Federal Judge Denies Request for Stay of Ruling Striking Down Idaho's Gay Marriage Ban

A federal judge has denied Idaho's request for a stay of last night's ruling striking down the state's gay marriage ban, the AP reports:

DaleU.S. District Magistrate Judge Candy Dale wrote Wednesday morning that Gov. C.L. "Butch" Otter's appeal isn't likely to succeed, and so there's no reason to keep same-sex couples from seeking marriage licenses or marrying on Friday.

On Tuesday, Dale struck down Idaho's same-sex marriage ban in response to a lawsuit from four Idaho couples.
Dale said Idaho's law unconstitutionally denies gay and lesbian couples their fundamental right to marry and wrongly stigmatizes their families.

She said the state must start issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples Friday morning.

The state must now appeal to the Ninth Circuit for a stay request...

Feed This post's comment feed


  1. Haha haters!

    Posted by: SpaceCadet | May 14, 2014 2:02:57 PM

  2. So, I googled Gov. Butch Otter because I figured with a name like that, he has to bee good. Well, let me tell you, I was severely disappointed.

    Posted by: John in Houston | May 14, 2014 2:33:06 PM

  3. If they have to appeal to the Ninth circuit, then wouldn't that be denied automatically since the 9th Circuit already ruled on this exact same case in California?

    Posted by: Richard Harney | May 14, 2014 3:20:57 PM

  4. I don't understand why all these judges have issued stays after ruling in favor of marriage equality. I'm glad she didn't

    Posted by: Grover Underwood | May 14, 2014 4:05:59 PM

  5. Good luck with the 9th Circuit bigots!

    Posted by: TheSeer | May 14, 2014 4:18:19 PM

  6. If Idaho appeals to the Supreme Court, it is likely it will issue a stay just as they did in the Utah case. Sooner or later, they have to weigh in to resolve the mess and determine the constitutionality of those bans.

    Posted by: simon | May 14, 2014 6:33:05 PM

  7. @ Richard Harney

    1) The California case was not the same, because they had already granted same-sex "marriages" and even before that, granted same-sex couples pretty much all the (state) trappings of marriage.
    2) The 9th Circuit's decision in that case was vacated by the Supreme Court, so is of no effect now.
    3) The 9th Circuit stayed that decision, and lifted the stay only after California officials indicated they did not want the stay to continue.

    Posted by: TKinSC | May 14, 2014 6:58:43 PM

  8. FRIDAY MORNING !!! .. Here we go again! .. lol!

    Posted by: Retro | May 15, 2014 12:50:39 AM

Post a comment


« «Federal Judge Denies NOM's Attempts to Intervene in Challenge to Oregon's Gay Marriage Ban« «