Now that former Congressman Aaron Schock’s lawyers have turned the spotlight on his sexual orientation by asking the court handling his fraud case to dismiss the charges because federal investigators have been asking witnesses if he’s gay, others have started doing some digging.
The newspaper in Schock’s former congressional district uncovered some documents that reveal “his sexuality had a big bearing on his political machinations” and he was instructed by his former Chief of Staff Steven Shearer to stop acting gay.
Federal agents questioned Steven Shearer, Schock’s first chief of staff. According to the filings, Shear said “Schock was upset with the blogs and media comments about his sexuality. Schock denied the allegations and resented the accusations.”
So, as a top aide, Shearer offered stern advice. According to the documents, “Shearer believes that Schock did things that seemed ‘gay.’ Shearer criticized Schock on behaving in a way that would make people question his sexuality. Shearer has no evidence of Schock being ‘gay.’”
For all we know, maybe Shearer and other aides further admonished Schock to avoid watching “Ellen,” plucking his eyebrows or toting tiny dogs. After all, paparazzi are positively everywhere.
If that sounds stereotypical, that’s the point. Does any of these labels really matter? Apparently, yes, to Schock & Co. — not just back then but apparently now. Though Shock’s attorneys vilify prosecutors’ sexuality inquiries as “irrelevant” and “offensive,” they also seem to go to great length to stress Schock’s refutation of any hint of gayness.
The docs also revealed that Jeannie Etchart, Schock’s second executive assistant had “strong feelings” for Schock and “the thought of ‘could there be something there’ between she and Schock did cross her mind” but she let it go after determining he was “high maintenance,” according to the paper.
Schock faces a 24-count indictment for filing false tax returns and covering up fraud schemes, and using government and campaign funds improperly. Is any of this relevant to Schock’s case?
Many don’t believe so. Some do:
It's completely relevant if they are trying to determine a) that he’s a fraud on several levels; b) that he was taking trips w/BFs on gov $ https://t.co/QpBK5lOgEW
— Mike Signorile (@MSignorile) August 2, 2017
Aaron Schock’s lawyers say witnesses in the case against the former congressman have been asked “distasteful, offensive,” and “prejudicial” questions about every part of Schock’s sex life including whether he is gay and if his girlfriend was a beard.
The lawyers have accused investigators of “prosecutorial misconduct on a variety of grounds” over the invasive questions and asked for the case to be dismissed.
“The government has investigated nearly every facet of Mr. Schock’s professional, political, and personal life. This even includes his sex life. It is no secret that there has long been speculative gossip in the media about Mr. Schock’s sexual orientation.
“For no apparent reason, the government has felt itself compelled to investigate this too. Indeed, from the very inception of this investigation, the government has discussed with witnesses whether Mr. Schock is gay, whether he really ‘dated’ his ex-girlfriend (a highly accomplished diplomat and attorney), and whether he spent the night or shared hotel rooms with her.
Schock’s troubles began when photos of his Downton Abbey-inspired congressional office leaked and it was then discovered that he illegally accepted a designer’s services for free.
In March of 2015, the FBI began an investigation into Schock’s spending habits, an investigation that ultimately revealed “untoward allegations” about Schock that would damage his reputation, according to his lawyers. The disgraced anti-gay Illinois lawmaker resigned from his seat in 2015 after questions arose about his alleged misuse of funds.
RELATED: Aaron Schock Quotes Taylor Swift When Cornered About ‘Downton’ Office: ‘Haters Gonna Hate’ — VIDEO
Schock’s lawyers make the point that Schock’s sex life — whether gay or straight — is not germane and out of legal bounds, arguing investigators crossed a line with the “government’s inappropriate, irrelevant, and highly prejudicial questioning of witnesses about Mr. Schock’s sexual orientation and romantic relationships.”
Moreover, “The government’s apparent obsession with Mr. Schock’s sexuality and whether he “dated” Karla Gonzalez was fueled from the very first conversation with the government’s confidential informant,” Schock’s defense team argued.
Schock has long been rumored to be gay. In an interview given after Schock resigned from office, Schock’s father said that his son is not gay.
As a Republican lawmaker, Schock had a history of taking anti-LGBT positions.
Not only is Schock opposed to same-sex marriage, he supported a federal marriage amendment, opposed repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’, opposed the repeal of DOMA and voted against adding sexual orientation to federal hate crimes statutes.
Many of the gay rumors surrounding Schock were originally tied to his obsessive attention to his body, as well as that of other Republican congressmen. Schock, who was once accused of misusing campaign funds to further an exercise habit, flaunted the results of that regimen in a Men’s Health cover story in May 2013 after which he became known as the congressman with the abs. In June 2010, a photo of Schock at a White House picnic in white jeans, an aqua belt, and purple gingham shirt posted by the website Gawker.com sent the gay rumors into overdrive. Schock later tweeted that he “burned the belt”after the photo went viral.
Schock’s trial is scheduled to begin in January 2018.