All of those "Santorum Surges" headlines make sense now.
Posted by: Lee | Jan 4, 2012 10:22:33 AM
Sorry, never understood his appeal.
Posted by: Matt26 | Jan 4, 2012 10:26:40 AM
No gender confusion or gender non-conformity there, is there?
Posted by: Rick | Jan 4, 2012 10:40:33 AM
Well that should sell some knickers in the gay men's community.
Posted by: Peter | Jan 4, 2012 10:46:08 AM
Why, oh, why, did they insist on airbrushing all the detail out of his bulge? At least, I hope it's been airbrushed out!
Posted by: RedOnTheGreg | Jan 4, 2012 10:59:04 AM
@ redonthegreg - I think he may have been 'enhanced'. Sexy man, nonetheless!
Posted by: Married in MA | Jan 4, 2012 11:02:08 AM
These images of him are sort of like Britney VMA disaster for me. I can't stop looking, but at the end of the day you've got to accept some things are not what they used to be. She should have left her corset on....
Also, I totally agree about the tats. Enough. bleh.
He's getting too old for those close-up shots of his face. He still looks good from a distance, though.
Posted by: Joe | Jan 4, 2012 11:38:30 AM
They didn't do a ton to these images, i know because I watched my partner and his co-workers retouch these. They spent hours staring at Beckham's junk LOL just shaping it a little, the guy has big balls...LOL
Posted by: matt | Jan 4, 2012 11:45:01 AM
"the guy has big balls"
Translation: all beans, no frank! I've had a few of those! LOL
Posted by: Luke | Jan 4, 2012 12:12:15 PM
"Is that a gun in your pocket or are you just glad to see me?"
Posted by: greg | Jan 4, 2012 12:46:54 PM
He's tats are GROSS. Too bad, I used to think he was a handsome guy.
Posted by: FunMe | Jan 4, 2012 1:17:18 PM
He's generally not my type, but this doesn't hurt the eye any, either. :-)