• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy

Towleroad Gay News

Gay Blog Towleroad: More than gay news | gay men

  • Travel
  • Sports
  • Law/Justice
  • Celebrities
  • Film/TV/Stream
  • Republicans
  • Madonna
  • Books
  • Men
  • Trans Rights
  • Tech/Science
  • Royals
  • Monkeypox

3 Reasons Why Even The Narrow Masterpiece Cakeshop Decision is Bad

Ari Ezra Waldman June 5, 2018 Leave a Comment

Supreme Court SCOTUS

The Supreme Court’s decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop has to be described as narrow. It answered none of the major doctrinal questions raised by the baker’s claims. Justice Kennedy did not say whether baking a cake is constitutionally-protected expression. He did not discuss whether public accommodations laws are unconstitutional violations of the First Amendment’s guarantee of the free exercise of religion. He declined to generalize about how to address a potential conflict between the freedom of religion and equal protection. Instead, he wrote an opinion about how the procedure followed in this case was faulty.

Still, even this narrow decision, which has limited direct precedential value, is dangerous for three reasons.

RELATED: Gays Can’t Have Their Cake, SCOTUS Rules: ANALYSIS

First, at the end of the day, two queer men, Charlie Craig and Dave Mullens, had to suffer the indignity of being denied service just because they are gay. That the Supreme Court denied them vindication (for now) cannot be lost in the fact that the Court didn’t make any awful doctrinal conclusions. These two men were victims of discrimination in a personal and direct way, an experience that has been shown to have negative psychological effects. But even if it didn’t, even if Charlie and Dave are strong enough to recover and move on, no one should have their identities turned against them.

Second, the decision will have two unfortunate effects unfold over the next few years. First, there may be a chilling effect among queer people who want to get married. Many media outlets are reporting on this case with clickbait headlines that cause anxiety and misunderstanding among readers. Many just know that the Court sided with the anti-gay baker and allowed him to deny service to a gay couple. This result, and the uncertainty associated with the opinion’s narrow reasoning, will caused confused queer people to shy away from pressing their rights, not knowing what they can and cannot do. On the other side of the ledger, this decision is an invitation to homophobic litigation. Masterpiece did not answer the underlying question of whether equality legislation trumps the free exercise of bigotry. But allowing the Christian baker to deny service to gays in this case is going to encourage the religious right to press the case, to encourage Christian business owners to continue denying service to queer people, until they can take another, cleaner case back to the Supreme Court.

Third, the opinion includes troubling conclusions. As we discussed yesterday, the Court found that statements from Commissioners sitting on the Colorado Civil Rights Commission evidenced so much anti-religious bias that they denied the Christian baker a fair, impartial hearing. But those statements don’t really evidence bias. Here was the most offending statement:

I would also like to reiterate what we said in the hearing or the last meeting. Freedom of religion and religion has been used to justify all kinds of discrimination throughout history, whether it be slavery, whether it be the Holocaust, whether it be—I mean, we—we can list hundreds of situations where freedom of religion has been used to justify discrimination. And to me it is one of the most despicable pieces of rhetoric that people can use to—to use their religion to hurt others.

In reaction to this, the Court said, “To describe a man’s faith as ‘one of the most despicable pieces of rhetoric that people can use’ is to disparage his religion in at least two distinct ways: by describing it as despicable, and also by characterizing it as merely rhetorical—something insubstantial and even insincere.”

But that is not at all what the Commissioner did. His comment called out using religion as a pretext for discrimination. And besides, the Commissioner is one hundred percent correct. Christianity justified the Holocaust. Religion was used to justify slavery. Religion was used to justify Jim Crow, apartheid, and laws against interracial marriage.

ALSO: SCOTUS Rules 7-2 for Anti-Gay Baker in Masterpiece Cakeshop Case

This raises an important question. If saying something true, yet critical about religion as an institution is an example of expressing hostility toward religion, then is every comment critical of religion evidence of bias? Are we never allowed to say anything negative about the harms that can be wrought by fundamentalism? It’s now hard to imagine the forces of equality getting a fair hearing if no one can say anything negative about the forces of bigotry when they use religion to justify their hatred.

Granted, Masterpiece Cakeshop is neither a huge triumph for bigotry nor a devastating loss for equality. But it is not harmless. It allowed bigotry to win today and may have several dangerous effects.

