The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled 7-2 in favor of anti-gay baker Jack Phillips in Masterpiece Cakeshop vs. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, with Justice Elena Kagan concurring. Justices Ginsburg and Sotomayor dissented.
This is a developing story (refresh for updates)…
Read the ruling HERE. We'll have some analysis from our legal editor Ari Ezra Waldman coming up. Check in
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote, in the court's opinion, that “consideration” of Phillips' case was compromised by the Civil Rights Commission “which showed elements of a clear and impermissible hostility toward the sincere religious beliefs motivating his objection.”
He added: “As the record shows, some of the commissioners at the Commission's formal, public hearings endorsed the view that religious beliefs cannot legitimately be carried into the public sphere or commercial domain, disparaged Phillips' faith as despicable and characterized it as merely rhetorical, and compared his invocation of his sincerely held religious beliefs to defenses of slavery and the Holocaust. No commissioners objected to the comments. Nor were they mentioned in the later state-court ruling or disavowed in the briefs filed here. The comments thus cast doubt on the fairness and impartiality of the Commission's adjudication of Phillips' case.”
But the Court, while ruling on the specifics of Phillips' case, failed to rule on the broad issue of discrimination.
Added Kennedy: “The outcome of cases like this in other circumstances must await further elaboration in the courts, all in the context of recognizing that these disputes must be resolved with tolerance, without undue disrespect to sincere religious beliefs, and without subjecting gay persons to indignities when they seek goods and services in an open market.”
Writes Amy Howe at SCOTUSblog: “Short answer is that the baker wins for now, because the order against him was set aside because he didn't get a ‘neutral decisionmaker who would give full and fair consideration to his religious objection.'”
On background, in July 2012, David Mullins and Charlie Craig went to Denver's Masterpiece Cake Shop, owned by Phillips, looking for a cake to celebrate the couple's upcoming nuptials.
Phillips denied the couple's request and later admitted he had turned away other same-sex couples as a matter of policy.
Mullins and Craig filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission under the state's public accommodations law, the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act, which covers sexual orientation, which led to a lawsuit, won by the couple in 2013.
The Colorado Civil Rights Commission's decision noted evidence in the record that Phillips had expressed willingness to take a cake order for the “marriage” of two dogs, but not for the commitment ceremony of two women, and that he would not make a cake for a same-sex couple's wedding celebration “just as he would not be willing to make a pedophile cake.”
Phillips and his lawyers, the ultraconservative anti-gay legal group Alliance Defending Freedom, have been appealing the ruling since, and losing each time, which is why it ultimately reached SCOTUS.
Some reactions to the ruling:
From the ACLU:
The Supreme Court today reaffirmed the core principle that businesses open to the public must be open to all in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The court did not accept arguments that would have turned back the clock on equality by making our basic civil rights protections unenforceable, but reversed this case based on concerns specific to the facts here. The American Civil Liberties Union argued the case on behalf of Charlie Craig and David Mullins, who were refused service at a Colorado bakery because they are a same-sex couple.
In 2012, Mullins and Craig visited the Masterpiece Cakeshop to order a cake for their wedding. After the bakery turned the would-be customers away because they were a same-sex couple, Mullins and Craig filed a complaint with the Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The commission found that the bakery had discriminated against the couple in violation of Colorado law, a decision the Colorado courts upheld. The Supreme Court today found that members of the Commission had made statements evidencing anti-religious bias, and thus had not given a fair consideration to the bakery's claims.
“The court reversed the Masterpiece Cakeshop decision based on concerns unique to the case but reaffirmed its longstanding rule that states can prevent the harms of discrimination in the marketplace, including against LGBT people.” said Louise Melling, deputy legal director of the ACLU.
We're going to see years of needless, hurtful litigation by those seeking to evade responsibility for discriminating against members of our community.
— Lambda Legal (@LambdaLegal) June 4, 2018
#SCOTUS has become an accomplice in the right's strategy to hollow out one of its finest achievements, the right to equal marriage, and create what Justice Ginsberg memorably termed "skim milk marriages." #LGBTQ #MasterpieceCakeshop #OpenToAll
— Lambda Legal (@LambdaLegal) June 4, 2018
omg. The ruling on the merits was narrow. The vote tally itself wasn't. This isn't hard!
— Sam Stein (@samstein) June 4, 2018
BREAKING — #SCOTUS issues devasting Masterpiece Cakeshop decision. Justice Kennedy issues ruling finding that baker's refusal to serve couple was based on 'sincerely held religious beliefs.' Gravely unfortunate ruling for those who believe in equality in our country. #OpenToAll
— Kristen Clarke (@KristenClarkeJD) June 4, 2018
SCOTUS has essentially ruled that LGBTQ people can be denied all basic services on religious grounds – Ivanka will soon post a photo of herself laughing with delight#SCOTUS
— Paul Rudnick (@PaulRudnickNY) June 4, 2018
#SCOTUS didn't resolve the hardest First Am. issues posed by Masterpiece Cakeshop. Instead, it pointed out that they're hard and then ruled that the baker didn't get a fair process from the state. pic.twitter.com/ypDaDy4iu9
— Brad Heath (@bradheath) June 4, 2018
BREAKING: SCOTUS reversed the decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, based on concerns specific to the case.
The Court did NOT rule that the Constitution gives a right to discriminate.
— ACLU (@ACLU) June 4, 2018
SCOTUS ruled 7-2 for this baker (and the treatment by Colorado Civil rights Commission), but punted on the law itself. Per USA Today. pic.twitter.com/DZs79U9L2s
— Michelangelo Signorile (@MSignorile) June 4, 2018
Thus, there will be many more cases, as this is completely unresolved by Supreme Court. We will still see discrimination, and still fight in the courts and back to SCOTUS. Nonetheless, this decision is itself deeply flawed.
— Michelangelo Signorile (@MSignorile) June 4, 2018
The Supreme Court issues a narrow ruling today in #MasterpieceCakeshop that does NOT create a license to discriminate against the #LGBTQ Community. https://t.co/NMFaCPKQ90
— NCLR – National Center for Lesbian Rights (@NCLRights) June 4, 2018