• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Travel
  • Sports
  • Law/Justice
  • Celebrities
  • Republicans
  • Madonna
  • Books
  • Men
  • Trans Rights
  • Royals
  • Monkeypox
  • Sophia Bush’s girlfriend ‘proud’ the actress has opened up about coming out as queer
  • Mel B declares she’ll ‘always be open’ when it comes to her sexuality!
  • Megan Thee Stallion being sued for ‘forcing cameraman watch her having lesbian sex!’

The “Gay” Marriage Misdirection: Justice Alito Gets It Wrong in Windsor

Ari Ezra Waldman July 24, 2013

By BRIAN CHELCUN and ARI EZRA WALDMAN

I am pleased to welcome guest columnist, Brian Chelcun, a graduate of N.Y.U. Law School and a friend, who both conceived of and principally drafted today's installment of "What's Next." Towleroad is honored to have the benefit of his keen insight. The "What's Next" series takes an in depth look at marriage and gay rights, in general, after the Supreme Court's momentous rulings striking down the Defense of Marriage Act and Prop 8. Today's column looks at Justice Alito's dissenting opinion in Windsor.

1299099052136Back in March, when the Supreme Court heard oral argument Windsorv. United States, the media — Towleroad included — quickly jumped on aprovocative question posed by Justice Samuel Alito:  

"Traditionalmarriage has been around for thousands of years. Same-sex marriage is very new…[You] want us to step in and render a decision based on an assessment of theeffects of this institution which is newer than cell phones or the Internet?"

Last week we discussed Justice Scalia's dissent, a sloppy, berating conceit lambasting what he perceived as judicial activism and warning (again)about the impending extension of marriage equality across the country. Justice Alito's dissent is a little different: it's a little less bombastic and focuses mainly on the "newness" of theinstitution of same-sex marriage. But, like Justice Scalia's, Justice Alito's dissent doesn't stand up to scrutiny.

He repeatedly invokes the phrase "same-sex marriage," a term that is often used as shorthand for marriage equality. It seems innocuous enough, and many advocates have probably used it in conversation to avoid more tongue-twisting phrases such as "marriage for same-sex couples." So why is Alito wrong to use it (over, and over, in his dissent), and why should we avoid it as well?

Continue reading AFTER THE JUMP to see how Justice Alito's assessment of "same-sex marriage" is flawed, anddoesn't appreciate what Windsor v. UnitedStates and the marriage equality battle are really about. His dissent serves as atimely reminder to those of us who are continuing the fight to expand marriageequality about how important the phrasing of a few words like "same-sexmarriage" can be.

110427_judge_vaughn_walker_605InJudge Vaughn Walker's opinion in the first round of the Perry litigation, the case that overturned Proposition 8 inCalifornia, he described what the two same-sex couples in that case were seeking assomething that was not new or different, but rather what opposite-sex couplesalready have –- recognition of their relationships "for what they are: marriages."

By contrast, Justice Alito sees "traditional" marriage, which is "intrinsically opposite-sex," as afundamentally different institution from "consent-based" marriage, whichincludes "same-sex marriage." The rightto marriage, he suggests, may be worthy of constitutional protection, or inSupreme Court jargon, a "fundamental right … deeply rooted in this Nation'shistory and traditions." But, he ultimately concludes, "itis beyond dispute that the right to same-sex marriage is not deeply rooted inthis Nation's history and tradition." Therefore, he argues, Edie Windsor was seeking a "very newright" that unelected judges should resist recognizing in deference to thelegislative will of the people.

Thisdistinction between opposite-sex and same-sex marriage is artificial and wrong,and harmful to the marriage equality movement. It matters not just in public opinion, where opponents use "gaymarriage" instead of "same-sex marriage" as a derogatory expression ofinequality, an implication that same-sex couples' marriages are different from those of opposite-sex couples.  It also mattersin the legal world, as Justice Alito's passage demonstrates.

Abrief Supreme Court primer: when the Court views a right as fundamental to ourindividual liberties, it will closely scrutinize any law that interferes withthat right. Recall our earlier discussions of levels of scrutiny as akin to hurdles on a racetrack: the higher the hurdle, the harder to jump over; the higher the level of scrutiny, the harder it will be for a law to pass constitutional muster. So, the Court is far morelikely to strike down a law interfering with a fundamental right, for examplethe right to use contraception, than if a law interferes with a non-fundamentalright, for example a right to smoke marijuana.

