• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Travel
  • Sports
  • Law/Justice
  • Celebrities
  • Film/TV/Stream
  • Republicans
  • Madonna
  • Books
  • Men
  • Trans Rights
  • Tech/Science
  • Royals
  • Monkeypox
  • Mark Zeigler: Brittney Griner has trade value a teacher does not
  • Torn Apart: Lachlan Murdoch Tells Pals If ‘Trump Were To Run Again, It’d Be Bad’ — As ‘FOX News’ Patriach Rupert Thinks ‘He’s Good For Business’
  • Herschel Walker’s Ex-Wife Says Former NFL Star ‘Threatened To Kill Her’ In New Senate Campaign Ad

The ‘Masterpiece Cakeshop’ Case Isn’t About Cake: What To Expect at the Supreme Court

Ari Ezra Waldman December 5, 2017 Leave a Comment

Jack Phillips Masterpiece cake shop

Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. Masterpiece Cakeshop is one of a number of recent cases in which owners of small businesses open to the public–florists, bakers, decorators, or caterers, for example–have refused service to gay couples on the grounds that same-sex marriage violates the business owners’ religious beliefs.

It is a major civil rights case, with implications far beyond cake, the LGBTQ community, and same-sex marriage. Allowing individuals to use religion (or free speech, more on that in a minute) as an excuse for noncompliance with nondiscrimination laws opens an enormous donut hole in equality, threatening a new version of segregated lunch counters and second class citizenship.

READ THIS TOO: Masterpiece Cakeshop v Colorado: A License to Discriminate with Echoes to the Past

What follows is a brief introduction to some of the legal questions at issue in Masterpiece Cakeshop.

Towleroad will follow up with summaries of the arguments and more analysis in the coming days.

What Happened?

In 2012, two gay men, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, visited a bakery, Masterpiece Cakeshop, in the greater Denver area. Colorado still didn’t allow openly gay persons to marry, but the couple planned to marry in an equality state and celebrate among their friends and family back home. Jack Phillips, the owner of Masterpiece, refused to do business with them, citing his religious beliefs. “I am a Christian,” he said, “and I don’t believe in same-sex marriage.” Notably, as we learned from various court filings, Mr. Phillips doesn’t design any cakes that conflict with particular interpretation of religious scripture: his cakes do not contain alcohol, he won’t design a Halloween cake, and he once refused to design a cake to celebrate a divorce. He referred Charlie and David to another bakery.

The Case

Charlie and David approached the Colorado Civil Rights Commission, the state agency that, among other things, allows individuals who have been discriminated against to enforce their rights under Colorado’s public accommodations law. That law prohibits businesses that are open to the public, like Masterpiece, from discriminating on the basis of race, religion, ethnicity, country of origin, and sexual orientation. Charlie and David filed a claim with the Commission against Masterpiece for violating that law: Masterpiece had refused to serve a gay couple specifically because they are gay. That is black-letter discrimination of a protected group. The Commission, and then every Colorado state court after that, sided with Charlie and David.

The Issues

Masterpiece Cakeshop is a pivotal case. The briefs from the parties involved are just two among hundreds of amici (or “friends of the court”) who are interested in the outcome. Notably, the Trump Administration has gotten involved on the side of the baker.

Phillips and Masterpiece make an argument that we’ve seen before, especially if you followed Towleroad’s coverage of same-sex marriage cases. Colorado’s public accommodations law is unconstitutional, Masterpiece argues, because, as a law that impinges on fundamental liberties like the free exercise of religion and free speech, it has to pass so-called strict scrutiny. Strict scrutiny looks at laws with an exacting eye, requiring the state to have a compelling interest to act and to have a law that is narrowly tailored to meet that objective. Masterpiece argues that public accommodations laws fail that test. The state cannot have so compelling an interest as to (a) force a deeply religious man to violate his beliefs to make a cake (the free exercise of religion part), or (b) force an artist to express himself against his will (the free speech part).

There are too many problems with this argument to list in one post. But I’ll try.

I have no doubt that artistry goes into the making of a cake. Indeed, Masterpiece cakes, like many specialty cakes out there, are beautiful. But cakes aren’t speech; if they are, everything is. An amicus brief filed on behalf of a group of bakers argues as much. Although it is true that the First Amendment protects expression beyond words, cakes do not express the baker’s artistic expression. They are, as the bakers argue, meant to be eaten, not enjoyed as art.

