, that's what Nancy Pelosi said.

    Video of her whole statement, and also Mark Takano, gay rep from Southern CA:

    Posted by: emjayay | Jun 27, 2013 11:34:16 PM

  22. Michele said "The people are more important than the Supreme Court." OK, lets ask the people about gay marriage. Oh wait, Gallup has been asking for years. Popular opinion went majority pro several years ago according to multiple polls, and 65% pro in the 18-29 years old segment.

    Also, I don't remember God inventing marriage.

    Posted by: emjayay | Jun 28, 2013 12:01:44 AM

  23. « 1 2

Post a comment


« «Frank Bidart's 'Metaphysical Dog': Book Review« «