When (not if) a marriage equality case returns to the Court to decide ifstates like Texas or Alabama are constitutionally required to allow same-sex couples to marry, it may turn onwhether those states can come up with compelling reasons for their laws; ifmarriage equality is considered a fundamental right, the states' reasons willhave to be far more compelling, and they will be unlikely to succeed.

TheSupreme Court decides whether or not there is a "fundamental right" protected by the constitution by looking to "historyand tradition," as Justice Alito referenced in his dissent, to see if societyhas generally protected that right. Andhere is where the distinction between "marriage" and "same-sex marriage" becomes crucial.  

Underthis framework, Justice Alito looked specifically at a right to "same-sexmarriage" as the appropriate analysis in Windsor,rather than a general right to "marriage." Of course the problem is that Alito is correct when he frames the case in this narrow way — there is in fact a long history of protecting marriage (including severalprior Supreme Court cases), but only a modest and recent tradition of "same-sexmarriage." Indeed, newer than cellphones or the internet! Thus, there could be no fundamental right for same-sex couples tosame-sex marry under Justice Alito's approach. 

That'sthe doctrine in legalese, but we don't think it takes a lawyer to see, or atleast feel, that there's something deeply wrong with this approach. By examining the right to marry as "same-sexmarriage," Justice Alito looked to our history and traditions not only todetermine what right Edie Windsor wasasserting (the right to marriage) but also whogets to exercise it (only opposite-sex couples). Simplyput, that's not how fundamental rights should work. If there is a history and tradition ofdiscrimination against someone, denying a group their ability to exercise afundamental right, the Court is supposed to rectify that, not ratify it; but byconsidering both what and who, Justice Alito would say thatdecades of discrimination against same-sex couples are part of our history andtradition, and should thus continue.

This is precisely what the majority did in Bowers v. Hardwick, the infamous case allowed states to criminalize same-sex sodomy: instead of recognizing that what was at issue in the case was the liberty of gay persons to express themselves intimately, a right shared by heterosexuals and gays alike, the majority framed the debate as one of whether the Constitution protected a fundamental right to "same-sex sodomy." Did the Constitution give us a right to gay sex? Of course not, when framed in those terms. The Bowers Court defined fundamental rights based on what right was being asserted and who was asserting it, thus perpetuating the discrimination embodied in anti-sodomy laws.

Our-marriage2Justice Alito is, quite simply, wrong. Once a right is fundamental, it is presumed fundamental for everyone. It didn't matter that there was nodeep-rooted history of "interracial marriage" in 1967; the Supreme Court heldin Loving v. Virginia that Virginia'santimiscegenation law violated a right to "marriage." And it's irrelevant now that there's notradition of "same-sex marriage" in 2013 because, as Judge Walker noted, thisisn't about the who but about the what. What's at stake is marriage. Historically, same-sex couples have been discriminated against and notallowed to marry.  The Court cannot invokethat history of discrimination to say that there is no history of a right tosame-sex marriage!

All of this hinges on a fewkey words, and whether the subject of the marriage equality battle is phrasedin a way that makes our rights different — "same-sex marriage" — or equal — "marriage." Justice Alito should havebeen more careful in his analysis, and his dissent serves a reminder to us allthat words matter in public debate and in legal analysis. So the next time you catch yourself saying "same-sex marriage," try to use something like "marriage equality" or "marriagefor same-sex couples" or simply "marriage" instead. Because while same-sex couples' ability tomarry is indeed a more recent development than cell phones or the iInternet,our right to marry is just asdeeply rooted in the constitutional principles of equality as everyone else's.

***

Follow me on Twitter: @ariezrawaldman

Ari Ezra Waldman is the Associate Director of the Institute for Information Law and Policy and a professor at New York Law School and is concurrently getting his PhD at Columbia University in New York City. He is a 2002 graduate of Harvard College and a 2005 graduate of Harvard Law School. Ari writes weekly posts on law and various LGBT issues.

Brian Chelcun is a 2013 graduate of New York University Law School. This column comes largely from a symposium piece he published in the N.Y.U. Review of Law and Social Change.

