Federal Judge Recuses Himself from Case Challenging South Carolina Ban on Gay Marriage

Southcarolina

A federal judge has recused himself from a case challenging South Carolina's ban on same-sex marriage. The case was filed in September by state trooper Katherine Bradacs and Tracie Goodwin and their attorney, John Nichols.

The State reports: Anderson

Federal Judge Joe Anderson of Columbia said he recused himself, because as a member of the executive board of the Indian Waters Council of the Boy Scouts of America – which covers five Midlands counties – he recently took a position in Scout discussions over whether local Scouts should admit gay Scouts and have gay Scout leaders.

“I voted for the national policy, which at present is to admit gay Boy Scouts but not have gay Scout leaders,” Anderson said. “It was very controversial, and we lost some churches that sponsor us because of it.”

Also, Anderson said, one of the plaintiffs in the case is a Scout leader in Kershaw County, and earlier this year, she brought her partner to a Scout meeting.

“That caused some parents to protest, and they brought their complaint to the Scout board that I’m on,” Anderson said. “We had to remove her as a Scoutmaster.”

Anderson said he came to the decision to recuse himself on his own, and it was not the result of protest by anyone:

“I still think I could have been fair,” Anderson said, “but the test for recusal is could somebody have reasonably questioned whether you were impartial going into the case, and I felt that was the reason I needed to step aside.”

The new judge is U.S. Judge Michelle Childs, an appointee of President Barack Obama.

More at The State...

Feed This post's comment feed

Comments

  1. So nice of the as*hole to reveal personal, confidential information about the woman's removal from the scout leader position, not to mention the act of actually removing her. It's a good thing he stepped aside. It's quite clear how Mr. Fairpants would have ruled.

    Posted by: NotSafeForWork | Nov 15, 2013 11:34:02 AM


  2. Well, at least we have an Obama appointee now, so that should help our chances. Of course, whatever happens here in South Carolina will be appealed.

    Posted by: Francis #1 | Nov 15, 2013 11:41:37 AM


  3. Someone's pants are on fire....

    Posted by: Ankerich | Nov 15, 2013 12:24:45 PM


  4. I actually appreciate that this judge had the jurisprudence to recuse himself.

    Posted by: danielw | Nov 15, 2013 1:37:18 PM


  5. He did the right thing. Scalia & Thomas could take lessons.

    This family is so appealing. Beautiful ladies, beautiful babies, handsome son.
    That picture makes me want to get to know them.

    Posted by: SERIOUSLY | Nov 15, 2013 1:41:13 PM


  6. I don't think you could have been fair at all and you were right to recuse yourself. You're homophobic and you know it. You should be allowed to be a judge and should be removed from the bench.

    Posted by: Mike Ryan | Nov 15, 2013 2:28:54 PM


  7. I went into this story assuming he would be a big jerk, but his comments as quoted here were very measured, and he made the right decision about recusal. I bet the plaintiffs agree with that, and they probably would have moved for recusal if he had not done it voluntarily. At least he voted to allow gay scouts, which I'm sure a lot of South Carolinians did not do. And they do look like a lovely family.

    Posted by: Patrick | Nov 15, 2013 3:42:29 PM


Post a comment







Trending


« «Far-Right Demonstrators Torch 'Gay Rights' Rainbow in Warsaw Public Square: VIDEO« «