04/07/2006
Breaking Gay Duck News
For the third year in a row, a pair of male ducks (not necessarily the ones pictured above) have returned to a park in Sweden, and from all appearances, look like partners for life: "Far from the torments of bird flu and temptations of the opposite sex, the two common shelducks appear only to have eyes for each other -- in a sort of ducky gay marriage."
As soon as this was discovered, the International Duck Council immediately introduced legislation to define duck marriage as between a male and a female.
Sphere: Related ContentPosted 5:15 PM EST by Andy in Nature | Permalink
Comments
Andy, this site gets better and better... thanks
Posted by: Mike p | Apr 7, 2006 5:20:02 PM
Daffy and Donald.
Posted by: David | Apr 7, 2006 5:22:31 PM
A conversative student of psychiatry had this to say: "They're quackers."
Posted by: Rob (lrdarystar) | Apr 7, 2006 5:35:44 PM
>> "a pair of male ducks (not necessarily >> the ones pictured above)"
All photographs are posed for by professional models except as otherwise noted. Neither said photographs, nor the editorial matter nor quotations accompanying such photographs are to be construed as indicative of that duck's sexual orientation, conduck(t), personality or actual quotation (eg."Quack")
Posted by: David | Apr 7, 2006 5:37:26 PM
Well, if they walk like ducks, look like ducks, and quack like ducks, then it should follow that they're both "patos."
Posted by: Mike V. | Apr 7, 2006 6:02:36 PM
Now everyone knows my partners name.
Posted by: Donald | Apr 7, 2006 6:35:02 PM
Penguins, flamingos, now these two. It`s a bird world of love.
They`ll be calling bird flu avian AIDS next to try and stop this new movement of same-sex love.
Posted by: Peter Rivendell | Apr 7, 2006 6:39:27 PM
funny....andy.
Posted by: richard | Apr 7, 2006 7:07:14 PM
Early homophobic response was clear. Your parents, warning of impending danger, always yelled " DUCK ".
Now, we know what they meant......
Posted by: Raymond | Apr 7, 2006 8:37:13 PM
Is the use of the word "ducky" in this context meant homophobically?
Posted by: Peter Rivendell | Apr 7, 2006 9:19:40 PM
How clever many of us are as wordsmiths. LOL
Posted by: Raymond | Apr 8, 2006 4:15:22 AM
Mine wasn't clever. It was wicked weak.
But to the rest, Bravo!
Posted by: Rob (lrdarystar) | Apr 8, 2006 12:16:52 PM
Recent Comments