Topics: History, Religion, Supreme Court, towleroad More Posts About: Ari Ezra Waldman, Jack Phillips, Law - Gay, LGBT, Masterpiece Cakeshop, Masterpiece v Colorado, Religious Freedom, SCOTUS

Related Posts
  • This Arab is Queer celebrates diversity of LGBTQ+ experience
  • Thousands gather in Tel Aviv for LGBT Pride march
  • Activists Rally, Make Case For Thailand Marriage Equality; Present Rewritten Version of Constitutional Court’s Ruling On Marriage Law
  • U.S. Supreme Court asks Maryland to bar protests at justices’ homes

    U.S. Supreme Court asks Maryland to bar protests at justices’ homes

    Published by Reuters By Jonathan Landay WASHINGTON (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court’s top security officer has asked Maryland Governor Larry Hogan to enforce laws barring picketing outside the Maryland homes of high court justices, saying …Read More »
  • New York moves to enshrine abortion rights in state constitution

    New York moves to enshrine abortion rights in state constitution

    Published by AFP The New York state senate — seen here in June 2011 — took action on Friday July 1, 2022 to add the right to an abortion to the state's consitution. New York (AFP) …Read More »
  • As ‘don’t say gay’ law takes effect in Florida, confusion reigns over classroom rules

    As ‘don’t say gay’ law takes effect in Florida, confusion reigns over classroom rules

    Published by Orlando Sentinel ORLANDO, Fla. — The new Florida law dubbed “don’t say gay” by its critics kicked in Friday, banning instruction on sexual orientation and gender identity in primary grades — and creating fears …Read More »
  • What charges might Trump face for trying to overturn 2020 election?

    What charges might Trump face for trying to overturn 2020 election?

    Published by Reuters (Corrects paragraph 15 to attribute testimony about Trump throwing a plate to Cassidy Hutchinson, not Kayleigh McEnaney; corrects name of judge in paragraph two to David Carter, not Andrew Carter) By Luc Cohen …Read More »
Previous Post: « POLL: Most Americans Oppose Businesses Refusing to Serve Gay People
Next Post: Designer Kate Spade Found Dead in NYC Apartment in Suicide at 55 »

Primary Sidebar

News

  • Trump foe Liz Cheney has not ruled out 2024 US presidential run

    Trump foe Liz Cheney has not ruled out 2024 US presidential run

  • New York bans guns in many public places after Supreme Court ruling

    New York bans guns in many public places after Supreme Court ruling

  • Ohio police officers shot fleeing Black man dozens of times, lawyer says

    Ohio police officers shot fleeing Black man dozens of times, lawyer says

RSS Partner Links

  • Happy Fourth of July!
  • Weekend Tennis Roundup
  • Jay Hernandez Thanks Fans After 'Magnum P.I.' Gets Picked Up By NBC
  • A Second 'A League of Their Own' Movie Almost Happened & Here's What It Would've Been About
  • Jennifer Lopez & Ben Affleck Support Local Artisans During The Holiday Weekend
  • 'Married At First Sight' Couples Still Together Today - Only 14 Out of 54 Couples Are Still Going Strong!
  • OMG, Priscilla Presley breaks down 15 looks from 1960 to now with ‘Vogue’

Most Recent

  • Silvio Berlusconi’s ex-partner Francesca Pascale marries singer girlfriend Paola Turci amid global Pride celebrations

    Silvio Berlusconi’s ex-partner Francesca Pascale marries singer girlfriend Paola Turci amid global Pride celebrations

  • U.S. Supreme Court asks Maryland to bar protests at justices’ homes

    U.S. Supreme Court asks Maryland to bar protests at justices’ homes

  • New York moves to enshrine abortion rights in state constitution

    New York moves to enshrine abortion rights in state constitution

  • As ‘don’t say gay’ law takes effect in Florida, confusion reigns over classroom rules

    As ‘don’t say gay’ law takes effect in Florida, confusion reigns over classroom rules

  • What charges might Trump face for trying to overturn 2020 election?

    What charges might Trump face for trying to overturn 2020 election?

  • Kenny Goss: I didn’t want to be Mrs George Michael

    Kenny Goss: I didn’t want to be Mrs George Michael

  • Adele feels ‘mortified’ over Las Vegas residency

    Adele feels ‘mortified’ over Las Vegas residency

  • Biden predicts states will try to arrest women who travel for abortions

    Biden predicts states will try to arrest women who travel for abortions

Most Commented

Social

Twitter @tlrd | Facebook | Instagram @tlrd
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
  • About Towleroad
  • Towleroad on Social Media
  • Privacy Policy
[towleroadmr] [towleroadtn]

Footer

Copyright © 2022 · Log in