Plus, no reasonable person could look at this situation and think that the person who made the cake is endorsing, supporting, or approving of the underlying reason for buying the cake. It’s a cake. Whether that cake is going to be eaten at a child’s birthday party, a same-sex wedding, or after an orgy, no one looks at the cake and thinks anything about the cake designer other than his ability to make a tasty cake. This is conduct, not speech.

The free exercise of religion argument also fails. Mr. Phillips is free to practice his narrow, bigoted version of Christianity how he sees fit, as long as his observance does not harm others. He has chosen to take advantage of the public sphere for his own benefit: he earns a good living by opening a store to the public, taking their money, and baking cakes. If he wants to do that, he has to comply with certain laws, values, and norms that his state and country have concluded go along with participation in public life. If he cannot comply with those laws, he should close his shop.

So what is more important to him: practicing bigoted Christianity or making money? Plus, in a previous case, the Supreme Court has held that the free exercise right embodied in the First Amendment “does not include a right to disobey neutral and generally applicable laws, including non-discrimination laws.”

It is also wrong to argue that public accommodations laws require strict scrutiny. Strict scrutiny is reserved for laws that impinge basic rights, like laws that treat races differently. Public accommodations laws are about public conduct, not speech or religion. A catering hall cannot refuse to rent a space to someone just because she’s black or Latinx. A florist cannot refuse to make arrangements for someone just because she’s black and marrying a white person. This is conduct, not speech, and, therefore, not protected by any fundamental civil right.

The only way it could is if the Supreme Court changes the current law. There are likely 4 votes for that, from Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch. Justice Gorsuch has been itching for a case like this. His absurdly narrow view of marriage rights suggests that he will eagerly carve out an enormous hole in Obergefell every chance he gets.

Other arguments will come up at tomorrow’s oral argument. Keep an eye on Justice Kennedy, as usual. And watch for Chief Justice Roberts to choreograph reactionary beliefs. Follow Towleroad’s legal analyses over the coming days for more on Masterpiece Cakeshop.

Topics: Religion, Space, Supreme Court, towleroad More Posts About: Anti-Gay Discrimination, Ari Ezra Waldman, Jack Phillips, law, Masterpiece v Colorado, public accommodations, Religious Freedom

Related Posts
  • Hong Kong law firm Vidler & Co, which handled protest-related cases, to close after 19 years
  • Boy Scouts Lawsuit Settlement Approved By Judge; But Insurers Oppose, Saying Some of 82K Sex Abuse Victims’ Cases May Be Lies
  • All 9 Justices Said Tax-Funded Catholic Social Services Can Refuse LGBTQ Foster Couples? How Bad Is it? Kind of, But Complicated
  • Torn Apart: Lachlan Murdoch Tells Pals If ‘Trump Were To Run Again, It’d Be Bad’ — As ‘FOX News’ Patriach Rupert Thinks ‘He’s Good For Business’

    Torn Apart: Lachlan Murdoch Tells Pals If ‘Trump Were To Run Again, It’d Be Bad’ — As ‘FOX News’ Patriach Rupert Thinks ‘He’s Good For Business’

    Published by Radar Online Mega Although Fox News has “largely refrained” from criticizing ex-President Donald Trump publicly, Lachlan Murdoch – the network’s chief executive – has slammed Trump behind closed doors, Radar has learned. The surprising …Read More »
  • Herschel Walker’s Ex-Wife Says Former NFL Star ‘Threatened To Kill Her’ In New Senate Campaign Ad

    Herschel Walker’s Ex-Wife Says Former NFL Star ‘Threatened To Kill Her’ In New Senate Campaign Ad

    Published by Radar Online Mega Herschel Walker’s ex-wife recently accused the professional football player-turned-politician of threatening to kill her during their nearly 20-year-long marriage, Radar has learned. The shocking accusation was made by Cindy DeAngelis Grossman …Read More »
  • Facebook use plunges among US teens: survey

    Facebook use plunges among US teens: survey

    Published by AFP A new survey says teen have fled Facebook in recent years San Francisco (AFP) – US teens have left Facebook in droves over the past seven years, preferring to spend time at video-sharing …Read More »
  • ‘A Family Divided’: Melania & Ivanka Trump ‘Begging’ Donald Not To Run For President In 2024