Topics: History, News, Society More Posts About: Ari Ezra Waldman, DOMA, DOMA, gay marriage, Law - Gay, LGBT, News, proposition 8, Samuel Alito

Related Posts
  • U.S. Supreme Court protects police from ‘Miranda’ lawsuits
  • Michigan judge blocks enforcement of state’s pre-Roe v. Wade abortion ban
  • Protesters Dressed As ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ Gather Outside Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s Home Ahead Of Roe v. Wade Vote
  • Mel B declares she’ll ‘always be open’ when it comes to her sexuality!

    Mel B declares she’ll ‘always be open’ when it comes to her sexuality!

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Mel B will “always be open” when it comes to her sexuality. The Spice Girls singer, 48, who reunited with her bandmates including the group's ex-singer Victoria Beckham for the fashion …Read More »
  • Megan Thee Stallion being sued for ‘forcing cameraman watch her having lesbian sex!’

    Megan Thee Stallion being sued for ‘forcing cameraman watch her having lesbian sex!’

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Megan Thee Stallion is being sued for allegedly creating a hostile work environment and forcing her cameraman to watch her having lesbian sex. The 29-year-old ‘Savage' rapper faces the salacious claims …Read More »
  • Mean Girls star Jonathan Bennett recalls the moment his life ‘changed forever’

    Mean Girls star Jonathan Bennett recalls the moment his life ‘changed forever’

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Jonathan Bennett's life was “changed forever” by his role in ‘Mean Girls'. The 42-year-old actor starred as heartthrob Aaron Samuels in the 2004 cult classic – which followed Lindsay Lohan, Rachel …Read More »
  • Sir Elton John sent Lance Bass gift basket to celebrate coming out

    Sir Elton John sent Lance Bass gift basket to celebrate coming out

    Published by BANG Showbiz English Sir Elton John sent Lance Bass a gift basket after he came out as gay. The 44-year-old NSYNC star revealed the legendary singer showed his support when Lance decided to reveal …Read More »
Previous Post: « Ballot Proposal To Overturn Florida’s Ban On Gay Marriage Unlikely To Appear In The Near Future
Next Post: Seattle’s Highest Skyscraper Blocks Gay Sites Like Joe. My. God, It Gets Better, and Towleroad »

Primary Sidebar

Most Recent

  • Sophia Bush’s girlfriend ‘proud’ the actress has opened up about coming out as queer

    Sophia Bush’s girlfriend ‘proud’ the actress has opened up about coming out as queer

  • Mel B declares she’ll ‘always be open’ when it comes to her sexuality!

    Mel B declares she’ll ‘always be open’ when it comes to her sexuality!

  • Megan Thee Stallion being sued for ‘forcing cameraman watch her having lesbian sex!’

    Megan Thee Stallion being sued for ‘forcing cameraman watch her having lesbian sex!’

  • Mean Girls star Jonathan Bennett recalls the moment his life ‘changed forever’

    Mean Girls star Jonathan Bennett recalls the moment his life ‘changed forever’

  • Sir Elton John sent Lance Bass gift basket to celebrate coming out

    Sir Elton John sent Lance Bass gift basket to celebrate coming out

  • Relationship status influences heterosexual women’s sexual prejudice towards lesbians

    Relationship status influences heterosexual women’s sexual prejudice towards lesbians

  • JoJo Siwa had a challenge transitioning to new grown-up image

    JoJo Siwa had a challenge transitioning to new grown-up image

  • Liz Hurley defends lesbian sex scene in new movie that was directed by her son

    Liz Hurley defends lesbian sex scene in new movie that was directed by her son

Partner Links

  • Morning Man Classic: Ricky Nelson!
    Ricky Nelson, one of the best looking men and most talented […]
  • Intel Chief Gabbard Failed Basic Cybersecurity Protocol For Years
    Once again, Wired did the digging and got the scoop about […]
  • On the Rag, Vol. 856
     This week's rag 'n' mag roundup features Sergio Fernandez, Kevin Fernandez, […]
  • Our Favorite Good News Story Of The Day: Do You Have A Flag?
    To work around the fuckery of the anti-DEI hysteria, in response […]
  • King Charles has left Princess Diana’s childhood home, Park House, to disrepair & rot
    For the first years of Princess Diana’s life, her father was […]

Most Commented

Social

Twitter @tlrd | Facebook | Instagram @tlrd

About

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy
[towleroadmr] [towleroadtn]

Footer

Ptown Hacks 2018

Read

  • Travel
  • Film
  • Law – LGBT Rights
  • Columns
  • Specials

About

  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2025 · Log in

×
×