    ‘A Family Divided’: Melania & Ivanka Trump ‘Begging’ Donald Not To Run For President In 2024

    Published by OK Magazine mega Donald Trump has made it clear that he wants to run for president again in 2024, but his family is less than pleased about his decision, which is causing a feud …Read More »
Previous Post: « Austria’s Top Court Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage, Says Gay Couples Can Marry Starting in 2019
Next Post: Stephen Colbert Grills Billy Bush About the Access Hollywood Tape and Trump’s Lies: WATCH »

Primary Sidebar

Adjacent News

  • US uncovers Iran ‘plot’ to kill ex-White House official John Bolton

    US uncovers Iran ‘plot’ to kill ex-White House official John Bolton

  • Texas church’s unauthorized production of ‘Hamilton’ ends with sermon comparing gay people to drug addicts: report

    Texas church’s unauthorized production of ‘Hamilton’ ends with sermon comparing gay people to drug addicts: report

  • Alex Jones’ Text Messages Turned Over To January 6 House Select Committee

    Alex Jones’ Text Messages Turned Over To January 6 House Select Committee

Good Trash: Going to Read It Somewhere, Y’know

  • Ellen Has Not Contacted Ex-Lover Anne Heche Following Fiery Crash Into LA Home

    Ellen Has Not Contacted Ex-Lover Anne Heche Following Fiery Crash Into LA Home

  • Pete Davidson Proposed to Kim Kardashian Before Their Breakup

    Pete Davidson Proposed to Kim Kardashian Before Their Breakup

  • New bombshell book on Trump reveals he wanted to be treated like Hitler: ‘Totally loyal’

    New bombshell book on Trump reveals he wanted to be treated like Hitler: ‘Totally loyal’

RSS Partner Links

  • 'John Wick: Chapter 4' Will be Franchise's Longest-Running Movie, Director Chad Stahelski Reveals
  • Thursday Ad Watch
  • Mask4Masc
  • Song of the Day: 'Nothing but Heartaches' by the Supremes
  • Page 1 Roundup (08/11)
  • Morning Wood
  • Lisa Kudrow Recalls Jerry Seinfeld Taking Credit for 'Friends' Success

Most Recent

  • Mark Zeigler: Brittney Griner has trade value a teacher does not

    Mark Zeigler: Brittney Griner has trade value a teacher does not

  • Torn Apart: Lachlan Murdoch Tells Pals If ‘Trump Were To Run Again, It’d Be Bad’ — As ‘FOX News’ Patriach Rupert Thinks ‘He’s Good For Business’

    Torn Apart: Lachlan Murdoch Tells Pals If ‘Trump Were To Run Again, It’d Be Bad’ — As ‘FOX News’ Patriach Rupert Thinks ‘He’s Good For Business’

  • Herschel Walker’s Ex-Wife Says Former NFL Star ‘Threatened To Kill Her’ In New Senate Campaign Ad

    Herschel Walker’s Ex-Wife Says Former NFL Star ‘Threatened To Kill Her’ In New Senate Campaign Ad

  • Facebook use plunges among US teens: survey

    Facebook use plunges among US teens: survey

  • ‘A Family Divided’: Melania & Ivanka Trump ‘Begging’ Donald Not To Run For President In 2024

    ‘A Family Divided’: Melania & Ivanka Trump ‘Begging’ Donald Not To Run For President In 2024

  • Cannibalism & Fetishes: Armie Hammer’s Disturbing Voice Memos & Messages Exposed By Alleged Victims

    Cannibalism & Fetishes: Armie Hammer’s Disturbing Voice Memos & Messages Exposed By Alleged Victims

  • Dr. Oz Loans $13 Million To His Political Campaign As Sliding Pools Doom His Senate Bid

    Dr. Oz Loans $13 Million To His Political Campaign As Sliding Pools Doom His Senate Bid

  • Brazilians Turn To Poisoning Monkeys Over Fear They Are Spreading Monkeypox: Report

    Brazilians Turn To Poisoning Monkeys Over Fear They Are Spreading Monkeypox: Report

Most Commented

Social

Twitter @tlrd | Facebook | Instagram @tlrd

Footer

Copyright © 2022 · Log in

×